I think both are valid - going for looks or going for services.
We're just really lucky that many girls provide both.
We're just really lucky that many girls provide both.
Looks VS Service
- Thread starter Shook1
- Start date
I keep both in my repertoire. I love women of all shape, style, experience level and age. But I wont tolerate negative attitude. Or a lady that lacks enthusiam.
i.e. your service might be just OK, but if you try to make me happy, i will notice and that makes me happy.
Of course I strive for unicorns: a 10 on look and 12 on service.
i.e. your service might be just OK, but if you try to make me happy, i will notice and that makes me happy.
Of course I strive for unicorns: a 10 on look and 12 on service.
Unfortunately, for me, looks alone just doesn't cut it.
I am in the boat where you need a little of column A and a little of column B.
I am very happy with service = 8 and above and looks a minimum of 7 and above.
Lookers don't necessarily provide a pornstar experience. Maybe a pornstar viewing. But you can get that easily and free through Pornhub.
IMHO, the "lookers" that come to Ottawa are ultra restrictive,. starfishes, or boring AF lays...
Lookers in other cities (MTL or Tdot) very often satisfy my above mix criteria.
I am definitely on board with @ButtMonkey's sentiment.
And looks with bad service (negative attitudes), just kills the experience and to me is a waste of all my little army men.
Anyhoot...my two pennies. But this is a great and old age question...so it just may come down to personal preference.
I am in the boat where you need a little of column A and a little of column B.
I am very happy with service = 8 and above and looks a minimum of 7 and above.
Lookers don't necessarily provide a pornstar experience. Maybe a pornstar viewing. But you can get that easily and free through Pornhub.
IMHO, the "lookers" that come to Ottawa are ultra restrictive,. starfishes, or boring AF lays...
Lookers in other cities (MTL or Tdot) very often satisfy my above mix criteria.
I am definitely on board with @ButtMonkey's sentiment.
And looks with bad service (negative attitudes), just kills the experience and to me is a waste of all my little army men.
Anyhoot...my two pennies. But this is a great and old age question...so it just may come down to personal preference.
Here are two comparables to clarify:
1. Penny Costa - good looking, not gorgeous, with amazing service. Definite repeat.
2. Vicky??? (Tatyana Stax's friend) - DDG but starfish service with many restrictions. The fact that i am not certain about her name indicates how memorable the experience was
Edit- just saw her new ad. The lady's name is Taylor Tease not Vicky.
1. Penny Costa - good looking, not gorgeous, with amazing service. Definite repeat.
2. Vicky??? (Tatyana Stax's friend) - DDG but starfish service with many restrictions. The fact that i am not certain about her name indicates how memorable the experience was
Edit- just saw her new ad. The lady's name is Taylor Tease not Vicky.
Last edited:
For me it's looks over service. Some women in the industry would never be able to get me hard, but don't mistake this for ED...A good-looking woman will always get me hard before she even finishes undressing. That said, a good-looking woman with poor service will never see me again.
Not really into scales tbh as mine would be much different than yours, but you get the point.
I had to go back and read the original post as it seems to me we’ve jumped all over the thread title but not exactly the original question. Unless of course we were meant to interpret the “looks” part of the question as sub par service. Taking the question literally, if we enter into an arrangement knowing no extras are on the menu and just FS, we can hardly complain. However, if we take the broader extrapolation of that question to mean bad attitude, reneging on promised services, no connection, inattentiveness, upselling, clock watching, etc., (which is the way I interpreted the question), then I think the responses make sense. Also, good looking is a very subjective attribute. My 6/10 may be someone else’s 4. But even with different view
points, I did not interpret a 5 or 6/10 as a “dog”. I voted for service but I completely understand that if the provider is so low on the good looking scale, it would be difficult to enjoy the experience or even to be able complete the act. Having said that, in my many years doing this, I’ve never encountered a provider below 6/10 on my personal scale, so selecting service was easy for me.
Ive slept over it.
The perfect answer is 16. But it could be stretch to 15 when Im too horny, market is thin or other bad reasons.
10/10 look with a 6 on service? Yah, I would go for that and repeat. Shes likely charging a premium.
A 6/10 look with 10 on service? Im sure we all know a few. I have several in my GoTo book. Going lower on look and shes likely to have questionnable life and hygiene choices…
An 8/10 with 8 service? Thats a no brainer.
And if she’s 16, and with her parents permission… that will get me banned from the board
The perfect answer is 16. But it could be stretch to 15 when Im too horny, market is thin or other bad reasons.
10/10 look with a 6 on service? Yah, I would go for that and repeat. Shes likely charging a premium.
A 6/10 look with 10 on service? Im sure we all know a few. I have several in my GoTo book. Going lower on look and shes likely to have questionnable life and hygiene choices…
An 8/10 with 8 service? Thats a no brainer.
And if she’s 16, and with her parents permission… that will get me banned from the board
As i reflected to cast my votes for favourite MA and SP of 2023, i realized that Alma is the best example of what this thread is about. Her service was amazing and looked good (not great). After some fantastic sessions, her service quality diminished so i quit repeating. I am not sure why the quality of service diminished. Perhaps i said or did something that bothered her, or perhaps she took for granted that i would keep comkng back? Regardless, i saw her repeatedly because shr knew how to please a man.
The enthusiasm disappeared. First few visits, she was incredibly entusiastic and responsive. The last few, not so much
Service every single time, but, I have a caveat that her body type needs to be what I'm interested in.
Recently had a session with someone who was older. Not an agency lady but had good feedback in her area (not from GTA). She recently moved so I took a chance. Petite milf. Rough around the edges but she was friendly and upbeat and didn't seem to want to shank me and take my money. It was one of the better sessions I had this year and will repeat.
Recently had a session with someone who was older. Not an agency lady but had good feedback in her area (not from GTA). She recently moved so I took a chance. Petite milf. Rough around the edges but she was friendly and upbeat and didn't seem to want to shank me and take my money. It was one of the better sessions I had this year and will repeat.
People here love walking the tightrope. Imho if you even say 40% looks, basically looks gotta matter no matter what so therefore looks should be the vote.
Likewise if you say service, you gotta be able to prefer having a session with a female Doug Ford lookalike with a hairy back but can suck like a Hoover and rim you like she’s searching for buried treasure.
Likewise if you say service, you gotta be able to prefer having a session with a female Doug Ford lookalike with a hairy back but can suck like a Hoover and rim you like she’s searching for buried treasure.
Looks are important - gets me in the door, but service keeps me coming back. It’s sorta like choosing a restaurant - you’re not likely to chose a dingy hole in the wall for a nice dinner. However, if the fancy place‘s food sucks you won’t go back. That’s why I really appreciate this forum ‘cause it’s kinda like TripAdviser for us punters. And just like TripAdviser you have to sift through the reviews and consider the source before choosing.
Even the OP is walking the tightrope. It should say 10/10 hottie vs. 1/10 bottom feeder.
The 2 most attractive girl I saw a few times are both from Montreal, indy Lola the brat and Kate from XO agency.
I think the reason why so many guy seems always disappointed is because of the look. 10 girl are an absolute rarity as escort. Personally I know there is some but never saw one as they ask too much for me.
In 13 years of this I would say there was a lot of ugly girl in the classified add listing like Leolist. But for advertised indy or agency girl they pretty much all range from 5 to 8 with pretty much always nice body.
All girl I see needs to be fit. No necessarily skinny but fit I do not mind curve at all, but fit. Apart from that I definitely go for service.
A fit young girl providing me with great sex becomes a 10
I think the reason why so many guy seems always disappointed is because of the look. 10 girl are an absolute rarity as escort. Personally I know there is some but never saw one as they ask too much for me.
In 13 years of this I would say there was a lot of ugly girl in the classified add listing like Leolist. But for advertised indy or agency girl they pretty much all range from 5 to 8 with pretty much always nice body.
All girl I see needs to be fit. No necessarily skinny but fit I do not mind curve at all, but fit. Apart from that I definitely go for service.
A fit young girl providing me with great sex becomes a 10
Not sure if this is relevant but wouldn't Ruby Lust (aka Theredmilf.com) be a great example of great looks and great service? I only ask because I have never met her, although everything I have read points to sexy as hell and fantabulous service. Just curious.
