Fiscal prudence not simply cutting and slashing.
Take marijuana for example.
Social reform to decriminalize marijuana could save billions (?) in federal, and local law enforcement, courts, prisons expenses and not be an "entry" point into the world of criminality for many young people simply because they smoke or sell a weed that is demonstrably less harmful than alcohol. What of the long term economic loss of those who become "criminals" over weed and are permanently disadvantaged for the rest of their lives over a criminal record?
Simple social changes can have economic benefits.
Are conservative policies on sex and marijuana (for example) fiscally prudent?
Really? I'm not so sure (but I hope you're right).He's distancing himself from Harpo in order to run for the leadership of the party, ala John Baird.
Harper is gone after the next election win, lose or draw.
So basically, if I had to pick between the two parties with respect to pure fiscal management, the Trudeau camp is the unknown, so I'd go with the devil I know, lol. However, this doesn't mean that I'll vote for Harper in November.
I agree with a lot of what you said but think there is much more to leading a country than "pure fiscal management".
As red said, they all become corrupt with power and are betrothen to the special interests who put them in power. Two terms is enough for either party before they need to be flushed.
Same as me.Hey Barca, You and I are are in total agreement on this point! I hate them all as well. As a long-time member of the Liberal Party of Canada, I very much doubt that I will be physically able to vote for Junior. And I agree with James in his loathing of the present Conservative regime (And I also agree that Paul Martin was our best PM, at least in recent years). I suppose there's always the NDP....Can anybody come up with a reason to send any of these clowns to heaven, I meant to Ottawa?
Not to mention their idiotic "tough on crime" agenda that is a proven failure in the US and incredibly expensive, destructive and wastefulFiscal prudence not simply cutting and slashing.
Take marijuana for example.
Social reform to decriminalize marijuana could save billions (?) in federal, and local law enforcement, courts, prisons expenses and not be an "entry" point into the world of criminality for many young people simply because they smoke or sell a weed that is demonstrably less harmful than alcohol. What of the long term economic loss of those who become "criminals" over weed and are permanently disadvantaged for the rest of their lives over a criminal record?
Simple social changes can have economic benefits.
Are conservative policies on sex and marijuana (for example) fiscally prudent?
Perhaps a run at being Premier of Nova Scotia.I don't understand why MacKay would be leaving. What does he have lined up that's better for him?
well maybe not, what about meThe worst politician in Canadian history. Back stabbing lyer.
How can you respect a man who called you a pervert and is willing to put you in jail for an act between consenting adults?So what, no one noticed he just had a second kid and has been up there for 18 years?
He may actually be calling it because he has had enough of politics and wants to make money in the private sector for his family.
Either way anyone who chooses to serve that long, whether you agree with his politics or not deserves a at least some respect.
And judging from the humour the PM used when addressing his leaving, it sounds like they are friends.
Yeah I think he's quitting because after C-36, C-51 and increased fines for cannabis, he's run out of law-abiding citizens to easily turn into criminals through the passage of legislation.How can you respect a man who called you a pervert and is willing to put you in jail for an act between consenting adults?