Why must civilians pay for Aznar and ETA?
Well, "their" land was taken by force if you're referring to the Muslim and protected Jewish minority population, and not to el kaida or whatever it's called. The local population at the time was foribly converted to Christianity as usual, of course the Jews were treated more harshly, and of course the Inquisition also targeted "heretics". Interesting that I didn't see a detailed piece on ETA last night despite that being the group most likely to have done the deed, the media seemed compelled to pin this on someone else. Anyway, Bin Laid denied responsibility for the NY attacks, although he was only too happy before that to claim anything that was remotely linked to him. It seems that the chain of conspirators may have left the big boss out of the loop at the time. So I don't care if ETA denies it, they're still the prime suspects. A very cowardly thing to do targeting innocent working stiffs this way. Why must they do this? Bastards.
Well, "their" land was taken by force if you're referring to the Muslim and protected Jewish minority population, and not to el kaida or whatever it's called. The local population at the time was foribly converted to Christianity as usual, of course the Jews were treated more harshly, and of course the Inquisition also targeted "heretics". Interesting that I didn't see a detailed piece on ETA last night despite that being the group most likely to have done the deed, the media seemed compelled to pin this on someone else. Anyway, Bin Laid denied responsibility for the NY attacks, although he was only too happy before that to claim anything that was remotely linked to him. It seems that the chain of conspirators may have left the big boss out of the loop at the time. So I don't care if ETA denies it, they're still the prime suspects. A very cowardly thing to do targeting innocent working stiffs this way. Why must they do this? Bastards.
