Hear hear. What is the difference between the royals and the Jenner/Kardashians? They are *****, therefore they are ********.
At least Bruce Jenner ahad genuine acomplishments.
Please join me in celebrating Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee anniversary.
- Thread starter rafterman
- Start date
At least Bruce Jenner ahad genuine acomplishments.
might i remind you that using images of the developmentally handicapped in an unsavoury and perceived prejudicial fashion, is not socially acceptable, and if perchance you were enrolled in college or university, would result in your immediate expulsionI think I can explain that for you
However for this thread, rather suitable.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...stine-lacks-education-says-David-Starkey.html
The Queen is a philistine who lacks an education, says David Starkey
David Starkey, an expert on the British monarchy, has reportedly accused the head of state of being a philistine and being poorly educated.
The historian, well-known for his controversial views, claimed in an interview with The Guardian that she is largely uninterested in her predecessors and is only interested in her own reign and how she appears to the public.
When Starkey was showing the Queen round an exhibition he had curated about Elizabeth I in 2003, he claims he found her more occupied with the fact her gin and Dubonnet arrived late, than the works on display. He suggests that her only comment on the exhibition was on one of the objects which was hers.
He said: "She'd looked after them, she'd put in place much better arrangements for their care, but again - I suppose it's this absence of any kind of, to be blunt, serious education."
Referring to her Christmas broadcasts, all of which he has seen, he said: "It's quite fascinating, because her frames of reference to the monarchy, despite this 1,500-year history, are entirely her father and grandfather.
I think i would concede that you feel that your right about everything you argue..... However, in this thread, your soooooooooooooooooooooooo badly outnumbered......but you havent figured that out what so ever and continue making a total fool of yourself. But you are giving us some laughs...so keep it rolling
Take out the Royalty and what is connected with it and what is there left of Great Britain. Their industry is gone, the Empire a long time ago, dropping back more and more in importance, still a financial center but this is declining also ... all that is left is history and memories.........they better hang on to their Queen .......... will be only an unimportant island in another 100 years........
look....the old bitty is pleasant and inoffensive in a grandmotherly way, and that is fine perhaps for Britain, but we in Canada should really establish our own identity and find our own Canadian grandmother/ symbol of state. I nominate Clara Hughes!
Hey look Nicolas Sarkozy is a TERBite! The statement is just as incorrect as when President Sarkozy made it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...zy-claims-UK-industry-cheap-shot-economy.html
i could be wrong, but i doubt we will hear from him any more in this thread..once he finally figures out that everyone in the thread disagrees with him, he moves on and deflects by starting a new thread..hence trying to re-establish some credibility, change the topic and hope this thread dies..thenagain..if he reads THIS..he might feel compelled to have the last word.for some guys,, its always a lose-lose
May I suggest that you look at some polls, as well as the political realities. You are very much in a minority.
Nah, I predict that he will post again. He shares with Fuji the belief that the last poster in a thread wins the argument.
its your idea..run with it..educate us all if you care to... i am especially curious about your notion of political realities and would love to see those realities quantified in a poll or two. Actually, i would love to have you start with your definition of political reality as it relates to the British Lampreys
Waiting to be awestruck and spellbound
Whitewaterguy, this has all been discussed at great length in other threads.
But to start with since you seemingly believe the monarchy is about to depart any second - what do you believe it takes to institute changes regarding the Canadian Crown? Do you believe those to be likely?
But to start with since you seemingly believe the monarchy is about to depart any second - what do you believe it takes to institute changes regarding the Canadian Crown? Do you believe those to be likely?
