I paint the girls, not the room silly!JPsoHot said:Hey Slurp........You got any time to paint a few rooms for me?? LOL
Great story!!
Did you guys call out for some egg rolls after wards??
I bet they were oriental........know you and your preferences.
They would have no problem surviving a constitutional challenge -- in fact, the Supreme Court has already ruled on the constitutionality of a number of elements of the offences. And yes, it is illegal to be found in a place where illegal gambling is going on ("common gaming house" or "common betting house").massman said:I'd bet the bawdy house laws would have trouble surviving a constitutional challenge. Is it illegal to be "found in" a crack house? a place where illegal gamling is going on? the same apartment where your roomate in the next room is downloading child porn? I doubt it (I'm no lawyer). Teh bawdy house laws are the only ones I know where you are guilty by association. What goes on behind closed doors between consenting adults is no business of the law. If there are neighbour complaints about traffic, people going in and out, there are other provisions, mostly municipal by laws, that deal with running a business out of your home.
Well I think you re partlially right.thompo69 said:They would have no problem surviving a constitutional challenge -- in fact, the Supreme Court has already ruled on the constitutionality of a number of elements of the offences. And yes, it is illegal to be found in a place where illegal gambling is going on ("common gaming house" or "common betting house").
Whether it's against the law, and whether or not it's enforced, are two different things.JPsoHot said:Well I think you re partlially right.
Knowing a few cops and firemen myself, they have to be some of the fondest dudes of this type of activity. Some of them are human too right??
Soooo what you can say is that if they are invited into or are part of an illegal loop its not as much of an offence when they are part of it. Remember they always protect their own asses & the asses of the their illegal friends.
The same way they take care of a few tickets here and there they can do the same in other illegal activity. AND BELEIVE ME THEY FRIGGEN DO!! Day in and Day out!!
You re soo right.....I agree 110 %!thompo69 said:Whether it's against the law, and whether or not it's enforced, are two different things.
As I said, I aint no lawyer, but how in a free society, can you be arrested for simply being in a place where some type of illegal activity is going on (especially when in actual fact the activity itself - prostitution- is not illegal)? These are obviously antiquated laws, and must violate our basic freedoms of association.thompo69 said:They would have no problem surviving a constitutional challenge -- in fact, the Supreme Court has already ruled on the constitutionality of a number of elements of the offences. And yes, it is illegal to be found in a place where illegal gambling is going on ("common gaming house" or "common betting house").
As was discussed in another thread, the act of paying for sex in and of itself is not illegal -- it's how it's done that determines whether or not it is legal. But keeping a bawdy house IS illegal, and the courts have ruled on the constitutionality of it. Now, being found in a bawdy house is again, not in and of itself illegal -- the offence is being found in a bawdy house without lawful excuse.massman said:As I said, I aint no lawyer, but how in a free society, can you be arrested for simply being in a place where some type of illegal activity is going on (especially when in actual fact the activity itself - prostitution- is not illegal)? These are obviously antiquated laws, and must violate our basic freedoms of association.
We reject other forms of "guilt by association", so why does our justice system accept this?
Is this why there is very rarely any mention of escorts being busted for their activities?thompo69 said:As was discussed in another thread, the act of paying for sex in and of itself is not illegal -- it's how it's done that determines whether or not it is legal. But keeping a bawdy house IS illegal, and the courts have ruled on the constitutionality of it. Now, being found in a bawdy house is again, not in and of itself illegal -- the offence is being found in a bawdy house without lawful excuse.
As I understood that Quebec court ruling about the resent clamp down on swinger clubs in Montreal;Jasmin_MA said:It could be classified as an act of indecency - but the test for that was set out in the Supreme Court decision on swingers clubs and its a harms test - did the person know what was going to happen - were there adequate signage or warnings of what to expect - ie: someone thought they were going to get a legitimate massage and ended up being solicited for extra services and was offended by nudity etc.
Great analogy!pikatail said:... Kinda like McDonald's offering free smiles with your meal. You dint pay for it, didn't ask for it, but it was nice to get and you'll probably go back since they made you feel special.
Like I said in another thread, I hope this isn`t just a fluke. Let`s hope for a few more decisions like that!rpm-guy said:Did you guys see this thread in the lounge?
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=166764
Seems like at least one Ontario court judge interprets precident the same way Jasmin does. When pricing is all-inclusive, MPs offering release do not contravene the bawdy house laws.
There is a link to the actual judgement text here, which is interesting reading.
Unless it's challenged in appeals court, it becomes legal precedent. The judge has defined that a HJ in itself is not prostitution if no dealing took place, and that it wasn't an indecent act that would have made the place a common bawdy house.riceking said:Like I said in another thread, I hope this isn't just a fluke. Let's hope for a few more decisions like that!
All we need now is a judge to rule BJ to be part of the massage and we're all set!!!!wilbur said:Unless it's challenged in appeals court, it becomes legal precedent. The judge has defined that a HJ in itself is not prostitution if no dealing took place, and that it wasn't an indecent act that would have made the place a common bawdy house.
Lets hope that, in the future, the justice system spends its time prosecuting real crime, instead of stimulation between consenting adults.
slurp said:I prefer to have my penis massaged by a vagina
Now THAT's a full body massage *g*
Hopefully an oriental fortune cookie lil vagina HUH????? LOL
Double O-ree-gottoooo Mr Robotto!!!!!