^ this, unfortunately these days you'll have to make a decision by reading Western-based and Eastern-based like RT and settle on something in between.
That said, not necessarily a bad thing, one should always form their own opinioms and not just take any single outlet as the only purveyor of truth. Of course, quality can also change with time so just sticking to a single good source now does not mean they will always retain objectiity and unbiased reporting. Al Jazeera is a great example of falling in line with the Western narrative of the Arab Spring but super critial of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan prior to 2011.
The best solution is to watch foreign media that doesn't have any skin in the other country's news.
Of course, I wouldn't take seriously China Central TV's news about China itself, but it becomes interesting watching their analysis into news of other countries. You get a better sense of US politics, for example, without them falling into the identity politics trap. They actually talk about policies, and not personalities, like most of the US media, and parroted by the Canadian media.
Al Jazeera is owned by and dictated to the Ruler of Qatar. Their news reflects to policies of the State of Qatar, and I stopped watching them over a decade ago.
AP is a CIA mouthpiece.
Reuters is the mouthpiece of the British establishment and their public school chums.
I watch a couple of RT shows like Crosstalk for a different point of view on international issues; you at least get the Russian perspective on things. 'Going Underground' will give you a non-comformist view of UK politics. It's not that the Western media lie.... it's what they often conveniently don't report if it upsets the narrative.