Madoff net worth revealed

jwmorrice

Gentleman by Profession
Jun 30, 2003
7,133
2
0
In the laboratory.
Madoff to appeal bail, net worth revealed
By Grant McCool and Edith Honan Grant Mccool And Edith Honan 2 hrs 1 min ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) –
Lawyers for jailed swindler Bernard Madoff argued for his release pending sentencing and a list of assets put he and his wife's net worth between $823 million and $826 million, according to court papers filed on Friday.

Madoff, 70, was jailed on Thursday after pleading guilty to running the biggest investment fraud in Wall Street history that drew in as much as $65 billion over 20 years.

His sentencing on 11 criminal charges is scheduled for June 16, when he could be imprisoned for the rest of his life.

A three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York will hear oral arguments on March 19 on two motions by Madoff's lawyers.

Court papers filed on Friday revealed the list of assets that Madoff provided on December 31 to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which brought civil charges against the former Nasdaq stock market chairman.

The net value of Madoff's ownership in his business, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was $700 million, according to the list. It put the net worth of Bernard Madoff and Ruth Madoff at between $823 million and $826 million.

Madoff's lawyer declined comment on the asset list, as did Peter Chavkin, a lawyer for Ruth Madoff.

Most of the assets listed were in Ruth Madoff's name. Properties in Manhattan, Palm Beach, Florida, Antibes and France amounting to $19 million are in her name. The couple jointly owned a $3 million property on New York's Long Island.

In a court filing in early March, their lawyers said $69 million in property and accounts belonged to her and was unrelated to the fraud, including the $7 million apartment where he was held under house arrest until Thursday.

ASSET FREEZE

Madoff's business and personal assets were frozen following his December 11 arrest. A court-appointed trustee winding down the firm said last month he recovered about $946.4 million for former customers.

The asset list confirmed some of the properties and valuables such as jewelry and cars owned by the Madoffs, who have been married for nearly 50 years. The list showed legal fees of $100,000.

A yacht called "Bull" in France valued at $7 million is in Ruth Madoff's name. A Rybovich fishing boat, also called "Bull" in Palm Beach, Florida, valued at $2.2 million belonged to Bernard Madoff.

Furniture, goods and fine art in his four residences, plus his office, total $9,920,522. A Steinway piano in their $7 million New York apartment is valued at $39,000 and, also in her name, is $65,000 in silverware, according to the list.

In summary, the list shows $22 million in real estate, $17 million in cash at Wachovia bank in Ruth Madoff's name, and almost $10 million in furniture, goods and fine art spread across residences and the office.

There is also $45 million in municipal bonds listed as belonging to Ruth Madoff at Cohmad Securities, a brokerage partly owned by Bernard Madoff, and a $12 million interest in a company charter aircraft.

Madoff's new surroundings in a small cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan across the street from the federal courthouse where he pleaded guilty, is a far cry from the opulent lifestyle reflected in the asset list.

In the appeal, one motion aims to suspend an order made at Thursday's plea proceeding by U.S. District Judge Denny Chin to revoke Madoff's $10 million bail.

The panel will also hear a motion from the lawyers to reinstate his bail conditions.

"The District Court erroneously failed to release Mr. Madoff because the evidence clearly shows that Mr. Madoff is not a flight risk and does not pose a threat to the community," a court document said.

It said Madoff does not have the means to flee.

The lawyers argued Madoff needs to be released so he could contribute to resolving a dispute over restitution and/or forfeiture.

"Mr Madoff's contribution to this effort will be severely hampered, if not altogether eliminated, if he is remanded," the lawyers said in the filing with the appeals court. They said Madoff "was the only person responsible for the crimes and, as a result, is the only person with the knowledge needed to decipher the relevant records."
 
Legal question:

If he put a large part of his stolen money over the years into property and accounts in his wife's name, can those properties and accounts still be frozen and divided up as fruits of his crime, or are they 'safe' from the courts because they are in her name?
 
Last edited:
alexmst said:
Legal question:

If he put a large part of his stolen money over the years into property and acconts in his wife's name, can those properties and accounts still be frozen and divided up as fruits of his crime, or are they 'safe' from the courts because they are in her name?

Maybe not a "legal" answer, but a common sense answer:
Treat him the same as the cops treats mobsters/bikers/gangsta's: treat EVERYTHING as proceeds-of-crime & leave it up to him to prove otherwise!

My 2 cents worth....
 
i think it is pretty simple. what was her source of income?
 
alexmst said:
Legal question:

If he put a large part of his stolen money over the years into property and acconts in his wife's name, can those properties and accounts still be frozen and divided up as fruits of his crime, or are they 'safe' from the courts because they are in her name?

hmmm.... so if I stole a million bucks from the bank and put that in my wife's account immediately... does that mean they can't freeze it
 
This article goes into details about Ruth and her claim that 70 million is hers and should not be taken by the government:

Feds may seize assets of Madoff's wife
By Jim Fitzgerald
Associated Press
Updated: 03/12/2009 11:26:21 PM

NEW YORK -- If Ruth Madoff hopes to hold onto her fancy apartment, her millions in cash and her jetsetting lifestyle while her husband is in prison, experts have some advice for her: Get ready for an inquisition.

Attorneys and investment specialists say Madoff will have a difficult time proving her assertion that up to $69 million of the couple's wealth was unrelated to her husband's Ponzi scheme.

"It's going to be very hard for her to show that anything is untainted," said Alton Abramowitz, national vice president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

Some angry investors suspect their money ended up in Ruth Madoff's hands.

The couple met at their Queens high school and married in 1959, the year after she graduated. Some investors have said their long marriage lent an air of stability to Madoff and his fund.

But even if she is never charged with a crime, Ruth Madoff's wealth will be closely reviewed by federal prosecutors and civil lawyers.

Investigators will want to see personal bank statements, credit card receipts, tax returns and canceled checks, as well as her business records.

"The process gives us the right to look at all of it to try to prove that Mrs. Madoff did not earn this money on her own," said Jeffrey Sonn, a securities specialist in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., representing dozens of Madoff claimants. "It's intrusive, sure, but that's the procedure."

What those credit-card receipts will show is a life apparently unbound by care, with homes in Palm Beach, Fla., the south of France and the tip of Long Island, besides the $7 million penthouse in midtown Manhattan. There was also travel by private jet and yacht.

At Thursday's court hearing, loud laughter erupted among some of the more than 100 spectators when Bernard Madoff's defense lawyer described the conditions of his client's house arrest and how Madoff had, "at his wife's own expense," paid for private security at their Manhattan home.

There was more snickering when the attorney mentioned that, at the initial bail hearing, he had accounted for Madoff's vast assets including his wife's "small residence in France."

Over the years, Bernard Madoff's financial acumen became legendary, and friends and acquaintances begged him to take their money. The couple also raised two boys -- Mark, now 44, and Andrew, 42 -- who are both now talking to investigators.

Ruth Madoff, now 67, became co-trustee of the family foundation, earned a master's degree in nutrition and helped compile a cookbook, "The Great Chefs of America Cook Kosher," still available on Amazon.com.

Now the couple's life of privilege is endangered by the criminal and civil cases.

First, the federal judge overseeing Bernard Madoff's case is likely to rule that he must forfeit some large sum, to be determined by an ongoing investigation that's looking at all family members.

Madoff has already given up the rights to his investment business, his company's prized artwork and some entertainment tickets, and about a dozen checks have already gone out to victims of the Ponzi scheme.

But those checks from the Securities Investor Protection Corp. are limited to $500,000, and that's not likely to stanch the filing of civil lawsuits, including class actions, which will then delve into the Madoff assets.

Ruth Madoff's attorney, Peter Chavkin, declined to comment Thursday. But his client will probably try to prove that her assets came from her own earnings or her own money, and that there was no mixing with funds tainted by her husband's crime.

She may already be preparing that defense, with the help of her husband.

In a lengthy statement Thursday, he told the judge that some parts of his business were legitimate and successful -- a possible move to show that some of the family's assets are separate from the Ponzi scheme.

"He's trying to save the rest of his family," said investor Judith Welling. "We need to find out who else was involved, and we need, obviously, to freeze the assets of all those people involved to help the victims."

Madoff and his lawyers are also claiming that the Manhattan apartment and an additional $62 million in bonds and cash can be kept from investors because they are in Ruth Madoff's name and unrelated to the fraud.

"We are all skeptical of that claim because how did she earn $70 million?" Sonn asked. "She's going to have to show a trail to show it came from somewhere other than Madoff securities."

Andrew DeNatale, a specialist in the law governing creditor-debtor rights, said, "Just because something's in her name doesn't automatically protect her. The analysis would be, 'When was it put in her name? How did it get in her name?' Any transfers into her own name at the present time or recently would be investigated as fraudulent."

Criminal and civil auditors are also interested in the $15.5 million Ruth Madoff withdrew from an account in Massachusetts last year, including $10 million on the day before her husband surrendered.

Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin said last month that the withdrawals raise questions about whether there was a broader conspiracy behind Bernard Madoff's actions. Madoff has claimed he acted alone.

Madoff made no deal with prosecutors, so he is not obligated to disclose what, if anything, Ruth Madoff knew about the fraud.

Criminal defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt said Ruth Madoff could argue that even if some asset is tainted, she should be able to keep it if she knew nothing of the wrongdoing.

That's a tough sell with investors.

"Does anybody think she didn't know?" Sonn asked. "She worked with him, she lived with him, they traveled together, they were inseparable for 50 years."

Lawyers said they have occasionally seen couples consider divorcing to protect one spouse's assets when the other is convicted of fraud.

"But courts are alert to phonied-up divorces," said family law specialist Henry Bergen. "Filing for divorce now would not help the Madoffs. Even the lawyers would get in trouble."

Most experts believe the investigation into the Madoff assets will end with some kind of settlement, perhaps leaving Ruth Madoff with enough money to be secure but without extravagances like the penthouse. Florida's homestead law may protect the mansion there, as it protected O.J. Simpson's.

"The only way she is left in poverty is if she fights this to the finish and loses," said attorney Robert Zobrish. "Otherwise some resolution will be worked out which allows her to keep something so she can live some sort of life."
 
Doen't matter anymore he is a dead man. The russians, the cartel and even the jews have hired hit men for him. These people don't take losing very good
 
I am surprised (maybe not so) that so many people were gullable enough to fall for his scam. Especially those who lost everything!! One word, ENRON!!! Was it that long ago? How about, if sounds to good to be true...and, an oldie but goodie, don't put all you eggs in one basket.
 
JEFF247 said:
I am surprised (maybe not so) that so many people were gullable enough to fall for his scam.
LOL!!!
Probably some of that 'honor among thieves' thingy. They trusted him because they were sort of shifty types themselves and figured he was slick enough to pull it off. In the end it all came crashing down.
 
Most of the people he screwed were his own kind.

He abuse the trust of fellow Jews. These were most of his victims.