Monet for TERB Editor!

[midLifeCrisis]

From Just got back from seeing Lynn_Ha

I seriously, seriously cannot believe all this hype on this one! Are all you pro camp guys HIGH? Or in major need of GLASSES! let it die -PLEASE!

Monet has again shown his judgement, maturity and tact in this insightful post. I, too, have been most annoyed by the clutter on this site, the reviews of women uninteresting to me and the faulty judgement shown by many reviewers.

Clearly, an editor for this board is needed. Somebody with the mature judgement to suppress reviews that are simply incorrect. Somebody who can look at pictures on a website and let us know, unequivocally, just what the correct reaction to these pictures should be. Somebody who can tell us forcefully what to think.

Gentlemen, I give you ... Monet!

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Correct or incorrect, YTMV. BUT 15 threads on how great one SP is tends to become tiresome. Be it someone "hot" like Bobbi, or "not so" like Lynn Ha.

Some thoughts from someone at arm's length in the matter:

1. If you disagree with a review, that's okay. Just don't expect to convince the reviewer that they are wrong. Reviews are opinions.

2. If you agree with the review, that's okay too. Just don't post mindless "me too" responses, and collectively gang up on those who disagree. Disagreements are opinions also.

3. Many favourable reviews of a SP who "isn't your cup of tea" does not a shill make. Especially if said reviews are from reputable posters. A shill is a favourable review of a bad SP, IMO. Most shills are found out sooner or later. If there have been favourable reviews of a certain SP for months and months, chances are there is some merit in the reviews.

4. I like tall blondes with large natural boobies. You may like short asians with small perky boobies. WE WILL NEVER AGREE ON OUR IDEA OF THE PERFECT SP! Get over it.

5. If there is a thread running 142 pages of glowing reviews of an SP you find unattractive ... don't click on it.

6. If someone disagrees with you on how attractive an SP is, that's their opinion. They are not attacking your masculinity.

7. I like pie.

That is all.

 

[midLifeCrisis]

7. I like pie.

mmmmm! pie

 

[Monet]

That's a good one midLifeCrisis.
Not 100% sure what you meant exactly but you added some much needed humor here! lol Without force of course!

 

[Remo]

Mid life crisis, that link is the funniest think I have seen in a while.

I do think we need a triumvirate of some kind to get rid of this clutter as well.

I think once an SP has recieved a certain amount of favourable or unfavourable reviews they should be put in a special section. The reviews should be scored by the Triumvirate of wise TERB elders and then the SP give a "current score". Once this is done, members are requested not to review if their review is consistent with the current score. If it is a tally mark is added to the persons name with a date. If the review is contrary to the current score, then is included.

This is just a rough idea, I haven't given much thought to the particulars but something of this nature is becoming needed.

The Lynn threads for example, did anyone besides me notice the high percentage of low posters who chimmed in there? Either it is because so many people were infuriated by the thread or a few people used every multiple nick they ever set up.

I think the day of change is coming. Im sure Fred Zed has noticed this too, as it is unlikely he wants his bandwidth and disk space taken up by clap-trap. Also, not to mention the frustration, accusations and other negative thinks it spawns on the board.

I am willing to help in coming up with some new user rules should a committee or something be conviened. Gee, sometimes I wonder about us all. This board gets taken quite seriously at times

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Remo: Can we call them the Illuminati?

 

[midLifeCrisis]

I now see that Monet has removed the remarks to which I took exception.

Credit where credit is due.

 

[Meesh]

Correct or incorrect, YTMV. BUT 15 threads on how great one SP is tends to become tiresome. Be it someone "hot" like Bobbi, or "not so" like Lynn Ha.

Some thoughts from someone at arm's length in the matter:

1. If you disagree with a review, that's okay. Just don't expect to convince the reviewer that they are wrong. Reviews are opinions.

2. If you agree with the review, that's okay too. Just don't post mindless "me too" responses, and collectively gang up on those who disagree. Disagreements are opinions also.

3. Many favourable reviews of a SP who "isn't your cup of tea" does not a shill make. Especially if said reviews are from reputable posters. A shill is a favourable review of a bad SP, IMO. Most shills are found out sooner or later. If there have been favourable reviews of a certain SP for months and months, chances are there is some merit in the reviews.

4. I like tall blondes with large natural boobies. You may like short asians with small perky boobies. WE WILL NEVER AGREE ON OUR IDEA OF THE PERFECT SP! Get over it.

5. If there is a thread running 142 pages of glowing reviews of an SP you find unattractive ... don't click on it.

6. If someone disagrees with you on how attractive an SP is, that's their opinion. They are not attacking your masculinity.

7. I like pie.

That is all.

On 1-6.....yep, if you don't think the threads are interesting or worthwhile...don't read 'em! Simple. Straightforward. And it doesn't clutter up threads with posts about cluttering up threads!

On 7....I like pineapple pie, pizza pie, pumpkin pie...and mince tarts! Just like Peter Percival Patterson's pet pig Porky!

 

[Goober Mcfly]

Meesh's Signature
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.........those who understand binary and those who don't.

ROTFLMFAO! [/geek]

 

[Monet]

I think once an SP has recieved a certain amount of favourable or unfavourable reviews they should be put in a special section. The reviews should be scored by the Triumvirate of wise TERB elders and then the SP give a "current score". Once this is done, members are requested not to review if their review is consistent with the current score. If it is a tally mark is added to the persons name with a date. If the review is contrary to the current score, then is included.

Excellent idea!