Judge Merchan is totally bias!!

[Frankfooter]

Troubling to the extent that someone wasn't thoroughly vetting third-party content before posting it yes.
Reassuring that they took it down immediately because they don't believe in that narrative.

You keep telling yourself that skoob.
The rest of us see it as the party of the white replacement theory letting the veil slip yet again.

 

[Skoob]

You keep telling yourself that skoob.
The rest of us see it as the party of the white replacement theory letting the veil slip yet again.

That's just good ol' predictable leftist propaganda you're peddling. The usual vitriol spewed by hypocritical Marxists towards people that dare have different opinions and beliefs.

 

[mitchell76]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794413123237195940

 

[mitchell76]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794182291201142862

EXCLUSIVE:

NEW YORK’S DEMOCRAT GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL
@GovKathyHochul
HAS SENT NEARLY $700,000 IN PAYMENTS TO THE PERSONAL HOME RESIDENCE OF LOREN MERCHAN, THE DAUGHTER OF NEW YORK JUDGE JUAN MERCHAN!

As President Trump’s trial enters it’s 6th week in New York City, I have discovered that New York Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul (another Trump hater)
@KathyHochul
is a client of New York Judge Merchan’s daughter, Loren Merchan, who is the President of the Democrat Consulting Firm Authentic Campaigns
@Authentic_HQ
. Yesterday, when President Trump held a rally in the Bronx, NY, Governor Hochul went on
@CNN
with Fake Tapper
@jaketapper
and called Trump supporters who showed up to the #Bronx rally “clowns”. According to records in the New York State Board of Elections database, Hochul has sent $689,974.35 to Loren Merchan’s personal home address in Richmond Virginia. This comes after I also exposed how New York Democrat Congressman
@RepDanGoldman
has sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to Loren’s house, and as I exposed yesterday, New York Democrat Congressman
@hakeemjeffries
, aka Dollar Tree Barrack Hussein Obama, the Democrat House Minority Leader, has sent nearly $1.5 Million to Loren Merchan’s personal home address where she lives with her husband Taylor Harper, who is an employee at
@JoeBiden
’s
@uscensusbureau
. Isn’t it interesting how so many of the most high profile elected Democrats in New York are clients of Judge Merchan’s daughter, and have sent her millions of dollars in total to her personal residence as opposed to sending the checks to the Authentic Campaigns Headquarter office in Chicago? The Biden-Harris campaign and
@SenSchumer
are also paid clients of Judge Merchan’s daughter. This is really starting to look like a money laundering operation, isn’t it? Why won’t
@HouseGOP

@GOPoversight
investigate and subpoena Loren Merchan? This is so blatant.

 

[Frankfooter]

That's just good ol' predictable leftist propaganda you're peddling. The usual vitriol spewed by hypocritical Marxists towards people that dare have different opinions and beliefs.

You mean different beliefs like the third reich, white replacement crap you push?

 

[squeezer]

 

[mitchell76]

 

[mitchell76]

 

[squeezer]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

TRUMP SMELLS BAD

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[silentkisser]

Fair enough...but there's also a chance a Democrat posted it if we're leaving everything up to chance here right?

Fact of the matter is that misleading information is exactly that. Saying "Trump talked about the Reich..." is misleading. He didn't. But those who choose to not verify information will just assume what they hear others say is accurate.

Um...no, unless you are alleging that someone hacked his account and NOBODY talked about that. That would be shocking.

 

[Skoob]

Um...no, unless you are alleging that someone hacked his account and NOBODY talked about that. That would be shocking.

Wasn't it you who started saying "by chance"? If by chance, then anything could happen by chance right? That was my point.

Fact is, you know as well as everyone else, he didn't post anything himself and certainly didn't talk about the Reich as you alleged.

So why the need to spread misleading information if you are so confident in your bias?

 

[mitchell76]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795137274667024817

 

[silentkisser]

Wasn't it you who started saying "by chance"? If by chance, then anything could happen by chance right? That was my point.

Fact is, you know as well as everyone else, he didn't post anything himself and certainly didn't talk about the Reich as you alleged.

So why the need to spread misleading information if you are so confident in your bias?

Let me put it this way. Sure. There is a chance that a democrat operative hacked Trump's phone and posted that. Sure, I could win Lotto Max tomorrow. So, yes, there is a chance. BUT -- Do you seriously think if that were the case, Trump or the Secret Service wouldn't be freaking out about it?

And.....it should also be pointed out that Trump has used Nazi rhetoric in the past, and according to his former chief of staff General John Kelly, said that Hitler did some good things....So, posting about the unified Reich isn't so far off his brand that it isn't conceivable that he could have either posted it or authorized it.

 

[Skoob]

Let me put it this way. Sure. There is a chance that a democrat operative hacked Trump's phone and posted that. Sure, I could win Lotto Max tomorrow. So, yes, there is a chance. BUT -- Do you seriously think if that were the case, Trump or the Secret Service wouldn't be freaking out about it?

And.....it should also be pointed out that Trump has used Nazi rhetoric in the past, and according to his former chief of staff General John Kelly, said that Hitler did some good things....So, posting about the unified Reich isn't so far off his brand that it isn't conceivable that he could have either posted it or authorized it.

Saying "he talked about the Reich" is a misleading statement.

Hearsay means nothing if it can't be proven.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fact-check-posts-claim-trump-140100766.html

 

[squeezer]

MAGA TRIGGERED, Biden FINALLY Takes the Gloves Off!

 

[Frankfooter]

Saying "he talked about the Reich" is a misleading statement.

Now you're defending nazis.
Way to go, skoob.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792750065179828235

 

[Valcazar]

Here's something to chew on.

I remembered Congress has a multimillion dollar slush fund to pay off various suits against members Democrats and Republicans. I believe many of these payments are to make sexual harassment charges go away. This is kind of a gentlemen's understanding amongst Congressional members that these payments will be made from the Congressional budget and details will be kept private.

When you realize House members are up for election every two years, it's not hard to make the connection of these "privacy" payments benefiting the campaigns of accused members. In reality, I would say even Senate members' campaigns benefit from this discreet payments. Shall I call them "hush money"?

You might.
But paying hush money isn't illegal.

It also would be explicitly not a campaign finance issue since the fund existed legally for exactly that purpose, wouldn't it.

But it is an interesting question and maybe was a line of defense that could have been pursued.

 

[Valcazar]

Sorry I’m not sure how that would work. Wouldn’t it require the defence to provide the prosecution with its list of questions and vice versa? Seems terribly impractical. Do you have any link to this purported rule?

Here's a decent summary.

Getting a Fair Trial in New York

theblanchlawfirm.com

 

[Valcazar]

If is was the campaign's intention to purposefully post the reference then why would they have taken it down so quickly? You seriously think no one would have anticipated backlash?
Come on. Get serious here.

I would argue they expected people not to notice.
Or, they just don't notice Nazi references anymore.

This wasn't a campaign post, it was a Trump post on his Truth Social.

 

[mitchell76]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795844798043095515

BREAKING.

Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.