In about a year, actually July 6th 2005; Karla Homolka will be released from prison. Homolka served 12 years for her role in, probably the most notorious serial murder trial in recent memory. Homolka was convicted of 2 counts of manslaughter.
The question is - do you think she will require mandatory supervision after her release or seeing that she did her full stint, she's entitled to live her life free of any restrictions?
The Crown in the trial made an interesting comment - he noted that the difference in Bernardo and Homolka is the difference between evil and pure evil. Is there a difference? Should there be?
The question is - do you think she will require mandatory supervision after her release or seeing that she did her full stint, she's entitled to live her life free of any restrictions?
The Crown in the trial made an interesting comment - he noted that the difference in Bernardo and Homolka is the difference between evil and pure evil. Is there a difference? Should there be?