Oil Sanctions: Trump's Leverage in Ukraine-Russia Conflict?

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,706
2,159
113
Ghawar
Jan 17, 2025

The Trump administration is currently formulating a sanctions strategy for Russia which might be better able to foster a peace deal in the Ukraine war.

"Advisers to President-elect Donald Trump are crafting a wide-ranging sanctions strategy to facilitate a Russia-Ukraine diplomatic accord in the coming months while at the same time squeezing Iran and Venezuela, people familiar with the matter said," Bloomberg reports.

Ironically the three countries named happen to be among the world's top oil producers - Russia, Iran, and Venezuela - and Trump's team will want to carefully avoid major supply and price disruptions. Iranian and Venezuelan exports actually increased during the period of the Biden administration, a trend that Trump will try and thwart, given talk of returning to 'maximum pressure' toward political change in these so-called 'rogue' states.

Biden's last Friday move to expand sanctions on Russia's energy sector has without doubt thrown some extra complications into Trump's plans to rapidly negotiate an end to the Ukraine war.

The Bloomberg report indicates two main paths or options Trump's team is mulling: 1) if there are indicators that a truce deal is close, then softening and rolling back restrictions for Russian energy producers could be an extra incentive; or 2) building on existing sanctions could be used as additional leverage to induce Putin to agree to a deal.

But as to this latter option, Putin has not backed down even in the face of ratcheting, historic, and far-reaching punitive economic measures by the West.

Hungary's EU minister Janos Boka seems to have acknowledge these 'options' in Thursday remarks: "I think it is only natural that before we decide on the rollover for another six months, we ask the incoming U.S. administration how they see the future of the sanctions regime," he said in Brussels.

But Washington has hopefully perceived by now that its anti-Russian sanctions have by and large not worked, or backfired. In many ways they have only strengthened Moscow's relations and trade with leading BRICS nations like China and India, as well as Iran.

Despite the prior Trump campaign rhetoric of a speedy negotiation track which will reach a permanent truce soon after he enters office, Trump's team has since acknowledge that talks are likely to take much longer.

A Wednesday Reuters report said, "Advisers to President-elect Donald Trump now concede that the Ukraine war will take months or even longer to resolve, a sharp reality check on his biggest foreign policy promise - to strike a peace deal on his first day in the White House."

"Two Trump associates, who have discussed the war in Ukraine with the president-elect, told Reuters they were looking at a timeline of months to resolve the conflict, describing the Day One promises as a combination of campaign bluster and a lack of appreciation of the intractability of the conflict and the time it takes to staff up a new administration," the report continued.

Both EU and Biden administration officials have long sought to 'Trump-proof' certain pro-Ukraine policies. But this has had the side effect of making the chance for peace in Ukraine much more complex and difficult. Sanctions remain a key part of this complexity.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,706
2,159
113
Ghawar
China's Support for Russia Strains Ties with Europe

Jan 16, 2025

Former Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis offered a clear warning for those who say that China is able to mediate an end to the war in Ukraine.

Finding Perspective: Speaking to the French international affairs outlet Geopolitique.eu, Landsbergis stamped down the idea.

“China is waiting for a moment of weakness to step in and offer ‘solutions’ and I fear that some in Europe would accept this offer because it’s a cheap alternative to us stepping up, in the same way that you buy a Chinese car because it’s cheaper. The same goes for their peace proposals.”

Landsbergis was commenting on a recent interview with outgoing U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and The New York Times, where Blinken said that one of the reasons that Moscow had not escalated into a nuclear war in Ukraine was because of China.

“If you follow that line of reasoning, it means that China has become a protector of Europe. That would be the beginning of a new paradigm,” Landsbergis said.

“If we accept that China, which in my view supports Russia and is therefore an adversary of the countries supporting Ukraine, is now the guarantor of nuclear deterrence on our continent, it would be a dangerous mistake and a failure.”

Why It Matters: Landsbergis’s warning comes as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump takes office and Europe anxiously looks at a very different geopolitical reality.

Trump’s tariff threats and less traditional approach to Washington’s relationship with Europe is a source of consternation in European capitals and there is talk in some corners about having a more amenable position toward Beijing to balance the Trump administration.

On January 14, Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke with European Council President Antonio Costa to begin what many analysts
believe will be a charm offensive from Beijing toward the continent.

But while Trump may have a rockier relationship with Brussels and various capitals than his predecessor, Beijing is also facing a different playing field than when U.S. President Joe Biden took office.

China’s support for Russia amid the war in Ukraine has strained ties with Europe, and Brussels is taking aim at Chinese companies in some sectors, a trend that looks set to continue.

EU High Representative Kaja Kallas has also voiced strong criticism of China, especially for its stance around the war in Ukraine and its long-term repercussions.

Landsbergis shared similar sentiments, saying that “Ukraine is central to what will happen in the future” between China and Taiwan.

“I mentioned earlier that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin has managed to change the nuclear doctrine by getting us to accept, at least for now, that resisting an attack is a form of escalation and therefore a nuclear strike is justified.”

“One can imagine a situation where China imposes a blockade, even a partial one, on Taiwan and they resist and we try to lift it, then China could use the Russian playbook,” he said. “I don’t think we collectively understand how reckless it is.”

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,706
2,159
113
Ghawar
Russia Takes Control of Ukrainian Lithium Mines

Jan 14, 2025

Russia has captured two of Ukraine's four lithium deposits since it launched its all-out invasion in 2022, potentially depriving Kyiv of a key economic resource.

On January 11, Russia claimed to have seized control of Shevchenko, a rural settlement in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. The settlement sits on top of one of Ukraine's biggest lithium deposits.

Experts say Russia's seizure of Ukraine's lithium deposits could impact the rest of Europe and the Continent's efforts to shift to green energy.

Described as "white gold," lithium is a critical material for batteries used in devices ranging from smartphones and laptops to electric vehicles.

Ukraine has an estimated 500,000 tons of untapped lithium, one of the largest reserves in Europe, according to geological surveys.

Rod Schoonover, a national security expert and founder of the U.S.-based Ecological Futures Group, said it is unlikely that seizing Ukraine's lithium deposits was a major war objective for Moscow. Russia itself has significant reserves.

Still, Ukraine's mineral wealth is one reason the country is important to Russia, experts say.

The Ukrainian Shield, an ancient and massive rocky plate spanning much of central and southern Ukraine, contains valuable minerals like iron and lithium as well as rare earth metals.

The European Union has looked to secure local supplies of critical raw materials like lithium and lessen its dependence on foreign suppliers, including China.

Lithium is key to Europe's efforts to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and transition to green energy.

With its substantial reserves and proximity, Ukraine stands out as a promising partner, Schoonover said.

"The Russian invasion has disrupted any progress toward leveraging Ukraine's reserves, but if stability is restored, these resources could become, in time, a cornerstone of Europe's strategic autonomy in critical minerals," he said.

 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,838
1,625
113
Sanctions can slow down Russian oil a bit but not stop it. And if they succeed too well the oil price will rise as it is already doing. They sanctioed a whole score of tankers. Now those tankers will be renamed and transferered in panama and be back in action in a few weeks, They can also run without transponders and then dio ship to ship transfers to a non sanctioned tanker that blends 49% russian oil with 51% other oil and calls it non RUssian. They can also ship oil to Iran, Saudi, Qatar and those countries just export more domestic oil and use the Russian oil locally and remit payment to Russia for "services" or they do barter in gold. etc. Its a bit cumbersom but not stoppable. If it gets too aggressive, Russia could just start seizing ships in retaliation with a court order just as the USA does. Russia has lots of cause to directly strike NATO targets today, they have stated their criteria and many strikes on Russia have met that critera. The ONLY reason IMHO they have helb back, is Trumps stated committement to end the war. Putin does want to give it a chance. He is probably assuming that Trump does not wanna start his term with a massive war escalation. If Trump uses pressure tactics, things will heat up in Ukraine and elsewhere. The Iranian President is meeting with Putin today. Perhaps the Russians will provide the HOuthis the means to wipe out RAF Akratori. Not on NATO territory, for example
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts