Care to elaborate blackram? I mean in general, not necessarily specifically for Maria.
I honestly don't know how to interpret your assertion or what to expect from Maria as a result of it. I tend to think there is considerable variance in the services offered among MAs. Many are now offering erotic massage services with lots of full-body contact but no intimacy. Many others are providing more "traditional" rub-and-tug experiences, which may but often do not include additional intimate favors. One well known MA has gained some notoriety on this board recently for lifting some of her long-standing restrictions and providing a more "relaxed" service. Is she now part of your norm or an exception to it? Frankly, I think the business is all over the map.
I genuinely am curious to know what this community considers to be the norm. I understand that ymmv will always come into play, but I also tend to think "we" generally do have minimum expectations of a "baseline" service for a non-RMT massage (i.e. stuff you should expect on the first visit, regardless of whether you ask for it or not). For example, I have long considered a HJ and top nudity with touching/kissing of the breasts to be table stakes. Without experiencing at least that, I will leave a dissatisfied customer. However, I have noticed more and more that full nudity (without intimate touching) is now being provided without me even asking for it. Perhaps enough of you have asked so it has crept into the baseline definition (or maybe it's always been there and I was just too much of a gentleman to expect it on the first visit :angel: ). Other popular service options like the body slide and nude reverse I would consider belonging to a "next tier" service group (some will provide it and some won't). In the next group higher I would include the BJ. Still reasonable to expect, but within an even smaller group of MAs. Beyond that, for more intimate services like DATY, FS, and kissing, I think you are getting into exclusive services offered by a small minority of MAs (although I think this minority involves more than 0.1% of the MA population). Comments anyone?