NDP attacks Liberals

spankingman

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2008
3,639
321
83
The NDP under Jack "I wanna be PM "Layton have commenced a series of ads against Iggy and his Liberals for bailiing on the Coalition. Probably the only way little Jackie would EVER get a Cabinet Seat!! A lot of NDPers have had it with Jack so it seems

Heres another little tidbit
MPs. get a housing allowance and as a Party Leader more than an MP so how come Jackk AND Olivia Chow his wife who live under the SAME roof qualify?

Oh Oh sounds like double dipping to me!!!

You can bet if that was anotherParties two MPs doing that the NDP would be all over it like horse shit on straw!

I "USED" to be an NDP Supporter but after the BOB RAE fiasco in the 90's NEVER AGAIN. Even Rae saw the light and switched parties!!
 
spankingman said:
MPs. get a housing allowance and as a Party Leader more than an MP so how come Jackk AND Olivia Chow his wife who live under the SAME roof qualify?

Oh Oh sounds like double dipping to me!!!

That's old news for Wacko Jacko and his wife O-Chow... if memory serves, back when they were both TO counselors- wasn't it discovered that they were living in "subsidized" (AKA government sponsored) housing?!:rolleyes:
 
Difficult times...another election now would ruin the Libearls and NDP..they are broke! That is what Harper is counting on..
Libs. can makea stink..but they have to hold their noses and put up with the status quo, or else they woulfd be wiped out...the NDP, all talk...it is cheap to talk...it would cost them money for anything else!
 
It seems things never change, when the Laytons were on city council they lived in subsidised housing while making 80 odd grand each. The place they lived was wage subsidised but they were still paying a lot less than market, and the unit could have gone to someone who really needed it.

Smiling JAck never saw a cause that he could not get behind ... provided of course it moved his career ahead. He has never had a job that did not depend on the public purse and I suppose you do get what you pay for.
 
landscaper said:
It seems things never change, when the Laytons were on city council they lived in subsidized housing while making 80 odd grand each. The place they lived was wage subsidized but they were still paying a lot less than market, and the unit could have gone to someone who really needed it.

Like I said in Post #2...
 
We should be all grateful for Jack

His posturing is reinforcing the irrelevancy of the NDP party and driving away all but the stalwarts!
 
Shades said:
His posturing is reinforcing the irrelevancy of the NDP party and driving away all but the stalwarts!

And that is a huge shame. Every vote for the NDP is one less vote for the Liberals, and moves the Conservatives that much closer to a majority. Go Jack go. Vote for Jack, he's the best.
 
Actually Jack Layton was best spoken guy at any of the previous debates before the last election.

Any idiot can run major deficits and compromise our future (ex: Harper)

Would you prefer Michael "Ivory Tower" Ignatieff". Surely a guy who spends over 25 years at Oxford and Harvard is in touch with the needs of Canadians?(sarcasm).

Puppet 1, Puppet 2, or Layton. There's no comparison.
 
Layton's just put another nail in his own coffin.

I predict he'll be out before the end of the year.

Impassioned, yes. Intelligent, yes. But he can't deliver when it's needed - during an election campaign.

Time to go, Jack.
 
Plan B said:
Actually Jack Layton was best spoken guy at any of the previous debates before the last election.

Any idiot can run major deficits and compromise our future (ex: Harper)

Would you prefer Michael "Ivory Tower" Ignatieff". Surely a guy who spends over 25 years at Oxford and Harvard is in touch with the needs of Canadians?(sarcasm).

Puppet 1, Puppet 2, or Layton. There's no comparison.

What the hell do you think would happen if Layton (or any NDPer) ever actually WON a Federal election?

(Here's a hint, think back to Ontario in the period 1990 to 1995)

The reality is, Layton (or any NDP leader) can say anything they want, promise anything they want, because they KNOW that there is a million to one shot they will ever have to deliver. It used to be 1000 to 1, but then Rae hit that 1 in a 1000 jackpot and had an "oh shit" moment :o , when he realized he could never hope to deliver on all the promises he had made.
 
I never had much against Layton, until he got into bed with the Bloq. What a cocksucking move that was . All I can say to Layton is, "Scrub really hard, you just got into bed with a dirty nasty whore"
 
hoser1970 said:
What the hell do you think would happen if Layton (or any NDPer) ever actually WON a Federal election?

(Here's a hint, think back to Ontario in the period 1990 to 1995)

The reality is, Layton (or any NDP leader) can say anything they want, promise anything they want, because they KNOW that there is a million to one shot they will ever have to deliver. It used to be 1000 to 1, but then Rae hit that 1 in a 1000 jackpot and had an "oh shit" moment :o , when he realized he could never hope to deliver on all the promises he had made.

Geez, almighty. First of all Bob Rae was and is an asshole. True enough..but Jack doesn't speak down to voters the way Rae did. They're really completely different.
A huge deficit which Mr. Harper will bring to us is not in the interest of Canadians
 
Wow!! How clueless can one man be???

Plan B said:
A huge deficit which Mr. Harper will bring to us is not in the interest of Canadians

!!!!!

And you think the NDP are fiscally conservative? Do you think Jack would reduce spending???? Good grief!!!!!
 
CapitalGuy said:
!!!!!

And you think the NDP are fiscally conservative? Do you think Jack would reduce spending???? Good grief!!!!!
No way the NDP is fiscally conservative.

Same goes for the Harper Conservatives. And the Mulroney ones. And the Campbell ones (all 30 seconds of them). And the Clark ones. And...
 
Ignatieff is not in touch with the average Canadian....what politician is? Personally, I don't vote for someone like me...I want someone better than me to represent me. That's why we have a representative democracy. Send the smartest people to represent you...not the average ones. The US thought that Bush represented the average American. Well, the man was an idiot and look how far that got them. Now, the main reason that Obamania is upon us is because he is recognized as an intellectual - its cool to be smart again in the US. I'll let history judge whether or not he is the genius they portray him to be. But with the economic reality that we have upon us...whom would you rather have - the Harvard/Oxford professor....or the guy from Richview Collegiate. Hmmmm.


PS...Layton's a knob with an ugly wife.
 
CapitalGuy said:
!!!!!

And you think the NDP are fiscally conservative? Do you think Jack would reduce spending???? Good grief!!!!!

Jack Layton couldn't possibly do a poorly as Harper did with his budget. You call $85 Billion in projected deficits by 2013 being fiscally responsible???

Are you out of your mind????
 
Plan B said:
Jack Layton couldn't possibly do a poorly as Harper did with his budget. You call $85 Billion in projected deficits by 2013 being fiscally responsible???

Are you out of your mind????

No, I didn't say Harper was being fiscally responsible. But if it makes you feel better to put words in my mouth....

But.....Layton's defecit would be at least triple that. Probably more. And his spending spree would be compounded by reduced GDP from all the companies his loopy policies would chase out of Canada, or simply put out of business. But, at least those Canadians who contribute nothing to our society would have more welfare money in their pockets, and of course our criminal and terrorist friends would have more freedom and rights here in Canada.

Fortunately, the lefties will never be anything other than a political sideshow, so we don't have to worry about their irresponsible plans to ruin our fine nation.

God bless.