Obama: Republicans blocking progress in Congress

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Bottom feeding, corporatist GOPers will pay for their corporate bootlicking and obstruction BIGTIME next election!...:cool:

Obama says GOP making life harder for the jobless

AP 2 mins ago

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Saturday pinned blame on Republicans for making life harder for the unemployed and for those who could lose their jobs without new federal intervention. He did so even as he sought to distance himself from the "dreary and familiar politics" of Washington.

Capping a week in which the administration scored a victory — a $20 billion fund to be paid by BP for the victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill — Obama reserved his radio and Internet address to focus on the work that didn't get done.

His main concern was the rejection of a bill in the Senate that would have provided more money for the long-term unemployed, aid for strapped state governments and the renewal of popular tax breaks for businesses and individuals.

"If this obstruction continues, unemployed Americans will see their benefits stop," Obama said. "Teachers and firefighters will lose their jobs. Families will pay more for their first home. All we ask for is a simple up or down vote. That's what the American people deserve."

The broad economic bill failed Thursday when Democrats could not muster the 60 votes needed to end debate. The 56-40 vote fell four shy of the total required to break the GOP filibuster. Republicans support many of the policies in the legislation but are demanding changes to shrink its toll on the deficit.

"Americans want us to show we're serious about lowering the debt, so the president and his allies in Congress have a choice to make: they can either vote to reduce the deficit, or they can lock arms and dig an even deeper hole of debt," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

The standoff again revealed the gaps between the Democratic president and the Republican congressional leaders on how to solve the nation's problems.

Obama was at the same time branding the opposition party as obstructionist while seeking a higher level of debate from his own party and Republicans.

"We have an obligation to care for the next generation," Obama said. "So I hope that when Congress returns next week, they do so with a greater spirit of compromise and cooperation. America will be watching."

In his address, Obama also bemoaned the stalling of a separate measure that would lift a $75 million liability cap on economic damages for companies such as BP during disasters like the Gulf oil spill. The Senate is considering a bill to increase that cap to $10 billion.

And Obama also said Republicans are the ones at fault for preventing votes on his nominees to key positions in the government. Former President George W. Bush often had the same complaint about Democratic lawmakers.

Republicans used their weekly address to claim that the president has been too slow to react to the threats posed by the Gulf oil spill and that some steps taken by his administration will do more harm than good.

"I'm glad President Obama is finally putting this catastrophe at the top of his agenda, but his response has been too slow," Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi said. Wicker criticized Obama for pushing for an energy bill and increases in oil cleanup fees and for calling for a moratorium on deep-water drilling, which he said would cost jobs and raise the price of energy.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
When did the Republicans become the majority???

Must be another liber lie from you
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
When did the Republicans become the majority???

Must be another liber lie from you
Are you even remotely aware of how the system works, or in many cases, doesn't?
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,497
4,903
113

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Are you even remotely aware of how the system works, or in many cases, doesn't?
I fully understand that unless several people in Washington have others to fault they are not happy.

You seem to think the people we elect give a damn about the American people.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
I fully understand that unless several people in Washington have others to fault they are not happy.

You seem to think the people we elect give a damn about the American people.
Feeling a bit bitter today aren't we? As far as what Obama was talking about let me give you an example. There is an arcane senate procedure known as a "secret hold". With it a single Senator can halt any progress on appointments or legislation without having to reveal their identity. Supposedly that Senator would have to come out of hiding within six days and show themselves, but the hold is simply transferred to another Senator before the deadline and so it goes, like a ping pong match. Republicans have gone nuts using secret holds in the last year and a half. At this point in his presidency George W. had only 13 nominations pending for more than 2 days. Obama has 120, most of them under a secret hold.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,137
7,747
113
Room 112
Why are you blaming the Republicans? The 3/5 majority is the rules of the Senate and they have been used by the Dems more than GOP'ers over the course of time. The Dems have 57 Senators and there are 2 independents who lean more towards their party. It shouldn't be so hard to get the 60 necessary votes if a bill is worthwhile.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Why are you blaming the Republicans? The 3/5 majority is the rules of the Senate and they have been used by the Dems more than GOP'ers over the course of time. The Dems have 57 Senators and there are 2 independents who lean more towards their party. It shouldn't be so hard to get the 60 necessary votes if a bill is worthwhile.
Because often times the bill or appointment never make it to the floor for a vote. Read my post above.

Additionally Senators can attach a completely unrelated measure to a bill, knowing it would not be approved in a floor vote, with the intent of killing the orignal bill. There have been attempts to do away with secret holds but as yet the votes aren't there. It takes 2/3, or 67 Senators, to approve a rule change.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Pappy? Any more questions on how the process works? You, otb, and others like to pretend that given their numbers in Congress and with a siiting President, the Democrats can do anything they please. This is horseshit. If a minority party wants to obstruct a bill or an appointment it's not that hard to do. And this is exactly the tactic of the Republicans. They don't want to see anything achieved. They simply want to stalemate anything being done.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Why are you blaming the Republicans? The 3/5 majority is the rules of the Senate and they have been used by the Dems more than GOP'ers over the course of time. The Dems have 57 Senators and there are 2 independents who lean more towards their party. It shouldn't be so hard to get the 60 necessary votes if a bill is worthwhile.
Ditto.

Boo Hoo, as though the Democrats haven't done this before themselves in the past. As the two year Senator that he was, the President never as told about such matters by HIS party leader - yeh right.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
LOL

59 Senators caucus with the Dems and he can't get 60 votes... what does that tell you.....

The moderate Dems who are afraid of facing the voters are waffling and THE ONE blames the GOP... classic.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
bottie you are as clueless as your blockhead daddy JAJA!....:p
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Must be another liber lie from you
If we want to see LIES all we need do is read your Lame Lies you posted in your Mario son thread!....:rolleyes:
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
So we're suppose to borrow money from the Chinese to send welfare to irresponsible states, fund tax credits and extend unemployment benefits beyond 75 weeks?

At what point will this pinhead realize that a 10% of GDP deficit is an issue to be taken seriously....

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Where are ALL those jobs you Corporatist lickspittles promised were coming to replace all those good paying USA jobs YOU sent to commies in RED China???....:rolleyes:
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Maybe Obama needs to examine the things he is trying to push down the throats of the American people and then look in the mirror for the problem.
 

anomandar

Expert
Aug 30, 2006
909
0
0
T-dot
You seem to think the people we elect give a damn about the American people.
U mean the people that have been selected for u to elect.... Its only an illusion of choice.

But ill give u the last part, no one gives a damn about the people.
 

hardy2003

Member
May 21, 2003
570
0
16
Where are ALL those jobs you Corporatist lickspittles promised were coming to replace all those good paying USA jobs YOU sent to commies in RED China???....:rolleyes:
Peckerface, it must be so wonderful to have such a simple mind. It's all the guys who do don't like's fault. No complexity, no shades of grey, no random bad luck, no unforseeable consequences. Just a simple little world where everyone is left or right and the left is perfect and the right is pure evil. How pathetic; how boring.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
hardly you channeling JAJA now???
Your hardly making any sense at all!.....

The BASIC problem is the MILIONS of jobs LOST to your commie pals in RED China!
It's sooooo simple only a fool couldn't see!....:rolleyes:
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
hardly you channeling JAJA now???
Your hardly making any sense at all!.....

The BASIC problem is the MILIONS of jobs LOST to your commie pals in RED China!

It's sooooo simple only a fool couldn't see!....:rolleyes:
It is funny woody, when manufacturing jobs were being lost through the 1970's and 80's, the TECH sector said our workers need to retain themselves for tech jobs.

Now that the TECH jobs are being exported what do retrain them for??? Social Service workers?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts