Gee, I wonder what our always ass-toot Federal Minister of Health would say. Are certain close-contact sexual activities more covid-risky than others? How does a BBBJ measure up to DFK? Then, behind the scenes, there's DATO to consider... and golden showers. I believe a face to face (even of wearing masks) interview of some 'sexperts' and politicians on CTV would perhaps provide some enlightenment on these matters... as well as provide some badly needed entertainment injected into the always dismal news. Yes, I felt the need to pull you legs over morning coffee.
Last edited:
Wow, that’s an unfortunate trend, no DFK or Greek? They’re missing out lol
C
Cr7819
The world would be a better place if more sp offered dfk
Just wondering how many guys prefer LFK over DFK? I always found the LFK to be much more sensual. Like not even close, way better for me. You could almost orgasm with LFK.
I think it's all in the definition. To some SPs, LFK means touching lips once, then turning away from everything else. I get that some don't want to kiss at all (it is VERY intimate for some) but they don't want to advertise the fact, so they say "LFK". As a result, DFK seems to really mean "I like to kiss".
My thoughts,
N
Okay if the meaning has become diluted over time, then I'll ask more specifically. Who here prefers to kiss while plunging their tongue down somebody else's mouth (DFK), vs. just likes to kiss on the lips (LFK)? The whole tongue thing has never done it for me, and I've asked many of my old clients and most of have said it was never something they liked either, they just meant kissing in general.
Last edited:
Depends on the person, familiarity, etc. YMMV. There are many different kinds of kisses. Why don't you formulate and post a TERB poll?
But the "FK" stands for "French Kissing" which does mean tongue contact. So LFK would mean some tongue contact and possible mouth entry. What you described as LFK is just kissing on the lips so disqualifies it from the "FK" discussion. DFK would be as you describe, though. So many adventures to undergo .....
I can go either way. I prefer to start with more LFK and if the chemistry is there and the mood strikes, I'm open to full on tonsil hockey, but by no means is that something I require. Simple kissing, LFK, is sufficient for me.
If the hygiene is decent, I will 100% go full on tongue war with a girl. I understand why a lot of folks aren't into it, but it definitely works for me.
Good point there, so that means that *FK is another one of those terms that's been diluted out to all hell and doesn't really mean what it originally used to mean anymore. The DFK seems like it's one of those unnecessarily redundant terms, if it involves tongue then it's probably pretty deep. I suppose most people would consider LFK to be that type of kissing that doesn't involve the tongue at all. Maybe they should've called them FK (French kissing) and LK (light kissing)?
Totally agree with you. Booked a lady for half hour session once and as soon as I walked in the door was greeted with DFK. Kept it up for the entire time, in the hall entrance, non stop. I couldn't stop, she wouldn't stop....insane (lol)
I guess I'd differentiate like this (I didn't think it was needed but assumptions are funny sometimes):
#1. Kissing on the lips
#2. Light French Kissing -- some tongue contact ( along the lines of light pussy-eating )
#3. Deep French Kissing -- tonsil hockey as you said
You seem to be missing the entire possibility of #2 being part of the fun. In other words, you can work up to full-on tongue assaults by starting with simple cautionary how-do-you-do tongue explorations.
Many SPs for me have been cool with #2 (me with mouthwash and/or appropriate gum before appointment). Pink Kitty's Rain was an SP who would definitely engage in DFK where we could map out each other's taste buds. For me, she's the only one I can recall who did it to that level. It was fun, anyway!!!
