Only Three Months Left For Planet Earth( and other false doomsday predictions)

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,630
22,184
113

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,829
4,937
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,630
22,184
113
This is why I cant take global warming seriously. According to this article March in Southern Ontario was warmer than usual (see map below).
If anything I thought March was colder, and now April also seems to be much colder than usual.

Its complete bullshit IMO

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/na...u56eicdrepbmgidaewxxz6va-story.html#nt=barker

Double failure, phil.

1) - The article doesn't say anything about Ontario temps, it talks about global temperatures.
2) - The global map you posted clearly shows that while parts of Eastern Europe were 5ºC warmer, Ontario was about 2ºC cooler than average while the overall global average was about 2ºC warmer

You really shouldn't be in this conversation if you can't read and understand such basic stories and maps.
You should also be embarrassed, no wonder you have to pretend to have me on ignore, you're constantly just proving how ignorant you are.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,829
4,937
113
Snow flurries expected tomorrow with a high of only +3C
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,982
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
No, Warming Is Not Making Southwest Drought Worse

The establishment media is hyping a new paper claiming climate change is contributing to a megadrought throughout the western United States. Federal government data compiled by the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS), however, show the claim is false.

Reporting on the study, published in the journal Science, Doyle Rice writes in USA Today, “[f]ueled in part by human-caused climate change, a ‘megadrought’ appears to be emerging in the western U.S., a study published Thursday suggests. In fact, the nearly-20-year drought is almost as bad or worse than any in the past 1,200 years, scientists say.”

Rice admits megadroughts – intense droughts lasting decades or longer – have been common throughout history. Nevertheless, he quotes A. Park Williams, the Columbia University researcher listed as the lead author of the story, stating, “We now have enough observations of current drought and tree-ring records of past drought to say that we’re on the same trajectory as the worst prehistoric droughts.” The current drought is “a drought bigger than what modern society has seen,” Williams added.

There are a couple of problems with Williams’ assertions. First, as noted by Rice, “Naturally occurring western megadroughts have taken place many times before. In fact, most of the USA’s droughts of the past century, even the 1930s Dust Bowl that forced migrations of Oklahomans and others from the Plains, ‘were exceeded in severity and duration multiple times by droughts during the preceding 2,000 years,’ the National Climate Assessment said.” Therefore, there is no evidence any current drought conditions are at all unusual or caused by anything other than nature.

Second, the 20 year drought Williams and company are warning of doesn’t actually appear to be occurring. Indeed, NIDIS records show 78 percent of the country is not experiencing drought or even below average rainfall at present. In the West, less than half of the region is experiencing below average rainfall, and of regions in the West experiencing drought conditions, the Palmer Drought Index shows, just 3.76 percent of the entire country is experiencing extreme or exceptional drought, concentrated in a small part of South Texas.

NIDIS records also show that much of the area experiencing below average rainfall or modest drought have been experiencing these conditions for 6 months or less, and that moisture conditions have improved over the past week, month, and year for most of the areas currently rated as experiencing drought or “abnormally dry” conditions.

So, the data hardly indicate a megadrought is occurring.

As Climate at a Glance: Drought reports, data shows the United States is undergoing its longest period in recorded history without at least 40 percent of the country experiencing “very dry” conditions, with peaks in drought around 1978, 1954, 1930, and 1900 being much larger than what the U.S. experienced in the 21st century and the late 20th century. Indeed, in 2017 and 2019, the United States registered its smallest percentage of land area experiencing drought in recorded history.

And the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports with “high confidence” precipitation over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) has increased during the past 70 years, while IPCC has “low confidence” about any negative trends globally.

The actual data show the Western United States is not in the midst of a long-term, particularly severe megadrought. This is exactly the opposite of what the researchers who wrote the Science paper concluded. Accordingly, one wonders how this paper got through Science’s “peer review” process.

https://climaterealism.com/2020/04/no-warming-is-not-making-southwest-drought-worse/
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,282
7,941
113
Room 112

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,630
22,184
113
https://climatism.blog/
https://realclimatescience.com/
http://electroverse.net/
http://www.drroyspencer.com/
https://judithcurry.com/

These are the 5 most trustworthy and insightful sources on the topic of climate change today. No agendas. No bullshit. Just the truth.
Some list.
Curry resigned from the AAAS because every legit scientist disagrees with her stance.
Spencer is a bit of quack, another single person source.
Your first link is a blog that thinks there has been no warming for 20 years.

3 unsourced blogs and 2 disrespected scientists.
I'll take the word of NASA, AAAS and every single legit scientific agency in North America over your dodgy list.
 

The LoLRus

Well-known member
Mar 30, 2009
2,270
136
63
1) - The article doesn't say anything about Ontario temps, it talks about global temperatures.
2) - The global map you posted clearly shows that while parts of Eastern Europe were 5ºC warmer, Ontario was about 2ºC cooler than average while the overall global average was about 2ºC warmer
You're so full of shit! No wonder this entire forum has you on ignore

That site is comedy gold.
They think that windmills are warming the US.
https://climaterealism.com/2020/02/harvard-study-finds-wind-turbines-warm-the-u-s/

Fucking hilarious that you buy that bullshit
Wrong again. They merely posted a Harvard study.
The study wasnt conducted by the site itself (and nowhere do they state they agree with the entire study)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,630
22,184
113
You're so full of shit! No wonder this entire forum has you on ignore
Phil is unable to read the articles and charts he posts. He complained that Ontario was cold yet the month was reported as yet another near record warm globally.
He totally failed to understand the difference between global temps and local temps as well as missing the readings in the map he posted that actually agreed with his claim that Ontario was colder than normal while massive other sections of the planet were really very much warmer.

Total failure, and you can't understand that either?


Wrong again. They merely posted a Harvard study.
The study wasnt conducted by the site itself (and nowhere do they state they agree with the entire study)
The study doesn't say what the article claimed.
The study thinks that more land will be necessary and therefore some warming from switching over to wind/solar in total. But it also said that its the best choice, so instead of saying that wind/solar adds warming they are saying there are impacts to wind/solar but its by far the best choice.

“Wind beats coal by any environmental measure, but that doesn’t mean that its impacts are negligible,” said David Keith, the Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and senior author of the papers. “We must quickly transition away from fossil fuels to stop carbon emissions. In doing so, we must make choices between various low-carbon technologies, all of which have some social and environmental impacts.”
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,829
4,937
113
LOL.....there's a snowstorm happening right now downtown Toronto :spit:
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,982
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
BBC Falsely Claims ‘Day After Tomorrow’ Science Has Come True

BC has published an article claiming much of the science in the 2004 climate science fiction film The Day After Tomorrow “hold up remarkably well” to historical analysis.

Readers who are old enough to remember the movie may recall that the premise of the movie was global warming causing a sudden halt to the Gulf Stream and the North Atlantic Current, resulting in all sorts of sudden and horrifying catastrophes.

Yet, the ocean currents have sped up, not slowed down, and the asserted catastrophes have not occurred.

Let’s compare climate science versus the BBC’s attempt to gaslight us into believing absurd climate predictions have come true.

As BBC describes it, “The film starts well, with a climate researcher, Professor Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid), nearly plummeting to his doom in the Antarctic when a mile-long crack splits the ice shelf beneath his feet.

Soon afterward, he explains how the North Atlantic Current works to the US’s skeptical vice president (Kenneth Welsh, a Dick Cheney lookalike).”

Dennis Quaid “explains” to the dolt-like, climate-denier vice president that “global warming is melting the polar ice caps and disrupting this flow [the North Atlantic Current]. Eventually, it will shut down. And when that occurs, there goes our warm climate.”

However, climate scientists recently published peer-reviewed data showing the ocean currents are speeding up rather than slowing down.

Now, of course, climate alarmists falsely claim global warming speeds up ocean currents and they predicted this all along. Like in the movie Gaslight.

Moreover, BBC admits the movie showed, “Hailstones the size of tennis balls batter Tokyo. Tornadoes rip Los Angeles to pieces. Helicopters fall from the sky when their fuel lines freeze in Scotland. A frighteningly convincing tsunami sloshes through Manhattan, submerging its streets and turning its skyscrapers into islands. New York is then buried under meters of snow and ice.”

Yet, none of these events occurred. None are going to occur. The acclaimed “science” was ridiculous in 2004, remains ridiculous today, and will always be ridiculous.

The only people who will believe BBC’s absurd attempt to try to vindicate climate extremism predictions in The Day After Tomorrow are climate charlatans and people BBC can effectively convince are losing their minds.

James Taylor is Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center for Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute.


https://climatechangedispatch.com/bbc-falsely-claims-day-after-tomorrow-science-true/
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,982
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,282
7,941
113
Room 112

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,282
7,941
113
Room 112

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,630
22,184
113
You're the crock. Mikey Moore is right....................for once.
That's some trust in your expert!
Obviously his calls about the US and capitalism are also spot on.
And you must also support his calls for gun control, right?

Or is his work really a crock?
 
Toronto Escorts