Agencies are a necessary evil...part 2
For some of you professional life-long indys, I’m sure you’re convinced there’s no place for agencies in this business. But not every lady wants to look up in their mid thirties and still see themselves answering phones with heavy breathing scum on the other end. SOME of the ladies who chose to enter this business have other aspirations, and wish to concentrate on those versus dedicating time to building an escort business. As such, the service that a good agency can provide, by allowing them to separate that aspect of their life from their private life is invaluable. The problem is not the existence of agencys; the problem is the manner in which agencies operate and deliver their services. One can argue the split is unfair, but the escort makes the decision to work at that agency and terms are terms. As to the benefits aspect, expecting any agency to provide the benefits normally offered to full time exempt or non-exempt employees of a business is patently absurd. The escort has a contractor relationship with the agency. As such that agency is not responsible for providing her with anything other than the advertising, booking and driving services required to facilitate a call. The proper legal relationship between escort and agency is that the agency should be retained by the escort to represent and facilitate her availability. To that end the agency should operate to pass along bookings and allow the escort to discuss business with the client directly. This would be entirely legal under existing law, separating the agent from harm from the sexual aspects, and would be a real service to both client and escort. Such arrangements do not currently exist for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is a lack of integrity on the part of both the women in the business and the people who represent themselves as agents.
Lastly, to the issue of agencies controlling bookings based on favoritism to ladies who provide more liberal services, and hence influencing women to offer services they otherwise would not; yes this does exist. Yes fraternization between agency owners and the escorts can and does happen, regrettably even occurring in at least one of the esteemed agencies being mentioned on this board. But this type of favoritism is no different a case than would confront the average independent. Yes that independent would get more call volume, but her rate of closure would be about the same. The difference would be that she’d get more closes…given the call volume. The tradeoff…she’d have to dedicate a hell of a lot more time to those closures. This is what the agency is paid for. The agency is paid to provide a live voice to a client who calls a number for access. They are paid to book that lady and deliver her to a time and place of the clients choosing. “Busy” women don’t discount this as an important service. Lazy women expect it as a right of passage, but then they’ve got no better alternatives in mind for their life. Indy’s rail against this because they see a disproportionate number of women emerge for working in these agencies with nothing to show for it. The fact is the majority of women who work for these agencies are not sufficiently responsible to run their own business and need someone to manage their affairs. It’s either that agencies fill this gap, or the reputation of the business further suffers as clients encounter yet more incompetence and irresponsibility in ranks of the independents. I would think indys would be grateful for this. Because as more indys hit the market, you will see the same kind of pressure to alter your “services” as you claim is forced upon ladies who work in agencies. The pressure the agency ladies see is lack of repeats..not unlike you own, except that as an indy, you have no shield to even trick a client into that first initial call, i.e. not if the client understands his rights. As a client, I can think of nothing better than to be able to call an agency and have them provide me with a lady based on their knowledge of my preferences in the areas of service. Why would any agency think it’s a good idea to send a woman out to a clients site given they knew the client would not be happy with the menu? It’s patent nonsense to believe that agencies shouldn’t do this. It’s not in anybody’s best interest to send an escort to a client when they know he won’t be happy and she could the recipient of his anger. There isn’t a single agency in operation that has women who provide uniform services. Most of the scam operations don’t give a shit about whether their women even provide full service, let alone bbbj. All they need is the money. And incidently ladies..lay off the bbbj nonsense. As I already told one lady, just because you don’t provide the services, doesn’t mean that others don’t have the right to provide them. You will get clients who are happy with your limited menu. Those of us who favor bbbj will be looking elsewhere.
EBS
For some of you professional life-long indys, I’m sure you’re convinced there’s no place for agencies in this business. But not every lady wants to look up in their mid thirties and still see themselves answering phones with heavy breathing scum on the other end. SOME of the ladies who chose to enter this business have other aspirations, and wish to concentrate on those versus dedicating time to building an escort business. As such, the service that a good agency can provide, by allowing them to separate that aspect of their life from their private life is invaluable. The problem is not the existence of agencys; the problem is the manner in which agencies operate and deliver their services. One can argue the split is unfair, but the escort makes the decision to work at that agency and terms are terms. As to the benefits aspect, expecting any agency to provide the benefits normally offered to full time exempt or non-exempt employees of a business is patently absurd. The escort has a contractor relationship with the agency. As such that agency is not responsible for providing her with anything other than the advertising, booking and driving services required to facilitate a call. The proper legal relationship between escort and agency is that the agency should be retained by the escort to represent and facilitate her availability. To that end the agency should operate to pass along bookings and allow the escort to discuss business with the client directly. This would be entirely legal under existing law, separating the agent from harm from the sexual aspects, and would be a real service to both client and escort. Such arrangements do not currently exist for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is a lack of integrity on the part of both the women in the business and the people who represent themselves as agents.
Lastly, to the issue of agencies controlling bookings based on favoritism to ladies who provide more liberal services, and hence influencing women to offer services they otherwise would not; yes this does exist. Yes fraternization between agency owners and the escorts can and does happen, regrettably even occurring in at least one of the esteemed agencies being mentioned on this board. But this type of favoritism is no different a case than would confront the average independent. Yes that independent would get more call volume, but her rate of closure would be about the same. The difference would be that she’d get more closes…given the call volume. The tradeoff…she’d have to dedicate a hell of a lot more time to those closures. This is what the agency is paid for. The agency is paid to provide a live voice to a client who calls a number for access. They are paid to book that lady and deliver her to a time and place of the clients choosing. “Busy” women don’t discount this as an important service. Lazy women expect it as a right of passage, but then they’ve got no better alternatives in mind for their life. Indy’s rail against this because they see a disproportionate number of women emerge for working in these agencies with nothing to show for it. The fact is the majority of women who work for these agencies are not sufficiently responsible to run their own business and need someone to manage their affairs. It’s either that agencies fill this gap, or the reputation of the business further suffers as clients encounter yet more incompetence and irresponsibility in ranks of the independents. I would think indys would be grateful for this. Because as more indys hit the market, you will see the same kind of pressure to alter your “services” as you claim is forced upon ladies who work in agencies. The pressure the agency ladies see is lack of repeats..not unlike you own, except that as an indy, you have no shield to even trick a client into that first initial call, i.e. not if the client understands his rights. As a client, I can think of nothing better than to be able to call an agency and have them provide me with a lady based on their knowledge of my preferences in the areas of service. Why would any agency think it’s a good idea to send a woman out to a clients site given they knew the client would not be happy with the menu? It’s patent nonsense to believe that agencies shouldn’t do this. It’s not in anybody’s best interest to send an escort to a client when they know he won’t be happy and she could the recipient of his anger. There isn’t a single agency in operation that has women who provide uniform services. Most of the scam operations don’t give a shit about whether their women even provide full service, let alone bbbj. All they need is the money. And incidently ladies..lay off the bbbj nonsense. As I already told one lady, just because you don’t provide the services, doesn’t mean that others don’t have the right to provide them. You will get clients who are happy with your limited menu. Those of us who favor bbbj will be looking elsewhere.
EBS
