Judge Merchan is totally bias!!
- Thread starter mitchell76
- Start date
Grasping at straws....lol. First, it is pointed out in the tweet that someone offered unsolicited advice. That doesn't mean Engoron took it. I mean, just because someone says something to him out of court doesn't mean it would influence the decision. What a waste of time. But typical of the right's attack on the judicial branch of the government went it goes against them for their malfeasance....
JUST IN: One of Alvin Bragg’s paralegals, Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, admitted on the stand that the prosecutors deleted call records between Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson. The prosecution submitted the records into evidence, but didn’t mention that they deleted some records. This alone should be grounds for a mistrial! Why isn’t the GOP doing anything to stop this? Where is Speaker Johnson?
JUST IN: Trump’s legal team is asking the Judge to question jurors on whether or not they seen Stormy Daniels post on X, in which she said “real men respond to testimony by being sworn in and taking the stand in court. Oh…wait. Never mind.” If the jurors seen this post, this would destroy the entire case. The fact that this woman is allowed to go on social media and attack Trump, but he isn’t allowed to defend himself, is a gross injustice. This Judge needs to be fully investigated and removed. Why do we allow these rogue judges to rule with a partisan bias?
Jonathan Turley: “We don't know what the crime is. Judge should have brought clarity on what the fraud was. Trump did not commit a Campaign Finance violation. Department of Justice chose not to charge it - Only reason we’re here is because Bragg has a bizarre theory… I have never in my career seen a trial like this one!”
JUST IN: Judge Juan Merchan appears to be working for Alvin Bragg, or at least that’s what could be assumed by his behavior. The prosecution wants to submit former Trump organization head Allen Weisselberg’s severance agreement. The defense objected to this, because the agreement was done after the alleged crime and has nothing to do with the case. The judge is suggesting the prosecution subpoena Weisselberg even though they decided against it. How is this allowed? This judge is a joke
