leasing vs. purchaing

titleist3

New member
Mar 15, 2006
5
0
1
The math on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce is as follows:

After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million. Assuming he got sex every night during their 5 year relationship (which would NOT have happened!) it ended up costing him $26,849 per time.


On the other hand, Elliot Spitzer's call girl, Kristen, an absolute stunner with a body like no other, charges $4,000 an hour. For anything!

Had Paul McCartney 'employed' Kristen for 5 years, he would've paid $7.3 million for an hour of sex every night for 5 years (a saving of $41.7 million).

Value-added benefits are: a 22 year old hot babe, no begging, no coaxing, never a headache, plays all requests, ability to put BOTH legs around you (!!!), no bitching and complaining or 'to do' lists. Best of all, she leaves when you're done, and comes back when you ask her. All at 1/7th the cost, with no legal fees.

Sometimes renting makes far more sense.
 
titleist3 said:
Sometimes renting makes far more sense.

How about the cost of being humiliated as a complete douchebag in front of the whole world, losing your position and the respect of your colleagues and family. :(
 
He may have paid her $49 million, but at least it did not cost him an arm and a leg!:D
 
If it floats flys or fuc*s then I'd say rent.

OTB
 
At that level, I'd rent. The value of the asset(woman) would depreciate like a American used car. Plus you would never know if the woman really liked you past your fame and fortune (McCartney, Spitzer)