That is a pretty good effort at avoiding the discussion.I see you have reduced yourself to trolling.
That's funny!
I guess my work here is finished.
That is a pretty good effort at avoiding the discussion.I see you have reduced yourself to trolling.
That's funny!
I guess my work here is finished.
MAGA believe the weirdest shit, regardless of how stupid it is and regardless of how easy it is to check.Oh there were fires before and they knew there will be risks of fires again...that's DEI to you. no idea how to prepare for the tragedy...defunding the FD was a good idea?
the DEI Fire Safety and prevention.
- Let take a few more millions from the program. How bad could it be.
-Blame the winds when it does happen.
![]()
![]()
You really get upset when its pointed out the facts don't support your claims and even more so when the articles you post don't back up what you say.Nice try buddy..... nice of you to slaughter a nice article.
Crowley said it had affected the operations...
YOu took Mayor Bass statement and put it under crowley...hahaha. sneaky.
How good was their response? LolThis is about your claims.
You claimed that the 2% budget cut affected fire prevention.
Crowley is talking about response. Not prevention.
The funds that were cut did not have anything to do with fire prevention.
Also since California always has a wildfire risk, the LAFD already had well developed prevention and response plans.
So her statement that a mere 7M out of a total 820M budget, is going to adversely affect response is not believable.
It sounds political and she is just throwing Bass under the bus to save her skin.
You also claimed that race, gender and sexual orientation were the cause for wildfires.
Since experts have already weighed in on this and said that fires such as this cannot be contained, and also common sense, we can now ignore this as unrelated MAGA brain fart.
How good was the response in Canada in Lytton or Fort McMurray?How good was their response? Lol
An expert already said, poor response can be contributed to lack of training and preparedness because of budget cuts...are you a fire expert too?How good was the response in Canada in Lytton or Fort McMurray?
How good was it in Australia or Greece?
What country can deal with higher heat, drought and higher winds that create fires with fire tornadoes?
It has been 21 days since it started and the Palisades fire is 95% contained, the Eaton fire 99% contained and the Hughes fire 98% contained.How good was their response? Lol
Clearly you aren't.An expert already said, poor response can be contributed to lack of training and preparedness because of budget cuts...are you a fire expert too?
I'm not claiming to be an expert...I read what an expert stated.:Clearly you aren't.
If you were you would point out to what the 2% cut actually did that allowed the fires to run out of control and what could have been done to stop them.
But you can't, can you?
You mean the "DEI lesbian fire chief"?..I read what an expert stated.:
And what specifically could have been done better if they had spent that 7 million?I'm not claiming to be an expert...I read what an expert stated.:
"7 million budget cut severely affected the Department's capacity to prepare for, train for and respond to large scale emergencies"
Yet somehow you know better than an expert and think it's no big deal... tell that to LA residents with no houses...![]()
![]()
![]()
the statement was already indicated by the EXPERT.And what specifically could have been done better if they had spent that 7 million?
What would have stopped those fires?
You say you read the expert report but can't say what $7 million could have bought that would have stopped those fires.the statement was already indicated by the EXPERT.
7 million was cut that would've been for training and preparedness and response to catastrophic emergencies...what don't you get from what the expert said? YOu just can't admit the mistake can you? I'm waiting for you to challenge the statement of an expert and just say the expert is not qualified...because you know better than an expert...
Says the guy who makes troll comments and then expects to be taken seriously.That is a pretty good effort at avoiding the discussion.
If you don't wanna believe what the expert said. I can not help you at all...You say you read the expert report but can't say what $7 million could have bought that would have stopped those fires.
Your entire argument is based on this imaginary claim that $7 million could have stopped it.
So you think new breathing equipment would have stopped the California forest fires?If you don't wanna believe what the expert said. I can not help you at all...
"the cuts resulted in eliminating 58 positions, adjusting sworn salary accounts and removing one time expenses. Some have pointed to the one-time expenses such as the purchase of NEW BREATHING equipment for firefighters,
Some might see you as a hopeless case....not me...i'm a nice dude.
Why is Jill in front of the desk and not behind it?...I will say one thing for Joe, he's managed to land the highest job in the country with dementia...Maybe he 's a future spokesman for the Alzheimer Society...Can he lawn bowl?
Notice how Newsom isn't asking the White House to protect his constituents from the fires. He's asking the federal government to protect him from his constituents' criticism.