The past perfect tense describes actions completed before another past event.Jim while John had had had had had had had had had had had my approval.
I believe it is better to sayThat that is, is that. That is not, is not. Is that it? It is.
Had' is the past form as well as the past participle of 'have'.The past perfect tense describes actions completed before another past event.
John had had a had that had had a had that had had my approval
kind of makes sense and is as far I can go with it
I had had my breakfast.
Still need to do the punctuation.The past perfect tense describes actions completed before another past event.
John had had a had that had had a had that had had my approval
kind of makes sense and is as far I can go with it
WTF are the rules for that ? Punctuation changes everythingStill need to do the punctuation.![]()
The entire point of the thread (and that post) was "how do you punctuate this so it means what it is supposed to mean"?WTF are the rules for that ? Punctuation changes everything
John had had a "had" that had had a "had" that had had my approval
I think it now means I had approved of the had that that was had by a had had
Yes.Punctuation changes everything