The point was generally that the population has lost confidence in this City's ability to:oldjones said:Point is. there's no solution to poverty, and homelessness is just the most abject kind. But if you do give a poor man real money instead of spare change, he doesn't have to clutter up the landscape sitting on a scrap of corrugated w/ his hand out. And if you help him w/ his health and social problems so he can maybe hold a job, you may find he doesn't need your help after awhile. 'Course someone else always will, but the alternatives are keep walking by, or use the Moss Park Method*.
*Kick 'em to death
a) come up with a solution that works or is measurably more effective than what they are currently doing, and;
b) do it an efficient or cost effective manner.
I do agree with you about treating the root cause. Whether that's even possible on this scale is beyond my knowledge level on this topic. In the case of New York I recall reading stories about zero tolerence policies etc. This sounds less like treating a problem to eliminate it and more like forceably solving the problem by making it intolerable to live on the streets, at least those particular streets - if such a thing is possible