FUCK YES! The people strike back. Spread this. Anonymous is the real revolution. Eat shit you fascist pig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sb0-QF0ew8
nah, leave the kids out of it. as much as i like anonymous, if they had named the kids and the kids got hurt a lot of people would turn on them. kids are the innocent bystanders to what the parents do and have no place in the games that are played on a political level.Thanks for embedding the video! I urge everyone to please contact the people identified in the video's summary (at the youtube page). Vic Toews has gone too far and his stupid ass should resign. Personally, I don't think Anonymous went far enough; they should have named all the kids too.
You mean as in that it is blackmail "do what we demand or we will will release the information"Some will argue that what Anonymous is doing is wrong. Be careful.
Criminal Code of Canada
346. (1) Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.
Totally agree!Anonymous wouldn't exist of our existing media actually did real journalism and revealed all the corrupt bullsh&^ that goes on each day.
BS
they are just telling them to do the right thing. what the bill is proposing is not the right thing.You mean as in that it is blackmail "do what we demand or we will will release the information"
While the Bill may not be the right thing - why it has been sent to Committee BEFORE a Second Reading - so that major rewriting may be done, Blackmail is definitely the wrong way to express displeasure.they are just telling them to do the right thing. what the bill is proposing is not the right thing.
right or wrong they stood up and made them take notice. we, the people that it is going to affect did nothing.While the Bill may not be the right thing - why it has been sent to Committee BEFORE a Second Reading, Blackmail is definately the wrong way to express displeasure.
Says whom? Public displeasure had a huge effect, I don't believe you grasp the difference of sending a Bill to Committee before a Second Reading rather than after one.right or wrong they stood up and made them take notice. we, the people that it is going to affect did nothing.
That is a very morally bankrupt "ends justifies the means" approach you are espousing there.right or wrong they stood up and made them take notice. we, the people that it is going to affect did nothing.
it should have never been introduced in the first place.Says whom? Public displeasure had a huge effect, I don't believe you grasp the difference of sending a Bill to Committee before a Second Reading rather than after one.
knock yourself out, i got nothing to hide. the people that are trying to push this shit into reality though, do.That is a very morally bankrupt "ends justifies the means" approach you are espousing there.
Perhaps the government should threaten to publish all your personal information on the internet if you don't pay your taxes on time...
When the Liberal government of Paul Martin introduced the Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act in November of 2005, it received comparatively little attention. As the columnist Thomas Walkom described it in the Toronto Star, the bill would require Internet and telephone companies “to install equipment that would allow the state to monitor all of their customers… t would give police … the power to demand, without the need for court warrants, any information that [these] companies keep on their customers — including addresses, passwords and credit card information.” The public safety minister at the time, Anne McLellan, was quoted to the effect that the police needed the new powers to go after terrorists and child pornographers.
An important difference don't you think, plead guilty in criminal court. Rather different from either threatening to expose personal information if you didn't file on time, or exposing contents of civil court records if you don't comply with someone's demands.Thunder Bay, Ontario, February 9, 2012 ... The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) announced today that on February 7, 2012, John K. Amoah of Thunder Bay pleaded guilty, in the Ontario Court of Justice in Thunder Bay.