I've looked at this a lot and I'd say the blame on the accident happening is more on the cyclist than the driver. FWIW I am a cyclist with tens of thousands of km under my belt so I obviously don't have a bias against them.
The cyclist didn't cross at the appropriate place, you can see in the street views that the grass is worn out around the gate thing on the sidewalk and towards crossing the ramp so a lot of cyclists do it. I wouldn't say this is a bad thing necessarily. Where he crossed was right next to the sidewalk crossing and the angle the cyclist was cutting across would afford him better visibility and a better chance to react. On the flip side since the cyclist wasn't crossing at the proper crossing, the driver would have no idea that the cyclist was going to cut in front of him until he actually did. The cyclist wasn't going very fast and doesn't look like he was even pedaling when he crossed so it doesn't seem like he was trying to beat the car, and there's at least 30m from when the car was finished making the corner to where the impact happened, he had lots of time to react to the car.
The car had his signal light around the corner and didn't make any sudden lane changes. The car did have to tighten up it's turn a bit so maybe was carrying a little too much speed through the corner. However, at that point there was still ~50m between the car and the cyclist so lots of time for both to see each other and react so I can't explain why either didn't other than the driver thought the cyclist was going to continue down the sidewalk instead of turn right in front of him. I think the cyclist is at fault here. This is still no excuse for the hit an run!
Sort of off topic but I have never understood why they tell cyclist to dismount and walk their bikes across an intersection. The only thing I can think of is if the cyclist spontaneously falls over in front of a car, but then if you are that uncoordinated then you'll probably trip over your bike trying to push it to. Also trying to walk in cycling shoes and support a bike beside you is pretty awkward, I can't see any way this being safer.
The cyclist didn't cross at the appropriate place, you can see in the street views that the grass is worn out around the gate thing on the sidewalk and towards crossing the ramp so a lot of cyclists do it. I wouldn't say this is a bad thing necessarily. Where he crossed was right next to the sidewalk crossing and the angle the cyclist was cutting across would afford him better visibility and a better chance to react. On the flip side since the cyclist wasn't crossing at the proper crossing, the driver would have no idea that the cyclist was going to cut in front of him until he actually did. The cyclist wasn't going very fast and doesn't look like he was even pedaling when he crossed so it doesn't seem like he was trying to beat the car, and there's at least 30m from when the car was finished making the corner to where the impact happened, he had lots of time to react to the car.
The car had his signal light around the corner and didn't make any sudden lane changes. The car did have to tighten up it's turn a bit so maybe was carrying a little too much speed through the corner. However, at that point there was still ~50m between the car and the cyclist so lots of time for both to see each other and react so I can't explain why either didn't other than the driver thought the cyclist was going to continue down the sidewalk instead of turn right in front of him. I think the cyclist is at fault here. This is still no excuse for the hit an run!
Sort of off topic but I have never understood why they tell cyclist to dismount and walk their bikes across an intersection. The only thing I can think of is if the cyclist spontaneously falls over in front of a car, but then if you are that uncoordinated then you'll probably trip over your bike trying to push it to. Also trying to walk in cycling shoes and support a bike beside you is pretty awkward, I can't see any way this being safer.