Ashley Madison

Poll : Almost A 1/4 Of Democrats Believe Men Can Get Pregnant

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113
Almost 1 In 4 Democrats Believe Men Can Get Pregnant; New Poll Finds

FRIDAY, SEP 09, 2022 - 01:05 PM


A poll conducted by WPA Intelligence has found that almost one quarter of Democratic voters believe that “some men can become pregnant.”


Twenty-two percent of Democrats overall agreed with the statement.


The poll also found that more women agreed with the statement, and an incredible 36 percent of white, college-educated female Democrats agreed.



WPAi Managing Director Conor Maguire commented that “with 36% of a core Democratic constituency (college-educated white Democratic women) and one out of five Democrat voters believing this, one can see why Democratic leaders coddle the radical gender theory movement.”
The findings come following weeks of Democratic witnesses testifying at Judiciary Committee hearings in the House that they believe men can get pregnant and have abortions.
UC Berkley Law Professor Khiara Bridges refused to use the word ‘woman’ and accused Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley of being “transphobic” and “inciting violence” for saying men can’t have babies.



Many of them also refused to define what a woman is, with National Women’s Law Center president Fatima Goss-Graves telling Republicans that “You’re trying to suggest that people who don’t identify as women can’t get pregnant.”




Last month all 50 Democrats in the Senate voted against an amendment that sought to define pregnancy as a uniquely biologically female process.


This lunacy isn’t just restricted to woke academics making a scene in Congress, but is translating through to real life with terms including “women” or “mothers” being replaced by doctors in hospitals with “birthing people” or “pregnant people” to appease people with gender dysphoria or just straight up mental illness.
The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine in the U.S. has issued a new guide, advising hospitals and health carers to change their language to be more “gender-inclusive”.
The guide lists “traditional terms” such as ‘breast milk’ and then suggests woke alternatives including “human milk”, “parent’s milk”, and most ridiculously “father’s milk.”
As we highlighted back in June, the NHS in the UK caused controversy by erasing all references to women from an online advice section about the menopause, an exclusively female condition.
During the same month, which by no coincidence was also ‘Pride Month’, the NHS website altered its guidance pages on ovarian cancer, removing instances of the word “women” in a move that sources said was intended to be more “inclusive” toward trans, non-binary and intersex people.
This trend has reached as far as dictionaries literally changing the definition of the word “female” to include anyone who identifies as one.
We also face a future where if you type the ‘wrong’ word, Google will correct your language to help you become more ‘inclusive’.

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113
These people are allowed to vote and reproduce......

WOW,,,we are in deep shheeet!

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/115/437/275/playable/bc502790767c5d06.mp4


PS. Woke / liberal/ democratic ideology will kill western culture … FYI I wonder what the fuck they are teaching in school?

 
Last edited:

ShockNAwww

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2020
774
716
93


Neat to see who’s excited about the story. Daily Stormer, Zero Hedge, InfoWars and the likes, a bunch of Christian websites and blogs…

WPA Research who claims to have conducted the poll, received more than 80% of its operating funds in 2020 from the National Republican Congressional Committee, Congressional Leadership Fund, and most of all from the Club for Growth Action.

The Club for Growth Action is a conservative Super-PAC funded almost exclusively by billionaires Jeff Yass (of Cato Institute fame) and Richard Uihlein (Uline and Schlitz) whose primary interests are lowering income taxes and eliminating estate taxes… And “school choice” initiatives, which if successful would certainly make it easier for a future generation to digest this kind of tripe.

Dupers gonna dupe.
 
Last edited:

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
17,317
17,581
113
Canada
My bullshit detector:

Checked the media bias of Summit News (the source and posted by the OP) of the article and found it to be extreme right wight and to be very low in factual reporting.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
  • Overall, we rate Summit News Questionable based on Extreme Right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, misleading and unproven stories, and a complete lack of transparency.


 
Last edited:

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,997
8,855
113
Room 112
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113
My bullshit detector:

Checked the media bias of Summit News (the source and posted by the OP) of the article and found it to be extreme right wight and to be very low in factual reporting.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
  • Overall, we rate Summit News Questionable based on Extreme Right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, misleading and unproven stories, and a complete lack of transparency.


You can dispute the source maybe the polls is flaws, but you cannot dispute both the video( senate video & rumble video of definition of a women video) and Webster dictionary definition Of a woman.


PS. All the mainstream fact checker source said Russian collusion ( trump piss gate) said it is true…if it was true Trump would had been put in jail. So I am questioning your fact checker reliability! Figured your facts checker is source is have a liberal biases! I know summit news have a extremely right wing biases , but the video speak for itself. If Webster definition is change for a woman then everything is changed toward woke liberal culture!
 
Last edited:

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,869
98,244
113
Addy, 1/4 - or whatever number - of Democrats (assuming any of these classifications or the stats themselves in this "documentary" are accurate and genuine and anything other than grifting $$$$ on a YouTube channel) believe that women who identify socially as men can get pregnant. There's nothing odd in that, if you accept that someone with one biological gender can identify as another gender.

We done here now?
 

ShockNAwww

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2020
774
716
93
You can dispute the source maybe the polls is flaws, but you cannot dispute both the video( senate video & rumble video of definition of a women video) and Webster dictionary definition Of a woman.


PS. All the mainstream fact checker source said Russian collusion ( trump piss gate) said it is true…if it was true Trump would had been put in jail. So I am questioning your fact checker reliability! Figured your facts checker is source is have a liberal biases! I know summit news have a extremely right wing biases , but the video speak for itself. If Webster definition is change for a woman then everything is changed toward woke liberal culture!
Genuinely curious.

I can understand how these stories and headlines would spur American Christian Evangelicals to flock to the polling stations. That’s their design.

Abrahamic religions are pretty cut and dry about gender essentialism, and the GOP needs its 🐑 to have a reason to be maaahhhd enough to vote.

But why does this stuff get you upset enough to put all that effort into a post on TERB?

If there ever was a culture war over the recognition of the existence of trans people, it appears that war has been thoroughly and definitively lost.

For further reading on the subject of transgender men who have experienced pregnancy:










 
Last edited:

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113
Genuinely curious.

I can understand how these stories and headlines would spur American Christian Evangelicals to flock to the polling stations. That’s their design.

Abrahamic religions are pretty cut and dry about gender essentialism, and the GOP needs its 🐑 to have a reason to be maaahhhd enough to vote.

But why does this stuff get you upset enough to put all that effort into a post on TERB?

If there ever was a culture war over the recognition of the existence of trans people, it appears that war has been thoroughly and definitively lost.

For reading on the subject of transgender men who have experienced pregnancy:










If your born at birth as a female with two XX chromosome with a ovaries and uterus and then you “call yourself become a men “ by renaming yourself and calling yourself transgender men and start taking male hormones and retain your ovaries and uterus.Obviously biological you are still capable of having a baby. At of this moment no man that born with a XY chromosome and born without ovaries and uteras and have a penis able to have a baby yet as of today. If some distant future ( maybe in decades from now) they able to create a artifical
womb and artificial ovaries and then transplants a live ovaries into a trangender man that will make medical history And able to carry a baby to 12 month then it will make history. Right now it not posssible! If you born with a vagina and ovaries and maybe even able by some odd medical phenomenon born with a penis too. ( have both ovaries and penis ) then it possible . But you carry both organ of sexes and most likely have two XX chromosome they are consider female . Regardless if they call themself male ( transgender male) Still biological they are still female born at birth with females reproductively parts.


FYI: For instance, a person who was assigned female at birth (AFAB) but identifies as a man may refer to themselves as a “transgender” man or a gender nonconforming individual..

PS. Bottom line renaming youself from female to male while retaining your ovaries and uterus which your born with biologically obviously you can havE a baby. Hence woke logic man can have a baby!!! Group think defying facts will be downfall of western civilization…Now you wonder why China will beat everyone. Unfortunately with Russia partners with China the western world is fuck! The new superpower China & Russia. And the deaths of Global currency the US dollar will happen due to this woke madness!

PPS. The western society blew it when they have the chance to partner with Russia ( Boris Yeltsin & or Putin ) and the demon Russia and pushed them to partners with China. They will become unbeatable : (
 
Last edited:

ShockNAwww

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2020
774
716
93
Addy, 1/4 - or whatever number - of Democrats (assuming any of these classifications or the stats themselves in this "documentary" are accurate and genuine and anything other than grifting $$$$ on a YouTube channel) believe that women who identify socially as men can get pregnant. There's nothing odd in that, if you accept that someone with one biological gender can identify as another gender.

We done here now?
“Conservative billionaires and GOP funded poll proves that GOP voters know less about something than Democrats” might not get the number of clicks and daily views they need to keep the swindle going.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,667
6,835
113

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Almost 1 In 4 Democrats Believe Men Can Get Pregnant; New Poll Finds

FRIDAY, SEP 09, 2022 - 01:05 PM


A poll conducted by WPA Intelligence has found that almost one quarter of Democratic voters believe that “some men can become pregnant.”


Twenty-two percent of Democrats overall agreed with the statement.


The poll also found that more women agreed with the statement, and an incredible 36 percent of white, college-educated female Democrats agreed.



WPAi Managing Director Conor Maguire commented that “with 36% of a core Democratic constituency (college-educated white Democratic women) and one out of five Democrat voters believing this, one can see why Democratic leaders coddle the radical gender theory movement.”
The findings come following weeks of Democratic witnesses testifying at Judiciary Committee hearings in the House that they believe men can get pregnant and have abortions.
UC Berkley Law Professor Khiara Bridges refused to use the word ‘woman’ and accused Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley of being “transphobic” and “inciting violence” for saying men can’t have babies.



Many of them also refused to define what a woman is, with National Women’s Law Center president Fatima Goss-Graves telling Republicans that “You’re trying to suggest that people who don’t identify as women can’t get pregnant.”




Last month all 50 Democrats in the Senate voted against an amendment that sought to define pregnancy as a uniquely biologically female process.


This lunacy isn’t just restricted to woke academics making a scene in Congress, but is translating through to real life with terms including “women” or “mothers” being replaced by doctors in hospitals with “birthing people” or “pregnant people” to appease people with gender dysphoria or just straight up mental illness.
The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine in the U.S. has issued a new guide, advising hospitals and health carers to change their language to be more “gender-inclusive”.
The guide lists “traditional terms” such as ‘breast milk’ and then suggests woke alternatives including “human milk”, “parent’s milk”, and most ridiculously “father’s milk.”
As we highlighted back in June, the NHS in the UK caused controversy by erasing all references to women from an online advice section about the menopause, an exclusively female condition.
During the same month, which by no coincidence was also ‘Pride Month’, the NHS website altered its guidance pages on ovarian cancer, removing instances of the word “women” in a move that sources said was intended to be more “inclusive” toward trans, non-binary and intersex people.
This trend has reached as far as dictionaries literally changing the definition of the word “female” to include anyone who identifies as one.
We also face a future where if you type the ‘wrong’ word, Google will correct your language to help you become more ‘inclusive’.

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

That uis crazy but you know what is really crazy:

53% of Republicans view Trump as true U.S. president
 

ShockNAwww

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2020
774
716
93
If your born at birth as a female with two XX chromosome with a ovaries and uterus and then you become a men by renaming yourself and calling yourself transgender men and start taking male hormones and retain your ovaries and uterus.Obviously biological you are still capable of having a baby. At of this moment no man that born with a XY chromosome and born without ovaries and uteras and have a penis able to have a baby yet as of today. If some distant future ( maybe in decades from now) they able to create a artifical
womb and artificial ovaries and then transplants a live ovaries into a trangender man that will make medical history And able to carry a baby to 12 month then it will make history. Right now it not posssible!
That’s incredibly relevatory. You must inform the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal of your discovery. I’m sure they’ll re-write the Code because of your research.

Not sure how that adds to or takes away from any of the journal articles I linked to though, nor does it explain why you care so much about any of this.

It appears to me like it’s really important for you that cis/biological men have their own category of noun separate from trans men.

Have you considered changing the term for ‘man/men’ to something else now that trans men have successfully co-opted the term?

Maybe give Webster’s a call and make a suggestion for your new preferred noun.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,893
1,664
113
That uis crazy but you know what is really crazy:

53% of Republicans view Trump as true U.S. president
All I know that is debatable… cannot says your 100% wrong and cannot says you are 100% is right. All I know Hunter Biden laptop may have effect the election which NY Time and Washington Post admitted that Hunter laptop is real. That why 53% Repulicans view Trump as true U.S. president.
The fact now stand the real US president as of today recognize legally is Biden!! Remember if you ask democratic who the true US president when Bush beat VP Al Glore with the Florida recount and that gone to to the US Supreme Court that decided on Florida recount On Bush favour.

I bet majority of democratic will says Gore is the true U.S. President! And that is what really scary too! Everything is debatable when you look at from a different angle.
 
Last edited:
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts