Sexual abuse, sexual assault and rape are not all the same.
Learn the differences and then we can continue the conversation.
Leticia James is a loser!!
- Thread starter mitchell76
- Start date
Learn the differences and then we can continue the conversation.
If Hamas was tried in civil court the jury would side with the plaintiff.
A reminder about how civil law works:
For civil trials, the burden of proof is lower; generally based on the “preponderance of evidence” or “clear and convincing” standards. In other words, the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury that their version of events is more reliable than that of the defendant. It is not obligatory to convince the judge “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
He didn't get convicted of rape.
Say that over and over to yourself...then ask yourself why you think you should contradict the law and make up your own version of it.
I'll leave you and Kautilya to argue amongst yourselves so you can both get on the same page as to who's version of the law makes each one of you happier. The rest of us will actually follow the real law.
Carry on...
You need a plaintiff first.
When someone in Canada and NY is committed of sexual assault we call them 'rapists'. Not 'sexual assaulters' or some made up word.
They are called rapists.
Trump is a rapist.
You support him not despite this rape, but for his raping, judging by you never once saying he did anything wrong or that sexual assault is wrong.
The plaintiffs are dead. Did you conveniently miss that part?
Amazing the lengths you go to when excusing terrorists, rapists, kidnappers and murderers that support your narrative while condemning others just because they trigger you.
Who are these plaintiffs?
Why are there no victims or names of victims?
With rump we have multiple victims, first hand testimony and a direct admission that he liked to grab them by the pussy?
Is that what this is about?
You think rump in power means you can grab them by the pussy too?
I never said he was convicted of rape.
He was found criminally liable of sexual assault.
Because in New York State, the legal crime of rape (until September 1) requires penetration by a penis.
Now, some might say that this means he isn't guilty (in the colloquial, not the legal, sense) of rape.
But in reality, only an idiot or someone being deeply dishonest would ever do that, because no one thinks that "found guilty in a criminal court of this specific term" is the actual thing that defines truth.
This is why when Trump tried to sue for defamation that people can't say he raped Carroll because that's not what the verdict said, the judge pointed out that outside of the specific forum of the law, what the jury found absolutely counts as them reaching a finding that he raped her.
Look. maybe you are an idiot, and really believe no one in Canada has raped anyone since the early 80s.
But I kind of think that isn't true and you are well aware of the difference.
NEW: Brooklyn State Sen Kevin Parker, known for his fiery temper and political controversies, finds himself embroiled in a legal paradox. He’s battling r*pe allegations under the very law he voted for—the "Adult Survivors Act." Parker, who once promoted this legislation as a victory for justice, is now calling it unconstitutional in a desperate bid to fend off a lawsuit accusing him of a 2004 rape. “I voted in favor of the [Adult Survivors Act] to ensure all New Yorkers can seek justice and be heard,” Parker said of the legislation, signed into law by Hochul in May 2022. “These allegations are absolutely untrue. My work and advocacy will continue,” Parker now states, defending his past actions. Yet, his recent legal maneuvers starkly contrast his prior stance, highlighting a dramatic flip as he now questions the law’s constitutionality after it allowed Olga Jean-Baptiste to bring forth her lawsuit against him. Jean-Baptiste alleges Parker assaulted her during a 2004 collaboration on relief efforts for Haiti. Governor Hochul described the accusations as “deeply disturbing,” adding to the senator's troubles, which include past convictions for assault and criminal mischief.
NY Dem Who Voted For Law Meant to Ensare President Trump Now Says Law is Unconstitutional After Rape Suit Against Him Life comes at you fast! Now, Kevin Parker, a Democrat state senator representing Brooklyn, is calling the Adult Survivors Act unconstitutional, and yet he voted for it.
Considering Hamas is holding at least 30 dead, and over 130 living hostages, I think you can figure out who the plaintiffs are. You're not that stupid are you?
Or are you just playing stupid because you tripped over your hypocrisy again?
I find it funny that you quote the law when it suits your purpose, and then make exceptions for the law when it doesn't.
How about you pick a side to argue from so you don't keep looking foolish?
Up to this point, your credibility is zero so you can only go up from there.
It's funny...
People like you start with "Trump is a POS" because you don't like the way he looks or speaks, etc.
Then you find reasons to justify your hatred after that.
It's so obvious it laughable.
"Confirmation bias". Read up on that and you will be enlightened.
Yeah sure.
You can lie to us here, but you know you can't lie to yourself.
Todays story is that you think Hamas raped people on Oct 7 and then took them back as hostages?
Despite all the hostages who have been released saying they were treated well?
You are rather skoobid.
No, skoob, people say rump is a POS cuz he's committed rape, fraud and an attempt coup, because he's racist, corrupt, lies his face off and is a born rich, entitled elitist who makes fun of his supporters.
Sooo… The D-bag New York State Senator that pushed the "Adult Survivors Act"… You know, the change in the law that let E. Jean Carroll to go after Trump with a BS story from 30 years ago… Ya, now he says the law is unconstitutional because a rape lawsuit got filed against him!! You can’t make this shit up!!
