I may not have expressed myself as artfully as possible. YOUR client list includes escort and others. The ESCORTS (who are your clients) have a client list of their own, which primarily includes men. Part of my argument (which you have already dismissed as a ploy) is that some of your customers' customers are men who may be (and some clearly are) turned off by your proposed sig pic. I was not arguing that you would suffer any economic damage to your client list. I did say that your actions might decrease (to an unknown degree) the efficacy of your customers' advertising on Terb. However, since I very much doubt we will reach agreement on this point, I have no plans to repeat myself.
As for your career, you are on Terb in part because you have escorts as clients (and, presumably, want to increase that client base). Regardless of how many women are flattered by your pictures and regardless of your talent, you are not always creating art or eroticism - or at least that is not the dominant purpose of some of the pictures you take of escorts. These are not pictures intended primarily for exhibition at art shows or for home use, the primary purpose of some of the pictures you take of escorts is for advertising your customers' bodies to their potential clients. While I expect that you do take pictures for a variety of reasons - some artistic, some commercial, some both - some of your pictures are intended to advertise women's bodies for rent to men. That is objectification. You make some of your money objectifying women's bodies.
I do not intend the above as criticism. That would be hypocritical. I do, however, think you overlook your role in the commercialization of sex when you take the position that your function is purely artistic.