@karenstintz: I received a @torontopolice ticket today for an alleged rolling stop,on a side street while on my bike. Fighting it. http://t.co/0t4JdZvEE4
Hello, Karen you didn't get a ticket for a "rolling stop", you got nailed for Disobey Stop Sign - Fail to Stop. Maybe she should read the HTA section 128 (1) (a).@karenstintz: I received a @torontopolice ticket today for an alleged rolling stop,on a side street while on my bike. Fighting it. http://t.co/0t4JdZvEE4
@karenstintz: I received a @torontopolice ticket today for an alleged rolling stop,on a side street while on my bike. Fighting it. http://t.co/0t4JdZvEE4
Or we could just exempt cyclists from that rule as other jurisdictions have.Hello, Karen you didn't get a ticket for a "rolling stop", you got nailed for Disobey Stop Sign - Fail to Stop. Maybe she should read the HTA section 128 (1) (a).
I wish cops would nail more cyclists for running stop signs, red lights, riding on sidewalks and the wrong way on one-way streets. You got what you deserve!
Or we could just exempt cyclists from that rule as other jurisdictions have.
The solution is to word it that a cyclist must check all directions and only enter the intersection if they have a right of way.
A cyclist does not need to stop to do that safely, as several other jurisdictions have realised.
She's the one calling it an "alleged" rolling stop, which means she doesn't believe her own words.
Bull farking shit. The Highway Traffic Act states that a bicycle is a vehicle and the operator MUST obey the laws for his/her own safety. I used to ride a bike quite often, and saw a lot of cyclist assholes who really needed to be taken off the road, as asshole drivers who need to be taken off the road. Any jurisdiction that does not enforce the HTA is fucked up. Show some responsibility and maturity if you want the privilege of using the road. A bike is NOT a toy.Or we could just exempt cyclists from that rule as other jurisdictions have.
The solution is to word it that a cyclist must check all directions and only enter the intersection if they have a right of way.
A cyclist does not need to stop to do that safely, as several other jurisdictions have realised.
Up, but I never could understand cyclist like this. Let's see, my vehicle weighs 4000 lbs and in her case. she and her bike might be 200 lbs She'd lose at first contact, simple physics.With that rule, I can see some cyclists feeling that they have the right of way and not stopping after a car has stopped and proceeded forward. Problems will ensue.
(You can slow down a car so much that you can scope out an intersection safely too but we have to stop because yielding rules will be abused).
Cyclists will start to think they are pedestrians and walk where every they want, whenever and however.With that rule, I can see some cyclists feeling that they have the right of way and not stopping after a car has stopped and proceeded forward. Problems will ensue.
(You can slow down a car so much that you can scope out an intersection safely too but we have to stop because yielding rules will be abused).
Stintz shows why no one feels they need to obey the laws anymore. She has received the ticket, and now she is going to fight it. Waste more taxpayer money.@karenstintz: I received a @torontopolice ticket today for an alleged rolling stop,on a side street while on my bike. Fighting it. http://t.co/0t4JdZvEE4
Some cyclists do that anyway but they would be in violation of either law. In states where they implemented the "Idaho stop" for cyclists problems have not ensued.With that rule, I can see some cyclists feeling that they have the right of way and not stopping after a car has stopped and proceeded forward. Problems will ensue.
And cars use additional fuel and wear out brake linings. It's just as easy and just as safe for a car to 'roll' as stop sign as a bike. If we're going to change laws, lets do it right.Some cyclists do that anyway but they would be in violation of either law. In states where they implemented the "Idaho stop" for cyclists problems have not ensued.
The rule is simply inappropriate for cyclists who incur a large momentum penalty for no gain in safety by following this rule. There is an easy way to rewrite the rule so it continues to be enforceable against people who run stop signs, but without the obvious car bias.
Perhaps a scheduled day off? Is Stintz' schedule posted publicly?Id like to know why she is out riding...and not in the office at 9:42 am!
Taxpayers pay her to bike?
Yes because additional fuel and wear on your break linings is just exactly the same thing as losing your momentum on a bicycle.And cars use additional fuel and wear out brake linings. It's just as easy and just as safe for a car to 'roll' as stop sign as a bike. If we're going to change laws, lets do it right.
Have they instituted the "Idaho stop" in any city as large and with a population density anywhere close to Toronto? The problem I see is when you allow a cyclist to make make a judgement call whether it's safe to do a rolling stop at red lights and stop signs, is that they'll be expecting cars to wait until they blow through which will cause all sorts of problems.Some cyclists do that anyway but they would be in violation of either law. In states where they implemented the "Idaho stop" for cyclists problems have not ensued.
That's what I thought, what is she 17 years old? Strange for a City Councillor to post a pic of her ticket for failing to stop on Twitter. What's the message here? I slowed down but didn't completely stop so I shouldn't have received a ticket? I ride a bicycle unlike Ford who reads while driving everywhere? The Cop was lying? I was wrongfully accused? Yadda, yadda yadda... Can you imagine the headlines if Ford posted a pic of a traffic ticket? Maybe she's just training to be the next Mayor!Wow..what a sucky poo. Posting a pic and whining.......
It isn't hard to stop for a stop sign or red light on a bicycle. I know, I cycle all the time. Maybe if you're in your 80's or 90's and still cycling, it would be harder to constantly stop/start but that's not the demographic who's A. cycling and B. running red lights and stop signs.The rule is simply inappropriate for cyclists who incur a large momentum penalty for no gain in safety by following this rule. There is an easy way to rewrite the rule so it continues to be enforceable against people who run stop signs, but without the obvious car bias.
Yeah, fuji should have no problem with that. What's wrong with a car going through a red light or stop sign if the coast is clear?And cars use additional fuel and wear out brake linings. It's just as easy and just as safe for a car to 'roll' as stop sign as a bike. If we're going to change laws, lets do it right.
You sound like you don't know how to manage momentum, or you're really out of shape.Yes because additional fuel and wear on your break linings is just exactly the same thing as losing your momentum on a bicycle.
I take it you have never actually been on a bicycle?