Keep it open while they are still giving it to u .... the rate will drop and 2.5 % u will be paying could pay off maxing your Regiserted investments and such and tax time... pay it off and in the long run make money....
You still will need to pay the interest, however, it will be fuck all.tboy said:I don't know if anyone suggested this or not, but to avoid the Inactive fee, just use it for $100.00 then put it back in the next day.
There, no inactive fee.
When I had an LOC the only time I paid any interest was if I kept a balance (negative) from one month to the next. If I remember there was a small service charge per transaction but I remember it being so small as to be non-existant.james t kirk said:You still will need to pay the interest, however, it will be fuck all.
You might as well take out 300, call your favourite SP and then pay it back when due. Probably would be about $301.00 when due.
I'd be amazed if it was still there because I opened a nonsecured LOC from BMO about a year aog when they sent me a teaser in the mail for a LOC at Prime +1.00.Tony2Tap said:I haven't used my PLC from BMO in over 10 years. I haven't paid a cent in fees.
here here!james t kirk said:It would depend on two things.
1. What is your rate of interest?
2. Would you be able to get another one when the time comes?
You see, I recently wanted to up my LOC limit. My old LOC had an interest rate of Prime + 0.00 (It was secured against my house).
When the credit shit happened, I figured I better get at it. They told me that the new LOC (secured) would have an interest rate of Prime + 1.00 and that they (RBC) were no longer doing LOC at Prime + 0.00. Long story short, I busted balls and said, "I already have Prime +0.00, all I want is a higher limit. They went for it.
So, if you have a LOC at Prime +0.00, you close it, you won't get it again at that rate (at least as far as I am aware.)
If your LOC is unseured and at Prime + 3.00, then who cares.
2. You may have gotten your LOC when times were good and banks were looking to loan money. That HAS CHANGED. (Notice how few unsolicited credit card teasers you're getting in the mail now??)
So, if you close your exist LOC, you may not get another one.
If the answer to either question gives you pause for thought, then keep the damn thing open.
Credit is good. Using credit too much and getting in over your head - bad.
I think the bank also has to allocate some of its regulatory capital against the LOC, so our TERBIE friend is tying up some of the TD's valuable capital.viking1965 said:I'm certainly no defender of the banks, but there is some reasonable rationale behind the fee.
I got the letter today from TD. I haven't used it since 1999. So I will cancel it. Further they raised the rate from prime +3.25 to +3.5. I have another line of credit at the Royal that I haven't used in 5 years with a better rate and a higher limit.1HandInMyPocket said:I have a line of credit, which I have not used. Would it be wise to close this account since my bank (TD) will be starting a inactive fee ($35) in a few months? Or is a line of credit necessary, like a credit card and thus this fee a necessary evil?
Thanks in advance,
1Hand
It never hurts to keep one in your back pocket. I work for a financial institution (one of the big 6 banks) and I've seen many clients who cancelled their LOC (Line of Credit) and later tried to apply for one when they needed it and was denied.hungry said:I got the letter today from TD. I haven't used it since 1999. So I will cancel it. Further they raised the rate from prime +3.25 to +3.5. I have another line of credit at the Royal that I haven't used in 5 years with a better rate and a higher limit.
What type of bank do you deal with? "Loan Shark Bank Of Canada"??? *LOL* No, there should never be a fee to apply for anything... a LOC is free - period. Sounds like you're getting scammed, or the customer service rep has no clue what she's talking about.1HandInMyPocket said:FYI, the lady at the help desk also told me that to apply for a LOC would require ~$150 fee, just to apply.