It depends whether people buy into the Liberals' attack ads. Rather than providing us with reasons to vote for them, they've opted to just demonize Harper.americanson said:Any chance of Harper, Mckay et all being elected next mnoth?
You can keep Hillary and Sharpton. How about Cheryl Gallant (wacko Conservative MP) and Peter MacKay for the rest?I truly do enjoy them and would swap the likes of Bill And Hillary, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Noam Chomsky, And Michael Moore. But then again I love Canada so why would I wanna do that to you guys? Food for thought.
Gallant is a lovely MP best known for shouting "Where's your boyfriend" to our then Defence Minister as he gave a speech in the House of Commons. She topped that ignorance last week, though, and how!americanson said:Never heard of gallant but anything is an improvement over O'Reilly. Yes I know he's a rightie but he's one of the few exceptions who I can't stand.
You must be a US hydro consultant.Sukdeep said:I LIKE MIKE!
I LIKE MIKE!
I LIKE MIKE!
I LIKE MIKE!
Do you like pay a fortune for hydro executives?eyeofthedragon said:I just wish Mike Harris would run for PM
Unfortunately I don’t think they will be elected. Even with the sponsorship scandal where the Liberals “lost” $250 million, polls show that support for them is still high.americanson said:Hey Borg. Any chance of Harper, Mckay et all being elected next mnoth? I
My question to this is,why?? For the life of me I cant see why the people of this country are so in love with the godamned Liberals,theyve done NOTHING to deserve reelection,they waste our money,they are soft on crime( the so called Youth Justice Act comes to mind) the whole party is full of corruption and fraud,and this is just for starters,Steven Harper and the new Conservative party would be a much better choice,lets see people give them a chance instead of reelecting an arrogant bunch of wasteful bums!!borg007 said:Unfortunately I don’t think they will be elected. Even with the sponsorship scandal where the Liberals “lost” $250 million, polls show that support for them is still high.
In fact the last poll conducted suggests that if an election were held today the Liberals would win another majority government, aka 4 year dictatorship.
Dan****an said:My question to this is,why?? For the life of me I cant see why the people of this country are so in love with the godamned Liberals,theyve done NOTHING to deserve reelection,they waste our money,they are soft on crime( the so called Youth Justice Act comes to mind) the whole party is full of corruption and fraud,and this is just for starters,Steven Harper and the new Conservative party would be a much better choice,lets see people give them a chance instead of reelecting an arrogant bunch of wasteful bums!!
Cutting social programs is not always bad. Look at the number of people on welfare before Harris cut it. Currently there are less than 180,000 people on welfare thanks to him.guelph said:As opposed to the people who would involve us in an unjust war
and would gut our social programs
make cosy deals with their friends and supporters.
Liberals DID NOT whine or comment about not being let in on the reconstruction - did in fact offer foreign aid of several hundred million.americanson said:With all due respect guelph, after Saddam was caught the libs were whining that they weren't being let in on reconstruction contracts in Iraq. If anyone in Canada deserved to profit on them it would have to be the alliance, former pm Brian Mulroney, Mike Harris, Ernie Eaves etc. Obvious reasons.
As for you comment on the unjust war let me say the following. There are few people in the world that do not agree with the war in Afghanistan. After all the Americans were attached first, it was their right to defend themselves right.guelph said:As opposed to the people who would involve us in an unjust war
and would gut our social programs
make cosy deals with their friends and supporters.
borg007 said:Cutting social programs is not always bad. Look at the number of people on welfare before Harris cut it. Currently there are less than 180,000 people on welfare thanks to him.
We are not talking about good paying jobs or bad paying jobs we are talking about people not wanting to work. You do the math. $600 per month on welfare or $1080 a month ($6 an hour 40 hours per week approximately 4.5 weeks in a month) which is better I’d take the 1080 a month. Problem is may people with few financial obligations would rather stay at home and watch TV them work for minimum wages.guelph said:Why do you ignore the facts.
You assume the upswing in the economy had nothing to do with more low end jobs being available and therefore people were able to get off welfare.
So I guess your saying that Harris spends good money after bad for stupid causes.guelph said:Why do you ignore the facts. Harris spent more than 2,000,000 on an consulting study / audit to find virtually no fraud.
Under the Harris conservatives only US Hydro electric consultants were supposed to have high paying secure jobs.
First they did wine about it.guelph said:Liberals DID NOT whine or comment about not being let in on the reconstruction - did in fact offer foreign aid of several hundred million.
Will you tell me why that should go to American firms.