Jurassic Park - Trailer

one.of.a.kind

Banned
Dec 31, 2013
2,791
0
0
Unique, Canada
 
looks terrible which is very surprising considering Spielberg is involved again.

It doesn't look too bad, but definitely not as good as the first one, nothing will ever touch the first one.

I think a lot of it has to do with CGI which is probably most of this movie. This one doesn't feel as personal (if that makes sense), meaning, it looks to be like a lot of people are thrown into a scene, create some dinosaurs and you got action.
Whereas the first was very intimate with the scenes and the intense encounters with the characters. There are a lot of "snap zoom" scenes it seems or maybe it's just the trailer.
Seems like there are a lot of what they call "snap zoom" scenes (going from wide to zoom in on a particular scene/person, etc), which is just typical of today's movies.
I don't recall too well of the original Jurassic Park if they did this much or not, but I don't think so. It's a good tool but I don't think for this kind of movie it would work that well, maybe it's just the trailer.
The characters in the original you really engaged with and liked them, except for the fat guy (don't know his name).
This one seems like just a bunch of guys doing their thing and whatever.....but again, could be the trailer.
The premise is kinda cool though, having Raptors as trained hunters.

Nothing will ever touch the original, that movie still holds amazing to this day, Spielberg, Winston, the cast, the crew of course, knocked it way out of the park.
Great characters, good acting, it was very intimate, I really got lost in that world when I saw it. The idea of movies is to be taken to a whole different world or lose yourself in it, that's a good sign of something well done, the original did that.
 
ya I just think the story line in general is weak. Like opening scene in the trailer where is standing in front of 3 dinosaurs....give me a break.
 
looks terrible which is very surprising considering Spielberg is involved again.

It does look kind of dumb.
Now we have the dinosaur whisperer ?





It doesn't look too bad, but definitely not as good as the first one, nothing will ever touch the first one.

I think a lot of it has to do with CGI which is probably most of this movie. This one doesn't feel as personal (if that makes sense), meaning, it looks to be like a lot of people are thrown into a scene, create some dinosaurs and you got action.
Whereas the first was very intimate with the scenes and the intense encounters with the characters. There are a lot of "snap zoom" scenes it seems or maybe it's just the trailer.
Seems like there are a lot of what they call "snap zoom" scenes (going from wide to zoom in on a particular scene/person, etc), which is just typical of today's movies.
I don't recall too well of the original Jurassic Park if they did this much or not, but I don't think so. It's a good tool but I don't think for this kind of movie it would work that well, maybe it's just the trailer.
The characters in the original you really engaged with and liked them, except for the fat guy (don't know his name).
This one seems like just a bunch of guys doing their thing and whatever.....but again, could be the trailer.
The premise is kinda cool though, having Raptors as trained hunters.

Nothing will ever touch the original, that movie still holds amazing to this day, Spielberg, Winston, the cast, the crew of course, knocked it way out of the park.
Great characters, good acting, it was very intimate, I really got lost in that world when I saw it. The idea of movies is to be taken to a whole different world or lose yourself in it, that's a good sign of something well done, the original did that.

'Dennis Nerdy' played by Wayne Knight of Seinfeld fame as Newman.





ya I just think the story line in general is weak. Like opening scene in the trailer where is standing in front of 3 dinosaurs....give me a break.

"... give me a break" ... Exactly what I thought.





I can't wait for it! Story? Phht...who needs it? It's dinosaurs baby!

There is always that. I like dinosaur movies.





ya I hear what your saying but I still like a decent story line.

Then there is this.
Hopefully this movie is at least entertain in the dinosaur action parts.
 
Doesn't seem too bad, but didn't those flying dinos escape Jurassic island in the earlier movies?

BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.
 
Of course it's pure BS. But it's dinosaurs! hehehe! I'm excited...gotta find a way to bring the family!

Me too! Maybe I'll take my nephews. (It would still be cool if they can revive ancient species but the implications can be scary).
 
After watching the trailers, I was afraid this was going to be a letdown. Typical fare. But I'm hearing good things about it now. Apparently it's got good character development and acting; it's not all about the CGI action. Might have to give it a shot.
 
Doesn't seem too bad, but didn't those flying dinos escape Jurassic island in the earlier movies?

BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.

Actually the DNA half life is ~ 520 years. Nothing is impossible and science is already finding DNA sources where it was considered unlikely just a few years back. "scientists have discovered 419 million-year-old DNA intact inside ancient salt deposits." (bacteria) Link: http://news.discovery.com/earth/weather-extreme-events/oldest-dna-bacteria-discovered.htm
"Oldest-ever human forerunner DNA found in 400,000-year-old ‘Pit of Bones’ fossil poses new evolutionary mystery" Link: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/o...f-bones-fossil-poses-new-evolutionary-mystery

So never say never !
 
Doesn't seem too bad, but didn't those flying dinos escape Jurassic island in the earlier movies?

BTW, that dino DNA cloning thing is pure bullshit. DNA has a relatively short half life and it would disintegrate in just 520-ish years. No way it could survive 65 million years or longer.

Your the guy who has no problem with superman flying n shit but gets all pissed when no one can recognise that he's Clark Kent, aren't you.
 
It's a good movie, I would say almost on par with original, better in someways but worse in others, overall very entertaining.
 
Personally, I'm excited. A good action flick doesn't need a fantastic plot. Maybe I'm just easily entertained lol

It's all good, I'm the same way, I see some nice cleavage and I'm thoroughly entertained.
Slow-Clap.gif
 
I'm not sold on this.

Since real dinosaurs are stranger that made up ones, I'm not enthusiastic about Indominus Rex. However Ridley Scott's favorite dinosaur the Mosasaur (progenitor to the Alien) is in this film. I'll probably see for Mosa, that is one extremely badass dino! It had a double jaw.