didnt kniw a dude with 15000 posts couldnt navagate through a thread.No, just a troll.
shoot any turd with a knife or a gun being brandished at a cop. easier to read for you?
argue something useful next time.
didnt kniw a dude with 15000 posts couldnt navagate through a thread.No, just a troll.
i think your cinfusing me with someone who gives a shit abiut spellng. its ok. no orob. preety surr you got the jist. if not... sadType a little slower BRO, it will be easier to read.
are you calling blackrock pretty?i think your cinfusing me with someone who gives a shit abiut spellng. its ok. no orob. preety surr you got the jist. if not... sad
As long as he doesn't call me Shirleyare you calling blackrock pretty?
are you calling blackrock pretty?
oh you have a gay shoe fetish thing going on. well good for you. you express yourself girlfrienddoes the shoe fit?
wjats to dipute?Anyways, find that magnifying glass and those tweezers yet? Since your so interested in having a man pleasure you I thought I would start a fund so you can finally see that male SP you seem to want do much. Other members, please PM me if you would like to donate. Don't forget the magnifying glass and the tweezers, otherwise the male SP might think you're a woman (I guess the jury's still out on that one).
Dispute what I wrote about this topic or get back under that bridge, troll.
pretty clever fr a dude who has written over. 15000 of these.oh you have a gay shoe fetish thing going on. well good for you. you express yourself girlfriend
It appeared that the threat was neutralized after the first three shots.
hey thanks. its fans like you who keep me going.pretty clever fr a dude who has written over. 15000 of these.
i cant troll better thsn you have in this thread. you made it into a joke. good jobGood for you. You finally made some "friends". Too bad that they're on the Internet and likely don't care about you as much as you care for them. Anyways, good luck and troll away.
i thought it was guys like cycleguy and esco? wheres goober?hey thanks. its fans like you who keep me going.
they all made the mistake of riding streetcars in toronto. now they are no more.i thought it was guys like cycleguy and esco? wheres goober?
He did drop, the store video shows that he was down with his feet pointing towards the door.
Even if he still moving (writhing in pain probably) he could not possibly be a threat at that point. He may well have been waving the knife and maybe even yelling threats but he was not a threat.
While it is true that standing he could charge at an officer that is not possible lying down. He would first have to get back on his feet and from the video it really doesn't seem like he did.
What will do in the officer is the six second pause and deliberate decision to resume firing after changing his aim and shouting.
I don't really expect criminal charges but he will maybe be disciplined administratively under the police act.
How certain are you about the timing of the shots? My understanding was (simplistically) that a reporter had used software to try to match auditory recordings with different visual recordings and then made conclusions about the timing of the shots. To get anywhere near administrative discipline, won't SIU have to be convinced that the officer had plenty of time before firing the second set of rounds to determine that Yatim was thoroughly incapacitated by his first three rounds?
Writhing in pain is, of course, an assumption on your part. I have not seen the store video, but I don't believe it has audio. Is there no chance that Yatim was in shock (rather than in immediate pain) and was yelling threats and appeared to be trying to get back up? Is there any audio of the police demanding "stay down" or "drop the knife" or something similar?
He still has the knife. He gets shot. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Acceptable.There's no justification for 6 more shots. Wait it out. The taser was coming. Totally unacceptable.
Fawcett notes that few people realize how quickly a life-or-death decision must be made.
"Time and distance is something that few people appreciate," said Fawcett. "If you're going 10 miles an hour, that's 15 feet per second. Ten miles an hour is a jog. So if somebody's 15 feet away with a knife in their hand, you have less than a second to deal with it. But most people look at the headline and go, 'Oh, the person was 20 feet away. Ohmigod, why didn't the officers do something else?'"
Not after he was hit three times and falls on the floor. He cannot harm the cop lying on the floor after he's been shot 3 times. Do you understand this point you vigilante? Would you be a threat to me if I shot you three times in your torso? Can you do much to me at that point?He still has the knife. He gets shot. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Acceptable.
Now I'm curious. Are the bases for your conclusion that police offcers were "arbitrarily deciding to execute a suspect when their life is not at risk" only that six more shots were fired and that a taser was available? If so, can you not think of any other plausible reasons why 6 additional shots were fired when a taser was "present", other than that the shooter is a psychopath who just wanted an excuse to kill someone "arbitrarily"?
Is it not possible that neither of the two police officers who were closest to Yatim was armed with a taser? Not every police officer has one. If they both had guns drawn and aimed and Yatim made any motion as though he were about to charge, would you really expect both police officers to hold fire until a taser could be brought to them?
Is it not possible that the officer who pulled the trigger was alarmed by threats from an apparently crazy person armed with a knife and then shot again because Yatim was still threatening and thrashing around after he fell to the floor? Is there absolutely no way that the police officer could have been acting in good faith? Are you that certain?