Police high command will coveine for a diciplinary hearing of Const. No. 728

paleofreak187

New member
Sep 1, 2012
180
0
0
129. Every one who

(a) resists or wilfully obstructs a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty or any person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer,
(b) omits, without reasonable excuse, to assist a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty in arresting a person or in preserving the peace, after having reasonable notice that he is required to do so, or
(c) resists or wilfully obstructs any person in the lawful execution of a process against lands or goods or in making a lawful distress or seizure,
is guilty of

(d) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
(e) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 118; 1972, c. 13, s. 7.
It's sheep yellow bellied cowards (or cops) like you that are making police both hated and feared but mostly hated.
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,545
1,323
113

The two guys that were arrested in another incident by officer 728 has had their charges suspended

The two men were taking musical instruments into a building and one had a beer just outside the door of the premises. They were roughed up and arrested.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
129. Every one who

(a) resists or wilfully obstructs a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty or any person lawfully acting in aid of such an officer,
(b) omits, without reasonable excuse, to assist a public officer or peace officer in the execution of his duty in arresting a person or in preserving the peace, after having reasonable notice that he is required to do so, or
(c) resists or wilfully obstructs any person in the lawful execution of a process against lands or goods or in making a lawful distress or seizure,
is guilty of

(d) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or
(e) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 118; 1972, c. 13, s. 7.

So then the question becomes what was her duty? (orders). Also, what were her options? Pepper spray is not to be used unless there is a threat to the officer. Unlawful use is criminal assault. Honestly, people like you seem to long for some authoritarian system where you can just get picked up and beaten by authorities with no recourse.
 

shakenbake

Senior Turgid Member
Nov 13, 2003
7,839
1,956
113
Durham Region, Den of Iniquity
www.vafanculo.it
So then the question becomes what was her duty? (orders). Also, what were her options? Pepper spray is not to be used unless there is a threat to the officer. Unlawful use is criminal assault. Honestly, people like you seem to long for some authoritarian system where you can just get picked up and beaten by authorities with no recourse.
But, she seems to be such a fine example from the Montreal Police Force!

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/SPVM+Agent+suspended/7376056/story.html

She should be grateful that the vigilante forces have not gotten to her, yet.
 
Last edited:

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,545
1,323
113
Toronto Escorts