The One Spa

Kash Patel and Dan Bongino on Epstein

Bucktee

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2024
1,900
2,265
113
These two clowns were championing transparency and releasing the Epstein list and getting to the bottom of Epstein's untimely death.

Now that they're in office, they're acting the same way as their predecessors.

The truth must be so terrifying, and run so deep, and involve so many powerful people that it's too dangerous for them and their families to release the information quickly and unedited.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
98,048
26,079
113
Indeed they have.
And they will never go away, whether or not there is an investigation.
Both trump and Elon fanned those flames.
Trump declaring he'd release the papers and then Elon saying he had the Epstein dirt.

It will continue as long as the US is in subservience to Israel.
Putin will be jealous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Insidious Von

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,619
69,465
113
Both trump and Elon fanned those flames.
Trump declaring he'd release the papers and then Elon saying he had the Epstein dirt.

It will continue as long as the US is in subservience to Israel.
Putin will be jealous.
"He is secretly Mossad" is an evergreen accusation that has been in the US for various people for decades.
The only way it will ever go away is if proof a particular person actually is comes out.
If no proof comes out, that will just continue the rumours.

As for Trump and Musk fanning these flames -- yes. Epstein became a cause celebre in the Right Wing Fever Swamp and so is used by that group for clout or accusations.
Which is why Bongino and Patel said a lot about it before and why Musk used it against Trump.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
98,048
26,079
113
"He is secretly Mossad" is an evergreen accusation that has been in the US for various people for decades.
The only way it will ever go away is if proof a particular person actually is comes out.
If no proof comes out, that will just continue the rumours.

As for Trump and Musk fanning these flames -- yes. Epstein became a cause celebre in the Right Wing Fever Swamp and so is used by that group for clout or accusations.
Which is why Bongino and Patel said a lot about it before and why Musk used it against Trump.
Did you miss this?


Epstein wins the 'secretly Mossad' badge by a landslide.
Again, whether its true or not it should be investigated, though who appears impartial enough to do it?

 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,619
69,465
113
No.
Like I said, Musk used Epstein to attack Trump because the whole Epstein thing is a really big deal on the right.

Epstein wins the 'secretly Mossad' badge by a landslide.
I don't even know what you think you mean by that.

Again, whether its true or not it should be investigated, though who appears impartial enough to do it?
This is my point.
Like most people who care deeply about this, you will never believe the answer is "no", only that the answer is "yes".
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Oracle

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
98,048
26,079
113
No.
Like I said, Musk used Epstein to attack Trump because the whole Epstein thing is a really big deal on the right.
Musk is supposed to have access now to all files through DOGE.
It should be a big deal.

I don't even know what you think you mean by that.
There are accusations that most american politicians have been bought by AIPAC but not 'secretly Mossad' in the same way.
This is another level.


This is my point.
Like most people who care deeply about this, you will never believe the answer is "no", only that the answer is "yes".
Not my point, I'm just wondering who in the states could ever appear impartial enough to do a report that either side would trust.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,619
69,465
113
Musk is supposed to have access now to all files through DOGE.
It should be a big deal.
Musk also lies constantly and slanders people whenever he is mad.
There is no particular reason to believe he has anything new here.

There are accusations that most american politicians have been bought by AIPAC but not 'secretly Mossad' in the same way.
This is another level.
Epstein wasn't an American politician.
Just about every prominent Jewish person has been accused of being "secretly Mossad" since I was a kid.
I'm sure some of them even were.

Not my point, I'm just wondering who in the states could ever appear impartial enough to do a report that either side would trust.
No one will be trusted by everyone ever again.
The question is whether it would be trusted by a wide enough group of people.
For that, positive proof will outweigh negative proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
98,048
26,079
113
Musk also lies constantly and slanders people whenever he is mad.
There is no particular reason to believe he has anything new here.
There is no reason to say he can't have anything new either.

Epstein wasn't an American politician.
Just about every prominent Jewish person has been accused of being "secretly Mossad" since I was a kid.
I'm sure some of them even were.
Sure, same way everyone critical of Israeli policy is accused of being 'antisemitic'.
Same weaponization.

No one will be trusted by everyone ever again.
The question is whether it would be trusted by a wide enough group of people.
For that, positive proof will outweigh negative proof.
People will be talking about AIPAC and Epstein long after the end of zionism, I'm sure.
Regardless of what is investigated.

Given the last two years, those questions will not go away.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,619
69,465
113
There is no reason to say he can't have anything new either.
I didn't.
He obviously could.
But there isn't much reason to think he does, since he provided nothing other than a mean tweet and he is a known liar who tweets bullshit.

Sure, same way everyone critical of Israeli policy is accused of being 'antisemitic'.
Same weaponization.
Well, opposite weaponization, actually.
Calling anyone who is a prominent Jew an agent of Mossad is antisemitism.
Calling anyone who criticizes Israeli policy antisemetic is the opposite.

People will be talking about AIPAC and Epstein long after the end of zionism, I'm sure.
Regardless of what is investigated.

Given the last two years, those questions will not go away.
Of course.
Antisemitism has a long history.
They will talk about both far beyond the reality of what happened.
 
Toronto Escorts