JD Vance gets chased out Vermont by protesters during ski vacation.

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,718
2,163
113
Ukraine got old ammo from certain NATO nations and nothing close to what they actually needed to decisively beat back Russia.
Even with that Russia got decimated.
Whatever the negotiated peace, and whatever Ukraine agrees to there has to be security guarantees in order for Ukraine to agree to it.
Otherwise there will be no peace.
But let us not misstate your objectives here.
You are a Russia supporter and you support anyone who supports Russia, including the compromised American administration.
You made the argument that Ukraine was not even a legitimate state.
I am sure you would have loved it if Russia had completed its invasion of Ukraine but you are now having to settle for the phony concern about Ukrainian lives because this is the best "out" you will get.
Dude, thats because NATO didn't have it. NATO has a very different military doctrine. In the entire Iraq war the USA used 60K artillery shells. There were some days where Russia was using 40K a day!!! NATO and the US MIC does not like artillery because its too cheap. No money to be made selling ammo. Ukraine cannot adopt NATO doctrine fully because its based on airpower. It takes DECADES and kajillions to build it. It is also why Russia has the most advanced air defense systems on the planet, to defend against NATO. So since NATO cannot supply Ukraine to fight an artillery war, and Ukraine is unable to operate a tier 1 air force, its GAME OVER. They are now like the Germans after the Luftwaffe was wiped out. Out in the open, no where to hide with the Russians able to rain artillery, bombs, missiles and drones on them at will and observe any movement from drones and satellites. Ukraine can have some successes with drones, but Russia can double or triple that, and more anti drone systems are being deployed constantly by Russia. Like I said, tell me how ANY GOOD can come from continuing. 🤷‍♂️
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,718
2,163
113
The only shit happening is what’s in your Brian and what comes out of your mouth.
“You people” really are exhausting to debate with. One track mind.
Just insults when confronted by facts. 🙄 I guess you enjoy wearing your depends. On one hand "RUSSIA GONNA ATTACK EUROPE" then next post "RUSSIA ABOUT TO COLLAPSE!!!" W T FFFFFFFFF 🧐
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,173
3,756
113
Who said Putin wants to Turn Europe back 50 years. Does Russia today look like the Soviet Union in 1975? Thats absurd.
Oh look.

It's "I needs to get paid for the shit I post on TERB for you, Vlady" time
 
  • Like
Reactions: Y_Diner

Y_Diner

Well-known member
Mar 5, 2019
2,047
1,937
113
Just insults when confronted by facts. 🙄 I guess you enjoy wearing your depends. On one hand "RUSSIA GONNA ATTACK EUROPE" then next post "RUSSIA ABOUT TO COLLAPSE!!!" W T FFFFFFFFF 🧐
Sure. Also, you’re missing your hero Trump/this centuries Hitler giving his speech to more brainwashed types like you.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
4,468
4,307
113
Dude, thats because NATO didn't have it. NATO has a very different military doctrine. In the entire Iraq war the USA used 60K artillery shells. There were some days where Russia was using 40K a day!!!
You make up a lot of stuff.
The artillery facts you posted is straight up non-fact and I dont know where you pulled that from.
The Wagner guy that died in the aircarsh himself went on social media and said that the Russian Forces did not have enough artillery.
Then they started acquiring duds from N.Korea.
The Russians were also selling off their weapons in the black market to make cash on the side.
So yeah, 40K is quite the dream.
Russia was exposed as being weak in this war, and more military aid to Ukraine, with state of the art planes and missiles would have finished Russia.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,718
2,163
113
You make up a lot of stuff.
The artillery facts you posted is straight up non-fact and I dont know where you pulled that from.
The Wagner guy that died in the aircarsh himself went on social media and said that the Russian Forces did not have enough artillery.
Then they started acquiring duds from N.Korea.
The Russians were also selling off their weapons in the black market to make cash on the side.
So yeah, 40K is quite the dream.
Russia was exposed as being weak in this war, and more military aid to Ukraine, with state of the art planes and missiles would have finished Russia.
Don't take my word for it. Take it from NATO Sec general:

No, I wanted to say Russia is producing in three months in ammunition, what the whole of the Alliance is producing in the year, and this is simply not sustainable. We have to ramp up the defence industry production.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_232943.htm?selectedLocale=en

😀👌

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/10/...shell-production-us-europe-ukraine/index.html


3m shells a year that is 8200 a day, which can easily result in 40K a day during a major battle. Russia has about 5000 heavy artillery pieces, so at most 2000 to 3K are in the Ukraine war, so you can see quite easily how at even 2 rounds/min you can reach 40K in a surge. At the start of the war they had 16m shells stockpiled from Soviet days. Russia has a mutual defense treaty with NK, so it makes perfect sense that NK will test its ammo in Ukraine.

Still no answer from you for your "happy outcome" 🙄🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,659
23,950
113
Dude, thats because NATO didn't have it. NATO has a very different military doctrine. In the entire Iraq war the USA used 60K artillery shells. There were some days where Russia was using 40K a day!!! NATO and the US MIC does not like artillery because its too cheap. No money to be made selling ammo. Ukraine cannot adopt NATO doctrine fully because its based on airpower. It takes DECADES and kajillions to build it. It is also why Russia has the most advanced air defense systems on the planet, to defend against NATO. So since NATO cannot supply Ukraine to fight an artillery war, and Ukraine is unable to operate a tier 1 air force, its GAME OVER. They are now like the Germans after the Luftwaffe was wiped out. Out in the open, no where to hide with the Russians able to rain artillery, bombs, missiles and drones on them at will and observe any movement from drones and satellites. Ukraine can have some successes with drones, but Russia can double or triple that, and more anti drone systems are being deployed constantly by Russia. Like I said, tell me how ANY GOOD can come from continuing. 🤷‍♂️
Yes, that's why Russia was able to take over Ukraine in 3 weeks.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,718
2,163
113
Yes, that's why Russia was able to take over Ukraine in 3 weeks.
That came from Kirby or Milly not Putin. The force Russia deployed at the start was not large enough to take over Ukraine, It was to trigger a negotiation, which it did. And Boris the clown forced Zelensky to fight on. Anyone can look at the numbers and know standard military doctrine would dictate a vastly larger force.
 
Last edited:
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts