My Life

Fay

naughty lady of the night
Jan 19, 2004
156
0
0
if it was up yer arse, you'd know.
Um, I don't want to be a kill-joy or anything, or get all controversial, but that was actually kind of upsetting.

Did I accidentally get taken to the wrong place with that first link? A cartoon-story about some old guys who beat and rape some girl, thus impregnating her, and her bastard offspring grows up and marries some woman, works his ass off, finds his wife cheating on him, grows old, and then (presumeably) continues the cycle of taking out his misery by beating some girl with his cane and raping her? Do I have this right?

Guys? Why was that cool? Maybe this is just a touchy subject for me for personal reasons...... that I'm sure many ladies would relate to.

-F
 

EnergizerBunny

rhythmic member
Fay said:
Um, I don't want to be a kill-joy or anything, or get all controversial, but that was actually kind of upsetting.

Did I accidentally get taken to the wrong place with that first link? A cartoon-story about some old guys who beat and rape some girl, thus impregnating her, and her bastard offspring grows up and marries some woman, works his ass off, finds his wife cheating on him, grows old, and then (presumeably) continues the cycle of taking out his misery by beating some girl with his cane and raping her? Do I have this right?

Guys? Why was that cool? Maybe this is just a touchy subject for me for personal reasons...... that I'm sure many ladies would relate to.

-F
Fay you actually have a very good point. When I first saw the 'toon, it cracked me up (existential satire). Before posting it, I thought about the issue you are bringing up. Would any of us condone rape? Certainly not! Should rape (date rape etc) never be discussed, or should it never be a subject for satire? Good question. I guess each one of us will have to answer that question individually. Certainly many in our society would be just as offended by the second link.

That reminds me of a story told by the painter Renoir. A duke had a chef who made the best sauces and thus was nicknamed "the sauce is choking me" because everyone would stuff themselves on his sauces. (Maybe it is lost in translation) Anyway, the duke had a daughter who was very attractive, and one night the chef climbed into bed with her and raped her. She managed to cry out "the sauce is choking me", which her father heard and replied, "well you shouldn't have eaten so much". Should Renoir never have told this story? Was it a different time then?

Are some subjects just too taboo? A very good question and you have a very valid point. If anyone was offended, I apologize.
 

Fay

naughty lady of the night
Jan 19, 2004
156
0
0
if it was up yer arse, you'd know.
Thanks, EB, personal POV is respected and appreciated. :)

Myself, I just didn't know how to read that one. That kind of subject matter is so, well, subjective depending on who you are and how you've experienced the world. Because we still live in a place where "No, rape should not be outright condoned", many, many people still don't take it very seriously or sensitively and there still is a lot of male-oriented celebratory attitudes of conquering women sexually, and in far too many cases you see this attitude reaching logical extremes beyond the fairly innoccent triumph of winning her affection and making her cum. I've seen group mentality get carried away to idealizing non-consent, I've seen otherwise "normal" guys get pumped on that attitude and it was really scary. It's not as simple as just saying "Yeah, but those guys are idiots, most guys aren't like that" because it really is a much wider societal problem maintained by a particular social climate. It becomes a part of living for girls. When we are attacked, it's not for our wallets and it's not for an ego-fight outside the night-club. Despite all the moves for equality, the power dynamic is still overwhwelmingly in favour of males, while women remain the target of a lot of random violence just for being born with the wrong chromosomes and genitals, and there's still a lot of "blame the victim" going on, and a lot of "that's part of life, kiddo, get used to it and stop complaining". I think it was a US senator that said not so long ago while golfing, something to the effect of 'The weather is like rape: if ya can't stop it ya might as well just lay back and try to enjoy it somehow' or something in that vein. I remember some guy trying to drag me off froma bus stop once, I struggled to break free, he wouldn't let go, he was bruising my arm, the people at the bus stop (mostly business baby-boomers and some old folks) just stood there, vocally saying stuff like "Hey, leave her alone. That's not nice" but the guy wouldn't let go, so I stuck my thumb into his eye and pushed him away, just as the bus was coming thank goodness. He stumbled backwards all confused and holding his eye, and you know what the response from the slack-jaws at the bus stop (not that I was looking for one) "Oh, hey! You really hurt him, that's not very nice! You shouldn't have done that, you know. Tsk, tsk" See, apparently good women are supposed to just let violent things happen to them, fighting back is not accepted by a lot of people in society, despite what the day-time talk shows will tell you. But I digress....

You're totally right about Renoir's time being a different time, and violence is a clutural construction that means different things to different people in different times, that's true. Also, ideologies and cultural mainstream will reflect the structure of a stratified power dynamic. Whoever occupies the top priviledged rung in society will have the loudest and most widely "accepted" voice. In some times and places, rape was more of an insult than a violent crime (in the eyes of the majority) and could be repaired by marriage of the victim to the perpetrator, because the real crime was the loss of virginity and the ruining of a potential bride-worth. But it's hard for many, like me, with my own totally rooted biases of today based on my own experiences and personal reality, to look back on Renoir's time and experience it without viewing through the curent cultural lense. Sometimes I can do it for, oh, like, 30 seconds! I'm working on it, because I love history, and I realise that you can't go reading and judging history with a load of modern assumptions and sensibilities.


To be continued.....
 

Fay

naughty lady of the night
Jan 19, 2004
156
0
0
if it was up yer arse, you'd know.
......continued


(sorry this is so long, guys, I just don't want to be misunderstood. I know these long posts get tiresome)

Now, I should know better than to wear any emotions on my sleeve on this site, but I'll share with you anyway incase it helps anyone to understand this point of view. I know you guys might admonish me for being overly sensitive, but it actually had me shaking and on the verge of tears. Because with guys who joke about stuff like that, I always wonder how thin the line is. How thin is the line between "no, no, I know sexual assault is wrong, I learned about that in school" and "Maybe, just maybe I could get away with it. If she's passed out, I could just.... if no one ever knows.....who would believe her anyway.....she won't tell....." because they don't recongnize it as being a seriously harmful thing, or if they do then they see it as being something that girls just deal with anyway, no big deal if they wake up all sticky and bruised and confused, that's the way things are and girls must be used to it by now. It really sat badly with my stomach that there might be people around this community who openly say "Hah! That's hilarious!" without seeing the sad part but identify with the male protagonist in the 'toon in a celebratory manner. A little scary for someone who just may end up being sent to one of these guys some night, know what i mean? It actually had me shaking and on the edge of tears.

But I totally appreciate your explanation, EB, it helps to know that you had actually given the matter a thought, and it helps to know what angle you're coming from. I totally see that, and can admit that I also have my sardonic, Jonathan Swift humour about other things that aren't as touchy to me, but might be touchy to others if they don't know where I'm coming from.

Interesting.

-F
 

EnergizerBunny

rhythmic member
Fay said:
...... It actually had me shaking and on the edge of tears.

But I totally appreciate your explanation, EB, it helps to know that you had actually given the matter a thought, and it helps to know what angle you're coming from. I totally see that, and can admit that I also have my sardonic, Jonathan Swift humour about other things that aren't as touchy to me, but might be touchy to others if they don't know where I'm coming from.

Interesting.
Again I am sorry that it affected you that way. Actually it was a very sad piece in many ways and there in lie the twisted 'dark' comedy; like the poor bastard living like a mouse on a wheel because his wife wanted $ and security and then she cheated on him.

One other note, rape is not entirely gender specific. We (men) make many jokes about "don't drop the soap in the shower" and prison bitches. None of these things are funny in reality, but ... I think that we understand each other. :) Everything that you wrote I totally agree with.
 
G

Gord's Bro

Fay's Comments

As a male I've often wondered about the inequity between the sexes. I think your very articulate and passionate comments, Fay, demonstrate how much of a reality this is.

The act of making love itself tends to put the male in a position of power, since the woman is "surrendering" her body to him.

I don't necessarily like this theory or even subscribe to it (and I suspect I will get a lot of angry comments!!) but it's something that's puzzled me . . .

G's B
 

pool

pure evil
Aug 20, 2001
4,747
1
0
Fay,

My initial reaction to the same aspect you took offence to, was that it almost turned my stomach, but at the same time I saw it as pointing out very much the same type of thing that you have expanded on very eloquently. The aspect of the male in the wheelchair condoning the act of rape in revenge, out of what appears to be bitter, misogynistic and totally skewed motives, seems to be part of the focus in the video. Either that or just the male bonding element, in that, although rape ( sexual molestation ) is condemned on the surface, there is that underlying element that rape is justifiable or "OK" at some level.

I can see why you would focus on that aspect, but it's only one aspect of the overall message the way I perceive it. From my perception, it points out the tragedy and mundane, conveyor belt, mindless, lifestyle that many of us follow in life, and all for what ? I found the symbolism of the ankh, which many know to be the symbol of life, falling away to reveal the cross and in the process hitting our stick-man character in the head interesting. There's also the bird's life being taken as a consequence and no one even notices. The typical social setting for the mating dance. The "irony" of a child born out of rape being drawn to the convention of marriage then screwed over etc etc

The "video" basically exposes some of life's tragedies, monotonous cycles as well as questioning social, moral and ethical programming. It shows how pathetic life can be, while we just mindlessly become conditioned and desensitised. To me, that is cool.

I know I'm not pointing out anything that isn't fairly obvious, and that you focused on that aspect, because it was that which offended you, but I just wanted to explain as to why I responded the way I did previously.

I may have questioned the motive behind posting it more, if it hadn't been Energiser B who posted it, and the title he used, but I know him to be a very critical ( in the good sense ) and aware person ( for the most part ... hehe )

It is highly subject to interpretation though and easily could have a different effect on someone else. I see it as dark satire expressed in a somewhat light hearted and clever manner while others may not.

I really like this link and it's a pretty cool song too. I actually sent it to some friends who I know would appreciate it. For the record, I never forward any of the usual asinine attachments that people might send me.
 

Fay

naughty lady of the night
Jan 19, 2004
156
0
0
if it was up yer arse, you'd know.
Wow, thank you guys so much for expanding on this, it helps a great deal. And makes for incredibly interesting conversations, too!

When stuff like this freaks me out, I don't like to just get offended and draw conlusions, I like to pick it apart and figure out what different people think, see the angles and learn something, and often that makes me feel a great deal better. So sincerely to you guys, thank you for that.

Gord's Bro, your comment reminded me of something that happened yesterday. I was sitting at school, eating ice-cream in the lounge, when Ron Jeremy comes strolling by, pausing at the elevator a few feet away(I'd love to say "I bumped into Ron Jeremy" because it would sound more exciting, but wouldn't quite be accurate). My friend's jaw dropped, his eyes widened, and so I pat him on the back encouragingly and said "Go on, shake the man's hand, you know you want to" which he did.

So we got to talking afterward, what the hell was Ron Jeremy doing at our school? Giving a Q & A apparently. But, I said, wouldn't it be infinitely more amusing if it had been a debate between Ron Jeremy and Andrea Dworkin? If you don't know who Dworkin is, she's a well-known feminist/philosopher/and-maybe-social-scientist-to-some-extent who tensd towards the extreme radical, to put it mildly. She has argues extensively that any form of intercourse between a man and a woman is rape, a violation no matter where you stick it because the woman (who is politically disadvantaged to the man) personal space is being encroached upon and penetrated.

Now, I know that if you read a lot of her stuff, she's not completely "wrong", and she has a lot of interesting arguments (though I haven't read enough to be any kind of authoritative expert on her, be warned). I see what she's saying in a really abstract kinda way, but for practical reality it's obviously a pretty useless philosophy to try and live. I call this kind of feminism "Doom Feminism" because it makes everything seem so permanently horrible.

And me? I'm more like "Can't you just choose a different paradigm? If enough people don't want to be the victim, can't we just start to will things to be different?" I know it's not like some magical, instant cure of society's problems, but if people start to think and believe differently, they will act differently. Reality will change. You can have a society (and maybe I'm jsut being naive here) where forcing someone into a sexual act would seem as rediculous as forcing someone to dance, something virtually non-existent in regular daily reality because the idea is foreign. And like you were saying, about the power dynamics of sex between men and women, a common response to the view of female submission/male dominating is "Why don't we see it as the female actively consuming the male?" Western conceptions of how intercourse works, with the male as the actor and the female as the passive receptacle, is a construct of medical language pieced together by male practitioners over the past, oh, few hundred to a few thousand years (whole other debate there), and so of course the language of sexual intercourse and anatomy is going to be with the male body as the standard model, with the female merely being a "variation" on the standard, and sexual acts coming from a male perspective. They didn't do it to be jerks, that's just the way it was. Male physicians seeing it from their world, without female input (though perhaps ingoring female input was a little jerky, but they thought we were mentally feeble and occasionally given to be possessed by the devil, so I'll give 'em a break ;) ) So that's probably why we have the popular language of "penetrate, thrust, enter, violate / submit, surrender, resign, permit" rather than female active participants who "consume, embark, absorb, devour, .....help me out here, even I'm not used to thinking about alternative discourses for sex.....uh, engage, assimilate, tap, extract, milk, sap (ooh, this is getting sexy, I'll stop there).

So don't let Dworkin make you feel bad about having sex! :)

Again, thank you guys for talking with me about this, I appreciate it so much, and totally see you're point of view.

*a kiss for each of you on the cheek*

-F
 

EnergizerBunny

rhythmic member
Nic Frenchy said:
Cliff Notes...Please?
For each of us, things are the way we perceive them to be.

We might look at the same bottle o' beer and it may be half full or half empty; we may love what it contains or hate what it contains. It may mean getting fat or getting a buzz; but hopefully we are not members of the temperance movement or we would have an altogether different perspective.


Oh you mean what Pool said? We never know that the fuck he is talking about! :p hahaha

No, seriously, Pool's a real smart dude.


Gord's Bro said:
As a male I've often wondered about the inequity between the sexes.

The act of making love itself tends to put the male in a position of power, since the woman is "surrendering" her body to him.
Fay said:
And like you were saying, about the power dynamics of sex between men and women, a common response to the view of female submission/male dominating is "Why don't we see it as the female actively consuming the male?"
Again this is all a matter of perspective, both our's individually and our society's collectively, blended together.

We might look at a pussy enshroud a cock and see ...

life ...

androgynous oneness ...

a little death ...

Fay said:
If enough people don't want to be the victim, can't we just start to will things to be different?" I know it's not like some magical, instant cure of society's problems, but if people start to think and believe differently, they will act differently. Reality will change.
This does happen, albeit very slowly.
 

seven

Banned
Apr 16, 2003
420
0
0
hiding behind my computer screen.
In the video, rape represents a violation of rights and freedoms and symbolizes a power struggle of sorts. I think the statement being made is that while on the surface it may seem that women are the victims of 'rape' in a male dominated society, the converse is actually true for anyone that cares to look a little deeper into the cause and effect, and that the males are the ones being ‘raped’ on a daily basis by females in a female dominated society (the irony and the excuse). In a sense, the video is condoning rape as a way for men to regain some control that women take from us very early on, because of the way society is structured and geared. It attempts to cast blame on women through rationalizations and justifications with the excuse that rape is acceptable because all women ask for it with all the crap they put men through.

In the initial scene the video shows a man acting out on his desires of a little 'harmless' fun (peering up her skirt), being constantly denied of that little pleasure from the woman, and then being dealt with harshly for just being a man (getting pepper sprayed in the eyes.) The man has finally had enough with being emasculated by women and society in general, and rapes the woman. The two men then share the 'bonding' experience, sort of like one of life's little escapes/pleasures from the drudgery that women constantly heap upon 'us' men.

The rest of the video is the rationalization. We see the reasons and the cycles. A bastard boy is born by cesarean – cut away at birth – and it is a struggle from the get go (you see him crawling away on his own). We have the classroom and the army (representing society) slowly taking away the man’s freedoms (the bird represents freedom and when the drill sergeant pisses on his head for smoking the bird falls dead to the ground b/c the man is finally forced to conform.) From there he picks up a chick at a bar, and he is forced to hand over his remaining freedom to her in this increasingly female dominated society (he is giving her ORAL sex in the LADIES’ washroom.) He then has to marry her and Jesus falls on his head (another aspect of how religion works within society to take away a man’s freedoms) and she drags him off to get a job to work for HER. The man is forced to do grunt work everyday while the woman sits at home and doesn’t even show him enough consideration to give him sex at the end of the day after a hard day’s work. In the end, for all his efforts she cheats on him, which shows cause and effect, and we return to the beginning rape scene and the start of a new cycle. The video is kinda like a battle cry for men to take, back, some of their lost power and to put women in their place.
 

WhaWhaWha

Banned
Aug 17, 2001
5,989
1
0
Between a rock and a hard place
Did anyone watch Doorsteps -- another vid on the same site?
 

Ophelia Black

Hey! Nice tits!
Sep 4, 2003
218
0
0
Vancouver
www.opheliablack.com
My perspective on rape is hard to explain. I think what bothers me the most about it is how it has been institutionalized as the very worse thing that can happen to a woman.

Just to get this out of the way, yes, it has happened to me - with a stranger who showed me a knife. A 'classic' rape, so to speak, before people got their heads out of their asses and clued into date and aquaintance rape.

What bothers me is this - rape is about being forcibly shown you have no power, and do not matter. I have male friends who have been alone when attacked and shit-kicked by a group of other guys. It fucking sucks, but they are allowed to get over it because society says that that situation - being forcibly shown you have no power and do not matter - for men is not intrinsically life-altering.

How come women aren't allowed to react the same way? Is it a life-altering situation in and of itself, or is it something society lays on us as the perpetually damaged virgin bride?

I have a sneaking suspicion it's a subtle societal sucker-punch.

For me, it's something on a list of crappy things that have happened in my life; I've been in a serious accident, my best friend killed himself, I got raped, I had a serious stalker threatening to kidnap and kill me, etc. etc.

I have no obligation to society to put the rape in a strange and separate martyred category reserved for the most part for women.

For me, to do that would feel an awful lot like being shown I have no power and do not matter - that my particular reaction to being raped is less important than society hanging onto the idea that a raped woman is marked forever.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts