Let's see how subjective beauty is...

[Hipjdog]

I've heard a lot on this board on how beauty is so subjective, so I thought I would test it:

How attractive would you rate this actress? It's Natalia Dyer from Stranger Things.
Please don't be persuaded by other people's responses. Just be honest.



To me, she is a 7.

 

[unassuming]

Gotta see her with a bald face, I'm guessing with no make up, she's a 5.5 - 6.

 

[jsanchez]

Neither ugly nor attractive.
I like to use this thread as an example, someone's 10 would be my 6-7 so the numbers don't mean much either.

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/gorgeous-girls-that-are-facially-stunning.751192/

 

[onomatopoeia]

Anybody remember the site hotornot(dot)com, where people uploaded selfies of themselves to be rated on the 1-10 scale?

 

[escortsxxx]

I've heard a lot on this board on how beauty is so subjective, so I thought I would test it:

How attractive would you rate this actress? It's Natalia Dyer from Stranger Things.
Please don't be persuaded by other people's responses. Just be honest.

View attachment 199357

To me, she is a 7.

7

 

[escortsxxx]

Anybody remember the site hotornot(dot)com, where people uploaded selfies of themselves to be rated on the 1-10 scale?

a search gets

Hot or Not? Rate Pictures of Single Women & Men!

www.letshangout.com

 

[poker]

I guess we need to define what each number on the scale means.

For me…
1 - 3 is the ugly zone. Think “throw Momma from the train”.

4 - 6 is the run of the mill avg looking girl. No shame in this zone. After all, by definition, most people are avg.

7 - 9 is good looking to fucking hot.

10. Unicorn beauty. The kind of girl in magazines that has been air brushed and photoshopped. She does not exist, (and if she did, you could not afford her.) (yes, even you!)

 

[unassuming]

A true beauty does not need any make up.

 

[poker]

A true beauty does not need any make up.

Can you not just rate the picture?

 

[Hipjdog]

We all know how a 1-10 scale works.

I'm surprised at the amount of guys labelling her a 3 thus far. Really, she's 2 digits away from the
ugliest woman in the world? I don't buy it.

 

[poker]

We all know how a 1-10 scale works.

I'm surprised at the amount of guys labelling her a 3 thus far. Really, she's 2 digits away from the
ugliest woman in the world? I don't buy it.

Yes, some guys think by projecting bullshit “high standards”, it somehow translates to them being of higher value. I actually enjoy it…. Watching the avg pretend they are special.

 

[Hipjdog]

Yes, some guys think by projecting bullshit “high standards”, it somehow translates to them being of higher value. I actually enjoy it…. Watching the avg pretend they are special.

On an anonymous poll. Agreed, it's ridiculous.

 

[curr3n_c1000]

6 is fair

She has slightly above average beauty, but not stunning beauty.

 

[xix]

Face wise 5.9 I need to see the whole package or body. And I have checked and I drop it to 4.5.

 

[jsanchez]

Yes, some guys think by projecting bullshit “high standards”, it somehow translates to them being of higher value. I actually enjoy it…. Watching the avg pretend they are special.

Do you expect others to have the same standards? I mostly agree with your scale above, except for the 9/10's,
my 9+ may be your 5 and vice versa.

For the record, 4.

 

[jsanchez]

I've heard a lot on this board on how beauty is so subjective, so I thought I would test it:

It won't be long before you get your answer
(it's very subjective, curious to see if anyone votes for 8-9 ).

 

[Twister]

Pretty eyes, but don't like her jaws and ears.

 

[angrymime666]

I would need to see her without make up but from the picture posted shes a 4. I find her facial structure rather masculine. square jaw line. straight hair signals sickly to me. I find women with natural curls and waves much more appealing.

I dont think she would provide the genetics Im looking for in a woman to pass onto children if I wanted them.

OP great post. Ive always been fascinated by how other men select.

first and foremost for men, there are women we want to fuck and women we would have a relationship with.

 

[Hipjdog]

I would need to see her without make up but from the picture posted shes a 4. I find her facial structure rather masculine. square jaw line. straight hair signals sickly to me. I find women with natural curls and waves much more appealing.

I dont think she would provide the genetics Im looking for in a woman to pass onto children if I wanted them.

OP great post. Ive always been fascinated by how other men select.

first and foremost for men, there are women we want to fuck and women we would have a relationship with.

Most of the ratings are in the 5 to 7 range, which I expected.

The 3 rating is baffling to me. A 3 for me is someone who is significantly overweight or something.

I should mention there are much better photos of her. I picked a more average one.

 

[SuddenAwakening]

I think if there were more photos it'd be easier. Kind of hard to judge with one photo. I'd say a 5 based off this photo.