Mountie Gets His Man

bobistheowl

New member
Jul 12, 2003
4,398
4
0
Toronto
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060521/rcmp_marriage_060521/20060521

Two gay RCMP officers plan to marry this summer
Updated Sun. May. 21 2006 11:35 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Two RCMP officers will finally get their man this summer, when Const. Jason Tree and Const. David Connors walk down the aisle and exchange vows.

It will be the first same-sex marriage in the Mounties' history.

"I'm a little nervous, as can be expected of any newlywed," Connors told CTV News.

The two have been a couple since they were students at the University of New Brunswick eight years ago, but only recently decided to wed.

"I thought it was the right time to ask David, and that's how it started," Tree said.

The couple added that the RCMP was supportive of their decision to marry.

"I've been open about my sexuality ever since I began this job," said Tree. "Coworkers, supervisors, management -- everyone is supportive."

However, there has been some friendly teasing, the couple said.

"We've heard the bad puns, like 'Brokeback Mounties' and all that. Actually, I think it's quite funny," said Connors.

An RCMP spokesman said the marriage shows the law enforcement agency is open to all of Canadian society.

Even in the small Nova Scotia fishing town where the officers live, residents couldn't care less about the marriage.

"There's nothing wrong with that. If they can't find a woman, they go for the men," one resident joked.

Another just said: "It doesn't matter."

Meanwhile, the two officers are surprised by the media attention, but hope to use the spotlight to prove the RCMP is open-minded when it comes to hiring recruits.

"I have several friends, and from seeing us in the RCMP they've gone to apply for the force. It's great to open up this career option to people," said Tree.

Connors and Tree plan to say their vows on June 30th, right before Canada Day.

Gay weddings were legalized across Canada last summer after court judgments repeatedly declared it unconstitutional to bar them.

Earlier this month, a controversial private member's bill in Alberta, denounced by critics as being anti-gay, died after opposition members used stalling tactics to prevent its passage.

Bill 208 would have allowed marriage commissioners in Alberta to refuse to perform same-sex marriages.

With a report by CTV's John Vennavally-Rao

I saw a promo for this story while watching Desperate Housewives, but I didn't watch the news piece.

Are they both Mounties, or is one a mounter?
 
bobistheowl said:
Are they both Mounties, or is one a mounter?

no, one is a mountie, the other is mounted

I think this will be a career limiting event for the mountie
 
Saw this story on the news last night. They rode in the same car ( no pun). How do they rationalze allowing that when a straight couple could not serve together.
 
would not want to sit in the backseat of that car!! who knows what they did back there
 
LancsLad said:
Saw this story on the news last night. They rode in the same car ( no pun). How do they rationalze allowing that when a straight couple could not serve together.

1. Because no-one else wants to ride with either of them.

2. Because they don't have to worry about their partner not backing them up in a firefight.

3. They make a cute couple
 
My point was that they are partners on the job and it was always my understanding ( maybe I'm wrong) that you didn't ride with a romantic interest. Impairs judgement and all.
 
explorer69 said:
Don't be so homophobic guys. It is 2006 and gay marriage is legal . What is the big deal?


might be legal but it is immoral and not natural
 
lol...

explorer69 said:
Don't be so homophobic guys. It is 2006 and gay marriage is legal . What is the big deal?
In some European Countries, sex with animals is not only legal; but is considered 'good' and 'healthy' and 'normal'. Personally, I find the idea of having anal sex with a goat or a pig to be unappealing. But don't get me wrong; I'm not 'Beastaphobic'. Sincerely, Jon .
 
acutus said:
In some European Countries, sex with animals is not only legal; but is considered 'good' and 'healthy' and 'normal'. Personally, I find the idea of having anal sex with a goat or a pig to be unappealing. But don't get me wrong; I'm not 'Beastaphobic'. Sincerely, Jon .


Actually, in the state of Washington, sex with animals is legal (I was there recently!)

There is apparently more than a dozen states in the USA where beastiality is not illegal
 
Papi Chulo said:
Actually, in the state of Washington, sex with animals is legal (I was there recently!)


Please tell us thats not the only reason you went there.:eek:
 
LancsLad said:
Please tell us thats not the only reason you went there.:eek:


If you fuck small animals, (IE: small dogs, chickens, cats) they can charge you with cruelty to animals... but sheep, cows, horses and medium to large dogs are okay.
 
Papi Chulo said:
If you fuck small animals, (IE: small dogs, chickens, cats) they can charge you with cruelty to animals... but sheep, cows, horses and medium to large dogs are okay.



That must have been some kind of study. What is it some kind of penis size to size of animal test. Some legislators ( OK all) just have too much time on their hands.
 
LancsLad said:
That must have been some kind of study. What is it some kind of penis size to size of animal test. Some legislators ( OK all) just have too much time on their hands.


If canadians can face penalties in canada for sex crimes abroad involving kids, could the same also apply to animals?? If you do go to WA, you just don't want to bring back any photos of the act, possession of photos / video of bestiality in canada is illegal


In July 2005, a 45 year old aerospace engineer, Kenneth Pinyan, died in Enumclaw, Washington from internal injury after being anally penetrated by a stallion (WA)
 
It is legal for some. We have hundreds of thousands of civil servants that " FUCK THE DOG" everyday AND get paid for it.
 
Papi Chulo said:
might be legal but it is immoral and not natural

I have a feeling you probably don't have any problem, though, with the immorality and unnaturalness of two women getting it on though. Talk about deeper issues.

Nice signature sicture by the way.
 
spatial_k said:
I have a feeling you probably don't have any problem, though, with the immorality and unnaturalness of two women getting it on though. Talk about deeper issues.

Nice signature sicture by the way.

I don't agree with 2 women or 2 men but the thought of 2 women is a little more appealing

Is my sig pic really 2 women??? Look closer :)
 
Papi Chulo said:
I don't agree with 2 women or 2 men but the thought of 2 women is a little more appealing

Is my sig pic really 2 women??? Look closer :)

Haha, I saw that, which is why I commented at all. Well, as long as you don't have a double standard for male and female homosexuality.
 
spatial_k said:
Haha, I saw that, which is why I commented at all. Well, as long as you don't have a double standard for male and female homosexuality.
Please consider, Mr. Spatial_k, that from a man's perspective, watching two women engaging in sexual activity presents no(perceived) 'threat' to that male viewer(no subconscious comparisons, or competition, etc.); hence the viewing attraction. Also two(or more)women engaging in sexual activity, is a harmless behaviour. In contrast, male Homosexual behaviour causes the deadly, incurable, contagious and completely preventable anal disease known as AIDS. The male Homosexual behaviour may be(at least from my perspective)only pathetic and ridiculous; however, it is the consequenses of that behaviour that represents the larger and legitimate Moral question. Sincerely, Jon .