LOL....you know back in those days SP's were hard to come by thoughLancsLad said:I voted Conservative because there was no category defined as " Ultra hard Right Reactionary throwback to Victorian Times", if there was I would have selected that
That is because there was no TERB, then.Esco! said:LOL....you know back in those days SP's were hard to come by though
You still wanna be a " Ultra hard Right Reactionary throwback to Victorian Times"???
Esco! said:LOL....you know back in those days SP's were hard to come by though
You still wanna be a " Ultra hard Right Reactionary throwback to Victorian Times"???
Ah, yes. The good old days of raping and pillaging. Conquest just ain't what it used to be.LancsLad said:Didn't need SP's, plenty of females in all the lands we were busy conquering.
Asterix said:Ah, yes. The good old days of raping and pillaging. Conquest just ain't what it used to be.
the "animal" you are looking for is called a Red Tory. IE, Progressive Conservative.hinz said:Me myself is a fiscal conversative and social liberal. So far I do not see this kind of political animal in Canada, let alone the United States.
Thats not true, the PC party isnt socially liberalCompromised said:the "animal" you are looking for is called a Red Tory. IE, Progressive Conservative.
Hmm, aren't they endangered species ?Compromised said:the "animal" you are looking for is called a Red Tory. IE, Progressive Conservative.
So what is the difference between PC party and the Conservative?Esco! said:Thats not true, the PC party isnt socially liberal
LancsLad said:Didn't need SP's, plenty of females in all the lands we were busy conquering.
Asterix said:Ah, yes. The good old days of raping and pillaging. Conquest just ain't what it used to be.
LancsLad said:Truer words have never been spoken.
I meant this present Harper party.Carcharias said:Sure it was. (Note the past tense.) That was the appeal of the early Mulroney-years PC party; socially progressive, fiscally conservative.
danmand said:You continue to forget that the english were the ones being conquered, raped and pillaged. If it hadn't been for that limey womanizer Nelson ....
If its for the Carlsberg then.........................YES!!!!!!!!!LancsLad said:Do we have to raze Copenhagen again?
Hostile takeover is more appropriateCarcharias said:The "Progressive" was dropped from the name when the PCs were ambushed by the Reform/Alliance/whatever they called themselves.
Can you say oximoron when you consider that you are a fiscal comsertive and a social liberal???hinz said:What difference does it make? All politicans are "cut from the same cloth", regardless of their affiliation.
It doesn't matter whether he or she is a NDP, Bloc, Tory, Grits or even Green. It's all about money and he or she cares only in hustling, purveying for votes and favours.
And yes, these politicans are generously compensated, maybe not so as the CEOs to take and get all the sh*ts and spits from their constituents. They will do whatever they can, as long as it's legal to keep the power.
Me myself is a fiscal conversative and social liberal. So far I do not see oyuthis kind of political animal in Canada, let alone the United States.