An expert already said, poor response can be contributed to lack of training and preparedness because of budget cuts...are you a fire expert too?
Los Angeles Is Another DEI Catastrophe
- Thread starter Bucktee
- Start date
It has been 21 days since it started and the Palisades fire is 95% contained, the Eaton fire 99% contained and the Hughes fire 98% contained.
This with Santa Ana 100mph winds.
That is pretty solid imo.
Many wildfires take months to contain.
Clearly you aren't.
If you were you would point out to what the 2% cut actually did that allowed the fires to run out of control and what could have been done to stop them.
But you can't, can you?
I'm not claiming to be an expert...I read what an expert stated.:
"7 million budget cut severely affected the Department's capacity to prepare for, train for and respond to large scale emergencies"
Yet somehow you know better than an expert and think it's no big deal... tell that to LA residents with no houses...
You mean the "DEI lesbian fire chief"?
So clearly she is an expert and DEI has nothing to do with the wild fire.
And what specifically could have been done better if they had spent that 7 million?I'm not claiming to be an expert...I read what an expert stated.:
"7 million budget cut severely affected the Department's capacity to prepare for, train for and respond to large scale emergencies"
Yet somehow you know better than an expert and think it's no big deal... tell that to LA residents with no houses...
What would have stopped those fires?
the statement was already indicated by the EXPERT.
7 million was cut that would've been for training and preparedness and response to catastrophic emergencies...what don't you get from what the expert said? YOu just can't admit the mistake can you? I'm waiting for you to challenge the statement of an expert and just say the expert is not qualified...because you know better than an expert...
You say you read the expert report but can't say what $7 million could have bought that would have stopped those fires.
Your entire argument is based on this imaginary claim that $7 million could have stopped it.
Says the guy who makes troll comments and then expects to be taken seriously.
If you don't wanna believe what the expert said. I can not help you at all...
"the cuts resulted in eliminating 58 positions, adjusting sworn salary accounts and removing one time expenses. Some have pointed to the one-time expenses such as the purchase of NEW BREATHING equipment for firefighters,
Some might see you as a hopeless case....not me...i'm a nice dude.
So you think new breathing equipment would have stopped the California forest fires?
That's the best you've got?
Your entire argument just fell over.
Why is Jill in front of the desk and not behind it?...I will say one thing for Joe, he's managed to land the highest job in the country with dementia...Maybe he 's a future spokesman for the Alzheimer Society...Can he lawn bowl?
