This post is self-censored. I am performing this virtual self mutilation because the gallant, educated, and always right moderator - or perhaps a minion bot - deleted a previous post. This because I dared to use the gee golly shock horror term
"b!tc#". My oh my. I do declare. Aren't we a dainty lot, offended by the most common of words. And to top it off, I meant it in a good way.
It appears that this forum, like just about all Internet h**k$r review boards has degenerated into nothing more than a marketing forum for glorified se_me_ receptacles, and by a quick sample of even the professionally shot photos, most of these women are not "fantasy girls". I know we're all God's children and all that, but considering how hard women are on men, and even on other women, I dare say, it's about time men started to call a spade a spade.
Consider the enormous amounts that women can make from pr*stitution. Is it to much to ask the average h*rnd*g to whack it so he doesn't blow his wad (of cash) on something that does not and should not come close to his expectations.
However, I am not optimistic that I can successfully alter other people's behaviour. People once inclined toward stupidity are hard to dissuade. Hence voices in their heads sound like the voices of reason. The result: delusion such as that the common voter can grasp nay change the policy matters that affect the destiny of his nation, or even richer that he is anything more, ultimately, than a transfer mechanism for genetic code in a wide context (John may never procreate but his bro Johnny might).
True rebellion has to do with rebelling against nature's design. Therefore, the concept that women could ever be worthy of renumeration even approaching that paid to a man, that's a pretty earth shaking concept. It's also twisted enough that in time it will destroy whole societies, leading to a "new" paradigm, the olde tyme religion by some new funky name. Of course, that is not how it will be presented at the time, long after we're all compost. No, there will probably be some "scientific" explanation. The simple fact is if you alter the assumptions that society has been based on for eternity, you're going to change a few other things as well. I think we see that in the divorce rate. But I digress.
If John wants to blow his cash on these "dream girls" because he can't find an honest review for all the White Knights that shout down the hint of objectivity and go off topic in every thread, because the standards for aesthetic appearance are so low that Condoleeza Rice could pass for Florence Griffith, because performance is considered an act of charity, because the mere tolerance of cash dispensing men by street women is immensely kind, if he wants to spend his rainy day cancer funds on the "hobby" perhaps harboring the fantasy that she'll fall in love with him and her children will care for him in his old age, what line of work should John be in so that he can make enough or more to satisfy his hunger. Say he wants to earn at just the rate of an average escort. That works out to $5000 to $8000 after taxes take home per month - working part time. Part time is anything less than 35 hours a week, so even at 20 hours, at a "profit" of $100 per hour dispensing with opportunity cost, cost of "supplies", self maintenance and regular non-surgical cosmetic procedures, conscientious medical supervision and testing (I am gooood!), a rigorous fitness and diet program, transportation, advertising and adminsitrative costs, $180 is too generous. In fact, I expect the margin to be greater than that stated above. But let's stick with $100 pure profit.
The question is, John wants to earn as much as his lady of the red light. The line of work cannot be outright illegal or dangerous. Escorting is neither, although there is a hint of risk, I'll grant that. Therefore, the old yobbish grunt of "become a drug dealer" is out. And whoever though that should sober up. Lawyer, Doctor, Politician, these all take time and training. So let provide this guideline. The barrier to entry should be as low or lower than escorting or massage service, and the skills should be equal to those demonstrated by providers reviewed on this board, and the effort should likewise be equivalent. What work does John do to make as much money?
"b!tc#". My oh my. I do declare. Aren't we a dainty lot, offended by the most common of words. And to top it off, I meant it in a good way.
It appears that this forum, like just about all Internet h**k$r review boards has degenerated into nothing more than a marketing forum for glorified se_me_ receptacles, and by a quick sample of even the professionally shot photos, most of these women are not "fantasy girls". I know we're all God's children and all that, but considering how hard women are on men, and even on other women, I dare say, it's about time men started to call a spade a spade.
Consider the enormous amounts that women can make from pr*stitution. Is it to much to ask the average h*rnd*g to whack it so he doesn't blow his wad (of cash) on something that does not and should not come close to his expectations.
However, I am not optimistic that I can successfully alter other people's behaviour. People once inclined toward stupidity are hard to dissuade. Hence voices in their heads sound like the voices of reason. The result: delusion such as that the common voter can grasp nay change the policy matters that affect the destiny of his nation, or even richer that he is anything more, ultimately, than a transfer mechanism for genetic code in a wide context (John may never procreate but his bro Johnny might).
True rebellion has to do with rebelling against nature's design. Therefore, the concept that women could ever be worthy of renumeration even approaching that paid to a man, that's a pretty earth shaking concept. It's also twisted enough that in time it will destroy whole societies, leading to a "new" paradigm, the olde tyme religion by some new funky name. Of course, that is not how it will be presented at the time, long after we're all compost. No, there will probably be some "scientific" explanation. The simple fact is if you alter the assumptions that society has been based on for eternity, you're going to change a few other things as well. I think we see that in the divorce rate. But I digress.
If John wants to blow his cash on these "dream girls" because he can't find an honest review for all the White Knights that shout down the hint of objectivity and go off topic in every thread, because the standards for aesthetic appearance are so low that Condoleeza Rice could pass for Florence Griffith, because performance is considered an act of charity, because the mere tolerance of cash dispensing men by street women is immensely kind, if he wants to spend his rainy day cancer funds on the "hobby" perhaps harboring the fantasy that she'll fall in love with him and her children will care for him in his old age, what line of work should John be in so that he can make enough or more to satisfy his hunger. Say he wants to earn at just the rate of an average escort. That works out to $5000 to $8000 after taxes take home per month - working part time. Part time is anything less than 35 hours a week, so even at 20 hours, at a "profit" of $100 per hour dispensing with opportunity cost, cost of "supplies", self maintenance and regular non-surgical cosmetic procedures, conscientious medical supervision and testing (I am gooood!), a rigorous fitness and diet program, transportation, advertising and adminsitrative costs, $180 is too generous. In fact, I expect the margin to be greater than that stated above. But let's stick with $100 pure profit.
The question is, John wants to earn as much as his lady of the red light. The line of work cannot be outright illegal or dangerous. Escorting is neither, although there is a hint of risk, I'll grant that. Therefore, the old yobbish grunt of "become a drug dealer" is out. And whoever though that should sober up. Lawyer, Doctor, Politician, these all take time and training. So let provide this guideline. The barrier to entry should be as low or lower than escorting or massage service, and the skills should be equal to those demonstrated by providers reviewed on this board, and the effort should likewise be equivalent. What work does John do to make as much money?