To clarify my point, the main argument that you were supporting is that it is easier for NZ to have few cases of covid since it is a remote island with a small population. Another person compared it to Hawaii to show that being an island with a smaller population doesn't mean that it is easier to keep your cases down. You supported this by saying that what makes Hawaii different from NZ is that it is a major tourist destination.
My argument is that it is not easier for NZ compared to Hawaii to manage the pandemic and that tourist numbers are irrelevant especially after the pandemic. Both places saw a huge reduction in the number of visitors. Hawaii and New Zealand, in April 2020, both saw ~99% reduction in visitors, down to a few thousand. 4,564 to Hawaii(
source), 1,721 for NZ(
source). In August this was 7,842 in NZ compared to 22,344 in Hawaii.
The influx of new people in my uneducated estimation seems almost insignificant for both compared to the hundreds of thousands that have come at the same time in previous years. But Hawaii could have always restricted it more because controlling entry to both places is equally easy with both of them being islands.
NZ also has a much larger population (4.9 million) compared to Hawaii (1.4 million). So, the risk of community spread is greater for NZ due to a larger population.
Based on all this, I don't think it's easier for NZ to manage the pandemic compared to Hawaii.
EDIT: Goddamnit, I spent so much time on an irrelevant internet conversation.