He has the same issue with Trump , He has 35 pages of posts and counting. He says he's a lawyer, which he might be but he's either retired or doesn;t have any clients because he has a lot of time on his hands to roam x and post here.
LOL..Is Carney For Real? Listen To This.
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
You did notice that the 247k that filed for unemployment were in the last week and likely not in those numbers?You do know that is net new jobs.
You do know that the 247K isn't really out of line with historical trends. You might be better served keeping quiet and having people think you are stupid, rather than speaking up and proving them right.
We are not, we are less indebted then the G7. BUT the debt market between g7 nations is managed cooperatively. The debt tsunami will be far worse then 2008, so we may as well get infrastructure build and enjoy the bubble economy while we can as there will be no escaping the crunch
Actually Germany is better than us, but the rest yes are more indebted. Just shows you how bad it is for the leading economies and countries of the world.
Please explain to me how the g7 nations debt markets are managed cooperatively? I worked in the markets, I certainly have no idea what you think that means, I saw no evidence of such claim.
And no, don't run up your debt just because you think the sovereign debt markets are going to explode, and you might as well have had more than less when this happens. This is just nonesense.
Just to be clear, you are the one lobbing partisan bullshit in this thread, but cannot back up any real criticism. As, as what I said, the whole "wait to see what he accomplishes," I thought you might be sharp enough to read between the lines and understand that it includes things he doesn't. The point is, the odds of a successful non-confidence vote in the very near future are slim and nil.
Here's the question: Didn't Trump promise he would be able to lower promises for food and gas immediately? Tackle inflation in one day. End the war in Ukraine quickly? Reinvigorate the economy fast? Those were his campaign promises. That is why they were mocking him, because unlike his cult, we all knew it would take time and not the bluster and lies of Mango Mussolini...
The level of psychopathy is truly astounding.
So you've been online and no doubt seen my question. I am still waiting for an answer. You doing some research now that you have been called on your statement.
Please see again the video posted below. Unless you think I'm David Eby, you're not making sense.
Regarding votes of non-confidence, he's already losing that battle.
Liberals downplay narrowly lost vote demanding spring budget
'We knew the outcome of what that vote was going to be,' chief government whip Mark Gerretsen told reporters on Tuesday.
nationalpost.com
And these are just a couple of many obstacles. Be ignorant all you want, they exist and will sink the Carney and the Liberals.
Great, that should be easy to prove.You do know that the 247K isn't really out of line with historical trends. You might be better served keeping quiet and having people think you are stupid, rather than speaking up and proving them right.
Please post how many weeks the US added 247k or more to the unemployment numbers.
I'll start the popcorn.
Here is a chart and a report from the labour department. You can do the counting, there were too many for me to do that. I hope you didn't eat much of that popcorn and certainly didn't get any stuck in your throat. You would think that you would check a bit yourself before trying to sound like you were some superior intellect. As I said before, better to be silent and have people think you are stupid, rather than speak, and prove everyone correct. I will wait for the humble apology. btw = move the cursor over the chart, it will show the numbers. I am doing this, as I doubt you would figure that out on your own. Cheers.
Initial Claims
Graph and download economic data for Initial Claims (ICSA) from 1967-01-07 to 2025-05-31 about initial claims, headline figure, and USA.
fred.stlouisfed.org
Didn't Carney say he would stand up to Trump right away? Remember elbows up? What happened there? He folded like a cheap beach chair. Trump's administration also did lower the price of gas and inflation as well as the price of eggs, not within the first week but it happened . He so far has failed on the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, He was also successful in basically closing the border to migrants within a week, which the Dems couldn't or wouldn't do in 4 years.
Here are 5 things Carney pledged to do lets see how many get done. My guess would be zero because what the Liberals are great at is spending money with little return and not keeping promises
Five things Carney says he will do as Canadian prime minister
The election winner wants to double Canada's home-building rate, cut some taxes and boost car-making.
www.bbc.com
Last edited:
And just my opinion, Carney's "One Economy" policy will be his "Legalize Marijuana" moment.
It will happen, but will not have the impact it's hyped up to be.
It will happen, but will not have the impact it's hyped up to be.
He wants us to be sure!You do know that the 247K isn't really out of line with historical trends. You might be better served keeping quiet and having people think you are stupid, rather than speaking up and proving them right.
I am sure frankfooter has seen the data by now, but probably isn't capable of counting that high. Still waiting for hear back... again. These lefties think they are so deep, but when challenged, they fold like a house of cards.He wants us to be sure!
Last edited:
What's entertaining is we were both wrong.
I was wrong in that it wasn't 247k new registered as unemployed and you were wrong saying that its hit 247k new unemployment in one week.
8,000 more unemployed in one week.
Could you repeat that in English this time. I have no idea what you are trying to say, were you out drinking all day. The data is that there were 247K new claims by people just becoming unemployed, and I said it wasn't that high based on historical trends, which it isn't. And secondly I said it doesn't necessarily reflect a net loss of employment, as often there are offsetting new hires. The only real issue is whether the 247K is a really unusual number, which you initially implied. No it isn't. Not sure what you think I was wrong with in my contention, but I do know you overplayed the 247K number. I told you, don't get baited by a leftist that posted something with zero context.
