LOL..Is Carney For Real? Listen To This.

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,864
473
83
Your obsession for Pee has gone beyond a fetish, it's a mental problem. He doesn't even have a seat and you can't stop fantasizing about him.

Meanwhile Carney can't give you any details on what he wants to do and how he will fund it and it's nothing but silence from you.

It's Carney's job to present a plan. If you want Conservatives to do it, vote for them next time.
He has the same issue with Trump , He has 35 pages of posts and counting. He says he's a lawyer, which he might be but he's either retired or doesn;t have any clients because he has a lot of time on his hands to roam x and post here.
 

the general

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2010
512
274
63
You did notice that the 247k that filed for unemployment were in the last week and likely not in those numbers?
You do know that the 247K isn't really out of line with historical trends. You might be better served keeping quiet and having people think you are stupid, rather than speaking up and proving them right. 🤡🤡
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
24,794
2,856
113
Yes, liquidity was provided both by the government and the Bank of Canada, as the markets became illiquid. But you missed the point, basically it is okay to not follow the lead of your peers, just because you are going to get impacted anyways. LCR and bank leverage in Canada was much lower due to regulatory requirements. Also, lending practices were more strict in Canada. So, it is a good thing not to follow your peers, as you will be less impacted in a stress event. Just like being fiscally prudent would be good to lead, rather than follow, something you seem to think is crazy.
We are not, we are less indebted then the G7. BUT the debt market between g7 nations is managed cooperatively. The debt tsunami will be far worse then 2008, so we may as well get infrastructure build and enjoy the bubble economy while we can as there will be no escaping the crunch
 

the general

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2010
512
274
63
We are not, we are less indebted then the G7. BUT the debt market between g7 nations is managed cooperatively. The debt tsunami will be far worse then 2008, so we may as well get infrastructure build and enjoy the bubble economy while we can as there will be no escaping the crunch
Actually Germany is better than us, but the rest yes are more indebted. Just shows you how bad it is for the leading economies and countries of the world.

Please explain to me how the g7 nations debt markets are managed cooperatively? I worked in the markets, I certainly have no idea what you think that means, I saw no evidence of such claim.

And no, don't run up your debt just because you think the sovereign debt markets are going to explode, and you might as well have had more than less when this happens. This is just nonesense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,344
5,481
113
Do you think the NDP/Bloc or Greens want to trigger a new vote that quickly?
uhhh, Yeah. They have lost many seats and would do anything to get some back if that opportunity comes. Jagmeet Singh isn't here to save you guys anymore.

most Canadians aren't that partisan and are willing to see what he accomplishes.
I beg to differ. Look at the total vote share, the seats and the close riding races. Plus this is now a parliament discussion and you don't have the majority.
Right now Carney is a clean slate, but give it time. Let's see what he looks like when that new shine wears off and he looks a little dirty.


Overall, you're whole post is why I call you ignorant. You're not actually looking at what's really happening. Carney can "unveil" all the BS he wants, it doesn't matter. This is a lot farther away than he's leading on.

Just to be clear, you are the one lobbing partisan bullshit in this thread, but cannot back up any real criticism. As, as what I said, the whole "wait to see what he accomplishes," I thought you might be sharp enough to read between the lines and understand that it includes things he doesn't. The point is, the odds of a successful non-confidence vote in the very near future are slim and nil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,344
5,481
113
You mean similar to Trump when won and within a week the Dems were asking why the price of eggs hasn't dropped?
Here's the question: Didn't Trump promise he would be able to lower promises for food and gas immediately? Tackle inflation in one day. End the war in Ukraine quickly? Reinvigorate the economy fast? Those were his campaign promises. That is why they were mocking him, because unlike his cult, we all knew it would take time and not the bluster and lies of Mango Mussolini...
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
28,340
56,994
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Your obsession for Pee has gone beyond a fetish, it's a mental problem. He doesn't even have a seat and you can't stop fantasizing about him.

Meanwhile Carney can't give you any details on what he wants to do and how he will fund it and it's nothing but silence from you.

It's Carney's job to present a plan. If you want Conservatives to do it, vote for them next time.
The level of psychopathy is truly astounding.
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
3,823
4,241
113
Just to be clear, you are the one lobbing partisan bullshit in this thread, but cannot back up any real criticism. As, as what I said, the whole "wait to see what he accomplishes," I thought you might be sharp enough to read between the lines and understand that it includes things he doesn't. The point is, the odds of a successful non-confidence vote in the very near future are slim and nil.
Please see again the video posted below. Unless you think I'm David Eby, you're not making sense.

Regarding votes of non-confidence, he's already losing that battle.

And these are just a couple of many obstacles. Be ignorant all you want, they exist and will sink the Carney and the Liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: optimusprime69

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
97,772
25,884
113
You do know that the 247K isn't really out of line with historical trends. You might be better served keeping quiet and having people think you are stupid, rather than speaking up and proving them right. 🤡🤡
Great, that should be easy to prove.
Please post how many weeks the US added 247k or more to the unemployment numbers.

I'll start the popcorn.

 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,828
2,881
113
It's fun watching Liberal supporters support a government who is slowly walking back all of their "elbows up" slogans which had sucked them into voting for them.

Don't you feel silly?
that's just Carney doin' the moon walk. He's not only brilliant but he's fun!
 

the general

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2010
512
274
63
Great, that should be easy to prove.
Please post how many weeks the US added 247k or more to the unemployment numbers.

I'll start the popcorn.

Here is a chart and a report from the labour department. You can do the counting, there were too many for me to do that. I hope you didn't eat much of that popcorn and certainly didn't get any stuck in your throat. You would think that you would check a bit yourself before trying to sound like you were some superior intellect. As I said before, better to be silent and have people think you are stupid, rather than speak, and prove everyone correct. I will wait for the humble apology. btw = move the cursor over the chart, it will show the numbers. I am doing this, as I doubt you would figure that out on your own. Cheers.


 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,864
473
83
Here's the question: Didn't Trump promise he would be able to lower promises for food and gas immediately? Tackle inflation in one day. End the war in Ukraine quickly? Reinvigorate the economy fast? Those were his campaign promises. That is why they were mocking him, because unlike his cult, we all knew it would take time and not the bluster and lies of Mango Mussolini...
Didn't Carney say he would stand up to Trump right away? Remember elbows up? What happened there? He folded like a cheap beach chair. Trump's administration also did lower the price of gas and inflation as well as the price of eggs, not within the first week but it happened . He so far has failed on the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, He was also successful in basically closing the border to migrants within a week, which the Dems couldn't or wouldn't do in 4 years.

Here are 5 things Carney pledged to do lets see how many get done. My guess would be zero because what the Liberals are great at is spending money with little return and not keeping promises

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: optimusprime69

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
3,823
4,241
113
And just my opinion, Carney's "One Economy" policy will be his "Legalize Marijuana" moment.

It will happen, but will not have the impact it's hyped up to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: optimusprime69

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
97,772
25,884
113
I am sure frankfooter has seen the data by now, but probably isn't capable of counting that high. Still waiting for hear back... again. These lefties think they are so deep, but when challenged, they fold like a house of cards.
What's entertaining is we were both wrong.
I was wrong in that it wasn't 247k new registered as unemployed and you were wrong saying that its hit 247k new unemployment in one week.
8,000 more unemployed in one week.

 

the general

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2010
512
274
63
What's entertaining is we were both wrong.
I was wrong in that it wasn't 247k new registered as unemployed and you were wrong saying that its hit 247k new unemployment in one week.
8,000 more unemployed in one week.

Could you repeat that in English this time. I have no idea what you are trying to say, were you out drinking all day. The data is that there were 247K new claims by people just becoming unemployed, and I said it wasn't that high based on historical trends, which it isn't. And secondly I said it doesn't necessarily reflect a net loss of employment, as often there are offsetting new hires. The only real issue is whether the 247K is a really unusual number, which you initially implied. No it isn't. Not sure what you think I was wrong with in my contention, but I do know you overplayed the 247K number. I told you, don't get baited by a leftist that posted something with zero context.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts