Gentleman, The king is dead...long live the king.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/12/media/playboy-ending-fully-nude-photos/index.html
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/12/media/playboy-ending-fully-nude-photos/index.html
As long and they still have to suck and fuck him, what does he care lol...Gentleman, The king is dead...long live the king.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/12/media/playboy-ending-fully-nude-photos/index.html
pretty sure playboy has a large cash reserve so that it has room to experiment. dont think playboy is going bankrupt any time soon. tho i heard a couple years ago that playboy was bankrupt.Wtf...then what the hell is the point of Playboy then?!? I know they've had problems with sales due to the availability of nude photos online for free, etc. But I honestly can't see this as being something that'd improve Playboy's situation.
I believe Hefner was working at Esquire (a men's magazine with no nudes) and then quit to start Playboy. The nudes made the difference then. To his credit, he added very good articles and book summaries among the girl next door type nudes. Instead of skutty nudes by pseudo photographers - he used famous nude photographers with carefully groomed models. Full genital photography came as a response to their first serious competitor (IMO) Penthouse.I only read it for the articles anyway.
Agreed. When I was 14 I once rubbed it out about 5 times in half an hour to Madonna's _Like A Virgin_ music video (watch, stroke, rewind, watch...). I'm sure if I watched it now I'd laugh, but teenage me really enjoyed watching her wriggle around in the front of that gondola.Playboy was great when I was 12. Penthouse was even better.
But the internet......thank Christ it didn't exist when I was a kid orelse I would have never have gone outside. With literally millions of women posing nude on line, why would one buy Playboy for the women?