Good article today on voter suppression tactics by the Republican party.Since Trump has won the election, we'll give you guys this tiny victory.
But if you look at where Muslim refugees come from, countries that are embroiled in nasty civil war are high on the list of refugee producing countries.I find the “Muslim ban” terminology a low information marker.
I think if we drew a Venn diagram of most populist Muslim countries, failed states and states with active terrorist organizations the logic of this “ban” would make more sense and align with the second two dimensions.
9/10 of the largest Muslim countries are not impacted by the “ban”, the only one that is is the largest state sponsor of terror. Hard to call it a “Muslim Ban” and not be low information.
That Venn diagram should also note which countries the US is presently 'intevening', 'bombing', 'bringing democracy', 'saving from themselves', 'saving from the savages', 'securing the oil' or whatever other reason they're using for bombing right now.I find the “Muslim ban” terminology a low information marker.
I think if we drew a Venn diagram of most populist Muslim countries, failed states and states with active terrorist organizations the logic of this “ban” would make more sense and align with the second two dimensions.
9/10 of the largest Muslim countries are not impacted by the “ban”, the only one that is is the largest state sponsor of terror. Hard to call it a “Muslim Ban” and not be low information.
Chicken/eggThat Venn diagram should also note which countries the US is presently 'intevening', 'bombing', 'bringing democracy', 'saving from themselves', 'saving from the savages', 'securing the oil' or whatever other reason they're using for bombing right now.
You could probably start from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration.Chicken/egg
Wisconsin is only good for 10 electoral votes anyways, so he still would have won the election by a large margin.Good article today on voter suppression tactics by the Republican party.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/10/voter-suppression-may-have-won-wisconsin-for-trump.html
Russians, voter suppression, gerrymandering.
Yup, a good clean win.
Wisconsin is one state, it happened elsewhere. This helps explain how Trump was less popular then unpopular Clinton and still won.Wisconsin is only good for 10 electoral votes anyways, so he still would have won the election by a large margin.
And I hope you have the brain to see that Russia investigation is going absolutely nowhere.
Has Trump been charged or impeached yet over Russia??Wisconsin is one state, it happened elsewhere. This helps explain how Trump was less popular then unpopular Clinton and still won.
And of course you think that the Russia investigation is going nowhere, I expect that's what you read in your selections of news sites.
Good luck with that
A republican has won 3 governor races in the last 6 years in WI and they elected a GOP Senator as well ( Russ lost again)Good article today on voter suppression tactics by the Republican party.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/10/voter-suppression-may-have-won-wisconsin-for-trump.html
Russians, voter suppression, gerrymandering.
Yup, a good clean win.
You mean 16 years, dont you??A republican has won 3 governor races in the last 6 years in WI
And by voter suppression, what they really mean, is they didn't have IDentification to vote. You know like how you need identification to buy alcohol or gamble.A republican has won 3 governor races in the last 6 years in WI and they elected a GOP Senator as well ( Russ lost again)
I find these areguments as weak and you would find the voter fraud arguments.
Actually you don't need ID to buy alcohol or gamble. What you need, is to be of legal age, and the proprietors will suffer serious consequences if they allow you to, but you are not. Whatever you use to prove that age to their satisfaction, if they ask you to, is between you and them.And by voter suppression, what they really mean, is they didn't have IDentification to vote. You know like how you need identification to buy alcohol or gamble.
In summary - THEY DIDN'T HAVE IDENTIFICATION TO VOTE, WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT IN WI .Actually .
Normally but Scott also had one or two special elections called he had to win.You mean 16 years, dont you??