Massmurderer talks

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
danmand said:
Click on video underneath the picture.

http://www.eb.dk/
Can I still beat you up and click regardless??????
Cho_Seung-Hui__248198g.jpg
 
Another lunatic with a gun.

This guy was a serious nut job. This guy set fire to a room, was charged with stalking women and he wrote some seriously disturbing papers for his English class. Everyone who knew this guy, knew he was a wacko. He was determined by a court of law to be danger to himself and others. He was sentenced to psychiatric treatment.

How the hell was he able to purchase a gun? Why was he living in a dorm with other people?

Anyone with a Psychiatric history should never be able to buy a gun. To hell with medical privacy. End of story
 
Theoretically, if you were caught getting jerked of in a massage parlour, you could get sentenced to some counselling and end up with a psychiatric history. Better just to ban guns altogether.

There will also be some nut job who wants kill people. You can either try to catch them before they do it, or just make it unfeasible for them to do it.
 
mmouse said:
Theoretically, if you were caught getting jerked of in a massage parlour, you could get sentenced to some counselling and end up with a psychiatric history. Better just to ban guns altogether.

There will also be some nut job who wants kill people. You can either try to catch them before they do it, or just make it unfeasible for them to do it.

Banning guns doesn't mean anything to a bad guy. They will get one, one way or another.
 
Statistically these kind of things happen much more often in the US than any other country. Is it because:
a) US has more crazy people
b) It's easy to buy guns in the US

Aside from availability, crazy people in the US grow up hearing about other mass murders involving guns, so they fantasize about doing that.
However in Iraq, the nutjobs sees suicide attacks on the news, so they go out and blow themselves up instead.
 
BuffNaked said:
Banning guns doesn't mean anything to a bad guy. They will get one, one way or another.

Guns don't kill people, people do. If he could not get guns, he would have done it with a dull bread knife.

I assume they wrestled the guns out of his cold, dead hands.
 
danmand said:
Guns don't kill people, people do. If he could not get guns, he would have done it with a dull bread knife.


True. But I'm guessing the body count would have been one or two instead of 32. No reason to make it easy.
 
BuffNaked said:
Banning guns doesn't mean anything to a bad guy. They will get one, one way or another.
not if there are no guns. what is he going to do - make one?
 
This dude was gonna do damage - gun or no gun. He also had plans to make a bomb. If he couldn't get a gun, he would have bombed a building. A bomb can be worse. Remember Oklahoma City? 168 dead.
 
You can't ban guns and you can't ban lunatics.

You can take every reasonable precaution to keep the guns and the lunatics away from each other.

There's no way that such an obvious lunatic should be allowed to buy a legal handgun.