looks terrible which is very surprising considering Spielberg is involved again.
I can't wait for it! Story? Phht...who needs it? It's dinosaurs baby!
looks terrible which is very surprising considering Spielberg is involved again.
It doesn't look too bad, but definitely not as good as the first one, nothing will ever touch the first one.
I think a lot of it has to do with CGI which is probably most of this movie. This one doesn't feel as personal (if that makes sense), meaning, it looks to be like a lot of people are thrown into a scene, create some dinosaurs and you got action.
Whereas the first was very intimate with the scenes and the intense encounters with the characters. There are a lot of "snap zoom" scenes it seems or maybe it's just the trailer.
Seems like there are a lot of what they call "snap zoom" scenes (going from wide to zoom in on a particular scene/person, etc), which is just typical of today's movies.
I don't recall too well of the original Jurassic Park if they did this much or not, but I don't think so. It's a good tool but I don't think for this kind of movie it would work that well, maybe it's just the trailer.
The characters in the original you really engaged with and liked them, except for the fat guy (don't know his name).
This one seems like just a bunch of guys doing their thing and whatever.....but again, could be the trailer.
The premise is kinda cool though, having Raptors as trained hunters.
Nothing will ever touch the original, that movie still holds amazing to this day, Spielberg, Winston, the cast, the crew of course, knocked it way out of the park.
Great characters, good acting, it was very intimate, I really got lost in that world when I saw it. The idea of movies is to be taken to a whole different world or lose yourself in it, that's a good sign of something well done, the original did that.
ya I just think the story line in general is weak. Like opening scene in the trailer where is standing in front of 3 dinosaurs....give me a break.
I can't wait for it! Story? Phht...who needs it? It's dinosaurs baby!
ya I hear what your saying but I still like a decent story line.
BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.
These guys seem to think it's possible - http://www.livescience.com/50275-bringing-back-woolly-mammoth-dna.html It's only 3600 years old but...
Of course it's pure BS. But it's dinosaurs! hehehe! I'm excited...gotta find a way to bring the family!
I'm 90% sure this is going to turn into "Planet of The Dinosaurs" Part 1.
Doesn't seem too bad, but didn't those flying dinos escape Jurassic island in the earlier movies?
BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.
Doesn't seem too bad, but didn't those flying dinos escape Jurassic island in the earlier movies?
BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.
looks terrible which is very surprising considering Spielberg is involved again.
Personally, I'm excited. A good action flick doesn't need a fantastic plot. Maybe I'm just easily entertained lol