John Travolta Scadel

spankingman

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2008
3,639
321
83
JOHN TRAVOLTA SCANDEL!!!!!!

Just heard that some low life parasites in the Bahama's are holding "alleged photos" of Johns son Jett while he was in distress when the Ambulances came RANSOM for milllions of dollars. One is said to be a Bahamian Politician.

These people if known to Police should have their sorry ass's thrown on JAIL until this photo is recovered and returned to the Travolta family for detruction. Its amazing what people will do for money in this world.

Im not sure who is worse the BUYER or the SELLER!!!!!!!!!!
 
Bunch of low lifes!:mad:
 
notanerd said:
Scum of the lowest order.

Who? the people demanding the money, the magazines that would pay for them or the people that would buy the magazine because they want to see the photos?
 
tboy said:
Who? the people demanding the money, the magazines that would pay for them or the people that would buy the magazine because they want to see the photos?
All three.
 
-
Major embarrassment for the Bahamas, an island that prides itself as the destination for high-end celebrities, and the guy who tried to extort Travolta is the island's former tourism minister of all things.
 
spankingman said:
JOHN TRAVOLTA SCANDEL!!!!!!

Im not sure who is worse the BUYER or the SELLER!!!!!!!!!!

I don't think there'd be ANY media here in North America who'd be so insensitive to offer money or even dare publish such photos... Sure most ppl love to know what's happening in the private lives of celebrities, but this is a whole different area we're talking about. Most of us would be disgusted if such photos were even published. I mean those said pictures are of Travolta crying and cradling his dead son ...

How stupid could could those three involved be??? and did I hear right that they're politicians??? just goes to show how stupid some politicians actually are
 
LKD said:
I don't think there'd be ANY media here in North America who'd be so insensitive to offer money or even dare publish such photos... I mean those said pictures are of Travolta crying and cradling his dead son ...
I think you would be surprised. There are a few tabloids who strive for that crap.:mad:
 
a 1 player said:
I think you would be surprised. There are a few tabloids who strive for that crap.:mad:

give me ONE example where the involved media published images of person crying over a dead body of a loved one.
 
a 1 player said:
Look at any newspaper in the world that covers war.

u probably missed what i wrote... I meant any media in North America or atleast the western world, those who know the difference between what's right and wrong
 
LKD said:
u probably missed what i wrote... I meant any media in North America or atleast the western world, those who know the difference between what's right and wrong
I agree with you, and know what you meant. My opinion is just that integrity is flexible when it comes to selling issues. There have been many examples of bad journalism in the past that I would consider 'similar', just in an attempt to increase sales. Many of these magazines I would not consider reputable, actually on the contrary. Every time I see picture of 'Amy Winehouse's addiction, the Olsen twins anorexia, pictures of a celebrity leaving a courthouse, upskirt photographs, the paparazzi fiasco around Lady Di... It would not be a far step to exploit the Travolta tragedy in the same manner. Peoples pain sells. Damn shame but true.
 
John Travolta

Didin't the Paparazzi in their "quest for a headline story etc"cause the death of Lady Di? a few years back? The Paps are a bunch of blood sucking maggots
and would do ANYTHING for that MILLION DOLLAR SHOT!!!!!!!!!

I hope JT sues their asses off. :mad:
 
Last edited:
It is the media that makes these people "celebrities" and wealthy in the first place. Look at this as some payback.
 
stang said:
It is the media that makes these people "celebrities" and wealthy in the first place. Look at this as some payback.

that is the argument of the paparazzi but it isn't the pap who make them famous, it is their PR people, their "act" or talent, and promotion. Paparazzi just prey on that and the people who buy the mags that keep the paps employed have to seriously get a life.

I think the paparazzi are a necessary evil but there should be limits. Like all have to be registered, limit the number in any given city, limit the distance to the subject being shot, NO flash photography at moving vehicles etc.

I would also make it illegal to post pictures of a celeb's kids without their written permission.
 
stang said:
It is the media that makes these people "celebrities" and wealthy in the first place. Look at this as some payback.


I don't about that.
There is a certain amount of respect each and every person deserves.
Its called human decency.

A family who has lost a loved one should be an even greater amount of respect in order to deal with their tragedy in private.

They certainly do not owe "payback" to a bunch of para-cites, regardless of their fame or how they became famous.