My questions are about reviews.
1 Should you write a review on someone who has many great recent reviews?
2 Do you write reviews on repeat visits? Don't see many of those.
3 How do you write a good review without being called shill. I mean I have seen this thrown at all the new guys.
4 How do you write a constructive review without getting piled on by all the loyal followers?
Just interested in your 2 cents worth?
Thanks
First of all I'm a SC guy, and I mostly do club reviews of the more obscure clubs... I only tend to mention dancers incidentally, partly because I suck with names, partly because I don't much want to walk back into a club two months later and have a dancer whisper, "That's the guy from a while ago that reviewed me." Dancers have the memory of an elephant for guys that spent money on them.
1. Reviews on the recently reviewed: Whatever you want. Writing reviews of the 'already reviewed' allows other readers who have partaken to 'put you in context', while reviewing the un-reviewed is more of a 'public service', IMHO. Personally I tend to focus on the less reviewed SCs because I love to crawl and I hope my reviews spawn some reciprocity. Also, some clubs are so overrepresented people could tell you about the current status of the urinal cakes. So, if you want to establish a rep review the reviewed, and if you want to encourage people to TOFTT reviews or spill their gems review the un-reviewed. One technique is to lump more than one review into a well labelled post. This lets you compare and contrast, and can help people put you in context, and can give people a familiar reference point. (Oh, I saw her, but didn't see her.)
2. Reviews on repeats: Whatever you want. Mind you, if you keep reviewing the same person, or only people from one agency, and bump threads for little or no reason, you'll get branded with a scarlet 'S'. If you re-review you should disclose that you reviewed the Incall, SP, MP, MPA, SC, or Dancer before, and you should do a few unrelated reviews in the interim. Also, if you're say an 'Incall guy', if you actually have relevant advice, chiming in constructively between your reviews goes a long way to establishing some credibility. (There's 6 or so guys in the SC forum who's word I'd take pretty much verbatim because they've lined up well with my own experiences. Or at least I understand their biases and I can translate that to my experience.)
3. Good reviews without the Scarlet 'S': We all have our own preferences, and we all have our own biases, and all ends of the sex industry are YMMV. With that being said honestly disclose your preferences, and honestly disclose your biases, and write your reviews from something of a realist POV. You'll do fine and you'll have some credibility rather fast... Like I mentioned before lumping a couple of reviews to compare and contrast can be good there, along with linking a relevant past review of yours. Aim for clear, concise, and constructive while preserving as much anonymity as you desire for yourself. (I can be long winded.)
4. Good reviews without being piled on: As above: clear, concise, constructive, AND honest. Once you have an established reputation for that and your biases and preferences are known, everybody might not agree with a review, but as always "YMMV". Compare, "I saw AmyXXX from Cl and man she was a dirty bitch what a waste of $120. <Link to AD>" to "I saw AmyXXX from CL. Rate was $120 for the half hour. Her pictures were dated and she's gained 20 lbs. She's also cut and died her hair black. Her apartment was near Queen and Dufferin, she really should consider scooping the kitty litter before appointments. Also, the sheets didn't seem too fresh. Service was all covered, where I had a CBJ, then some cowgirl, and finished in mish. Service was OK. I wouldn't repeat. <Link to AD>" Both posts would offend a 'manager' or 'fanboy', but the latter is defensible in so far as it's true, and the former just encourages a tit-for-tat shitfest.
Don't worry about pleasing every anonymous stranger on the Internet, and don't feel a compulsive need to respond to every critical post withing minutes. Be clear, concise, constructive, AND honest, outline your preferences and biases, and let the chips fall where they may. (With an eye to preserving as much anonymity for yourself as you want.)
