Question For Handsome Men That See Escorts.

xmontrealer

(he/him/it)
May 23, 2005
11,470
9,353
113
Umm dude he's Pete Davison, guys got a wiki. I'm talking about average joes doing backbreaking construction jobs or work in IT and other regular jobs. I don't think Kimmy is lining up to bang guys like us. You're basically proving my point that women specially in anglo countries like Canada want extraordinary men which 99% just arent which goes back to my point about women in today's day and age having unrealistic expectations from men. They're not only unrealistic, they're fucking downright insane.

By your own admission you said you got a SO who's out of your league. Let me guess you got her, in the 80/90s when social media/dating apps didn't exist? We aren't in the 70's anymore where you can just go to bar/park and approach a chik you like and get her number and take her back to your place and bang her brains out. Women dont have the same options today that they had in your times. Ever consider that? FFS The rejection rate (and the soul crushing embarrassment) that comes along with it is simply not worth it for most guys. There's a reason why women never approach men in the open because they themselves can't tolerate rejection. Notice how the burden of improvement always lies with the men but Becky doesn't need to do shit.

I can easily tell you dont approach chix out in the open anymore so I wont be responding to your delusional posts anymore cause you have zero infield experience. So yeah "ciao".
Apparently Pete also sports a very BWD...
 

brandon7649

Active member
Aug 18, 2025
87
146
33
Umm dude he's Pete Davison, guys got a wiki. I'm talking about average joes doing backbreaking construction jobs or work in IT and other regular jobs. I don't think Kimmy is lining up to bang guys like us. You're basically proving my point that women specially in anglo countries like Canada want extraordinary men which 99% just arent which goes back to my point about women in today's day and age having unrealistic expectations from men. They're not only unrealistic, they're fucking downright insane. These average women don't deserve male models but they have access to them because of dating apps. A 6 female should get a 6 or 7 at max, but these women are getting 10s on Tinder. Meanwhile a 7 or 8 man can't even get a 4. The scales have turned to one gender so badly that its become untenable for men.

By your own admission you said you got a SO who's out of your league. Let me guess you got her, in the 80/90s when social media/dating apps didn't exist? We aren't in the 70's anymore where you can just go to bar/park and approach a chik you like and get her number and take her back to your place and bang her brains out. Women dont have the same options today that they had in your times. Ever consider that? FFS The rejection rate (and the soul crushing embarrassment) that comes along with it is simply not worth it for most guys. There's a reason why women never approach men in the open because they themselves can't tolerate rejection. Notice how the burden of improvement always lies with the men but Becky doesn't need to do shit.

I can easily tell you dont approach chix out in the open anymore so I wont be responding to your delusional posts anymore cause you have zero infield experience. So yeah "ciao".
was in the 2010s and I would chat her up and the others at a frikkin TTC stop / mall / Timmmies/ starbucks....

but you be you.. go ahead believing women are like some alien species
sigh...ok you don't seem to get what im saying....ask yourself this in 10-15 years!
 
Last edited:

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
795
750
93
A not all that surprising finding from a researcher at the University of Toronto. Hell, all she needed to do was read threads like this one on Terb.


More women are choosing to be single, and that leads to more single men. Math is hard, but the math around that concept isn’t hard.

It doesn’t matter what life was like decades ago in terms of pick-ups. Women are not inanimate objects where the right conversation line or pushing the right button makes them do what you want them to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brandon7649

xix

Time Zone Traveller
Jul 27, 2002
4,828
1,753
113
La la land
I say this with no condescension nor with malice, but think about this (it might take time to realize this) : women are much more simpler than social media lets you believe
I like to meet these women you say are simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jon917254

xix

Time Zone Traveller
Jul 27, 2002
4,828
1,753
113
La la land
Women can have her girl's night out and all is well the next day.
Most of them are crying inside quietly just like men. But they won't say it because they learned not to feel it after drinking alcohol when the guy paid for it.
 

brandon7649

Active member
Aug 18, 2025
87
146
33
I like to meet these women you say are simple.
Look around tomorrow morning when you grab your morning coffee…once to the left, then to the right
Ya gotta be kidding me if you can’t say hi to a girl you find attractive.. shucks
If your looking for pity from me you ain’t getting it…
There will be apps or AI or whatever crap that will come in the future, but the dating game for straight guys will always be you want it, you go get it. She doesn’t buy it fine move on
 

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
795
750
93
Look around tomorrow morning when you grab your morning coffee…once to the left, then to the right
Ya gotta be kidding me if you can’t say hi to a girl you find attractive.. shucks
If your looking for pity from me you ain’t getting it…
There will be apps or AI or whatever crap that will come in the future, but the dating game for straight guys will always be you want it, you go get it. She doesn’t buy it fine move on
Should Jon just say to her Hi, I’m Chad, or should he look into her ears (possibly after flirtingly moving her hair away from her ears) to see if she has earbuds to motion for their removal before saying, Hi, I’m Chad? Most flirting is done in low voice tones, so automatically talking loud to a stranger under the assumption that she has earbuds in with the volume on never seems wise.

I guess I should admire your optimism. But it wouldn’t take me long after being ignored for two weeks at the morning $5 coffee place to start doing Hooker Math. Coffee is free at the office, which absolutely can’t be pussy hunting ground in the #metoo era. Sure you have to spend 25 cents a cup on whipped cream and syrup and sprinkles to make it the same as the Coffee shop. Once again, no whipped cream sex jokes to the hot female coworker watching you and waiting her turn. $4.75 times say 260 days is right at $1,200 which would buy two ninety minute steamy, fetish-friendly with my favorite lady at AleegraCollective., who doesn’t have a tacky tip jar out like the barista.

Jon says escorts are fucking expensive, but not compared to Starbucks coffee (as long as as free coffee is available and you have the willingness to learn whipped cream, syrups and sprinkles.

Of course two 90 minute two-cum sessions in a year isn’t very many, so hopefully there are other sources of funds for other sessions other than from Coffee Savings.

For most of us over time, this just becomes a risk/reward analysis. If you strike out so often at the coffee shop that the baristas are taking bets, putting the funds into the Hooker Pool starts looking more inviting, especially as you get older. I do wonder also how many women in the coffee shop are there looking? Plus in the suburban U.S. anyway, drive-thru coffee is becoming a thing. Most have only one lane, so you can’t motion from the other lane for her to roll down her window to have a flirty chat at loud voices.
 

brandon7649

Active member
Aug 18, 2025
87
146
33
Should Jon just say to her Hi, I’m Chad, or should he look into her ears (possibly after flirtingly moving her hair away from her ears) to see if she has earbuds to motion for their removal before saying, Hi, I’m Chad? Most flirting is done in low voice tones, so automatically talking loud to a stranger under the assumption that she has earbuds in with the volume on never seems wise.

I guess I should admire your optimism. But it wouldn’t take me long after being ignored for two weeks at the morning $5 coffee place to start doing Hooker Math. Coffee is free at the office, which absolutely can’t be pussy hunting ground in the #metoo era. Sure you have to spend 25 cents a cup on whipped cream and syrup and sprinkles to make it the same as the Coffee shop. Once again, no whipped cream sex jokes to the hot female coworker watching you and waiting her turn. $4.75 times say 260 days is right at $1,200 which would buy two ninety minute steamy, fetish-friendly with my favorite lady at AleegraCollective., who doesn’t have a tacky tip jar out like the barista.

Jon says escorts are fucking expensive, but not compared to Starbucks coffee (as long as as free coffee is available and you have the willingness to learn whipped cream, syrups and sprinkles.

Of course two 90 minute two-cum sessions in a year isn’t very many, so hopefully there are other sources of funds for other sessions other than from Coffee Savings.

For most of us over time, this just becomes a risk/reward analysis. If you strike out so often at the coffee shop that the baristas are taking bets, putting the funds into the Hooker Pool starts looking more inviting, especially as you get older. I do wonder also how many women in the coffee shop are there looking? Plus in the suburban U.S. anyway, drive-thru coffee is becoming a thing. Most have only one lane, so you can’t motion from the other lane for her to roll down her window to have a flirty chat at loud voices.
interesting take, but you're taking me a little too literally..im not saying chat up every girl at the coffee shop or at the library..
there are cues, gotta be subtle with your approach and dont think like your trying to get in her pants right away...that for sure will never work
Chivalry can still happen, if you give it a chance... ignore the ones who have their headphones on always

Me too had to happen. There were too many creeps and assaulters getting away with shit.. I wouldnt disagree with you that women have been taking advantage of the post me-too world at the moment, but that too will settle in time, just like it took time for me-too to happen.

But me-too or not, the basics are still the same for all the guys seriously looking for a woman: women aren't interested in looks but charisma, confidence and your stupid unique jokes
you like a girl,, go upto her and tell her that (with some tact).. she doesnt dig you, move on :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patron

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,774
1,521
113
I don't know about others, but I typically hobby in between rounds of civvie dating. The typical cycle is date for a bit, find someone to go steady with, stay steady with them for a few years, go our separate ways, hobby for a few years, then start the cycle over again. Usually I'm burnt out on civvie dating at some point, and hobbying is hugely attractive to me. After awhile I get burnt out on hobbying, and civvie dating becomes hugely attractive to me.

Now, I wouldn't say I'm a 10/10 by any means, looks wise, but I have to imagine it's the same for many who are. Civvie dating comes with a lot of BS and sometimes it's just simpler and more peaceful to see industry ladies.
 

xix

Time Zone Traveller
Jul 27, 2002
4,828
1,753
113
La la land
Look around tomorrow morning when you grab your morning coffee…once to the left, then to the right
Ya gotta be kidding me if you can’t say hi to a girl you find attractive.. shucks
If your looking for pity from me you ain’t getting it…
There will be apps or AI or whatever crap that will come in the future, but the dating game for straight guys will always be you want it, you go get it. She doesn’t buy it fine move on
Trust me I can easily say "Hi"
I like to meet these women you say are simple.
you say are simple. I am way past hi and other things. So what is simple?
They play games, I walk.
They have many male friends, I walk.
They want to eat out but me pay, I walk.

So,,,, simple?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts