Love triangles that end in murder are usually pretty obvious. I suspect if that's the case it will come out in the trial. They'll connect the dots if there's dots to be connected.
PATH Stabbing Suspect
- Thread starter Corey
- Start date
Love triangles that end in murder are usually pretty obvious. I suspect if that's the case it will come out in the trial. They'll connect the dots if there's dots to be connected.
shakenbake
Senior Turgid Member
I've interacted with her on several occasions over the last 3 years and it was evident she was going bonkers. I've been told she was diagnosed with schizophrenia but refused medication.
And if I may add, she's not that good looking in person.
And if I may add, she's not that good looking in person.
What a tragedy on both sides: a young woman who couldn't get her career going and will likely never work yet still has a mountain of debt and another innocent young lady just starting her life.
S
**Sophie**
Thanks Shake. Maybe she went off the rails.
Too bad, I think she was a nice looking girl.
Could've made a great stripper, perhaps? (just kidding) :happy:
OMG.......I think that means she didnt just try to harm her, she went all out and tried to kill her!! :Eek:
Good luck trying to defend that charge
Thanks zip. Its all starting to make sense now.
Late-onset schizophrenia, perhaps?? Amanda Bynes has the same problem:
http://www.currentpsychiatry.com/ho...-age-60/570f27bea91ee8705cab88f0bd0b1ce2.html
Plain old schizophrenia possibly or major depression with psychosis possibly. Late on-set means past age 60.
I know someone who struggles with mental illness, and had episodes of unreality. I didn't know about Amanda Bynes, but her troubles sound familiar.
The charge is correct. If you intend grevious harm and your victim dies, it's murder. Manslaughter is where you didn't intend anyone to get hurt, but somebody died through your negligence. Stabbing someone isn't negligence.
Like others I expect she'll wind up pleading insanity and be sent to the crazy farm.
Last edited:
If there was a previous diagnosis of mental instability (schizophrenia et al) as others have stated above, it's pretty much a slam dunk that she will get off the hook. All well and good as long as they lock her up for 30 years - jail, or the nuthouse, either is fine with me. The problem is going to be that she gets sent to the loonie-bin and ends up out on the street in 2 or 3 years after "showing progress". (Like that guy who chopped off some guy's head on a bus. He's out now too. All cured and everything....)
Yup, this is the first case that comes to mind and is a likely outcome. If they can somehow prove intent, even though she was diagnosed with a mental illness, can they sentence her for longer.
For killing an innocent she definitely deserves to be put out of a society for a long time despite if she had intent or not.
Its unfortunate that there is a loop hole in the system where patients can use a diagnosis to hurt harm and kill the innocent and get away.
I hope this does not become a trend. This sucks so much as it could have been anyone if there was no intent as her victim.
This is just great....
Here is an interesting G&M post on this...http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...tabbing-to-remain-in-custody/article27844715/
Here is an interesting G&M post on this...http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...tabbing-to-remain-in-custody/article27844715/
The fact that they're considering releasing the guy is just as insane as he is. If he actually gets released I will lose all hope for Canada's justice system.
There's definitely something between these 2 people that we haven't been told about yet.
http://www.cp24.com/news/accused-in...ow-charged-with-first-degree-murder-1.2763562
Similar threads
